Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

After another enjoyable day at WTAC, and hearing the gibson motorsport cars, can anyone explain to me why the HR31 sounds absolutly mental?

Is it all in the exhaust? (or lack of)

Looking in the bay obviously it has the GTS-R exhaust mani, but still has an internally gated turbo.

The note is different to pretty much any RB i've ever heard.

Could it be its maybe revving harder?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/
Share on other sites

Yeah someone on the R31 Skyline club had a replica made. Can't remember who. Pretty much just get someone to make the longest equal length runners that will fit in the engine bay.

Yes the car is a GTS-R but the manifolds were made by Gibson (slightly different to GTS-R, sound is pretty much the same I believe). If you were to throw a GTS-R manifold on your RB, it would sound pretty much the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/#findComment-7073840
Share on other sites

Why does it have a circular opening in the flange to the turbo ? Seems odd?

Also, the fact that the GTS-R and Gibson manifolds are tube not pipe, means the resonance from them will be different. If you want MAX banshee than tubular manifold will be the pick. not one out of pipe bends

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/#findComment-7074013
Share on other sites

Didn't the GRP A regs state that the exhaust manifold had to remain standard from the head to the first join? Hence the VL Walky had individual exhaust runners about 3-4"long from the head, after which the exhaust was free.

If that's the case, how would Gibson have homologated this manifold? Or did turbo engines have a different set of rules?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/#findComment-7074058
Share on other sites

Didn't the GRP A regs state that the exhaust manifold had to remain standard from the head to the first join? Hence the VL Walky had individual exhaust runners about 3-4"long from the head, after which the exhaust was free.

If that's the case, how would Gibson have homologated this manifold? Or did turbo engines have a different set of rules?

They put the one they made in a Nissan box and showed the scrutineers. Not like any one knew what the cars had back in Japan anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/#findComment-7074131
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

And make a 4 inch side pipe as well.

Was amazing watching Skaife race one eariler in the year at PI Historics.

Coming out of the final turn and flat shifting down the straight... eargasm!

Sure was a great day.

You can't compare the Gibson to any other manifold, it is made from a special material with sand bent one piece runners. I can try and get some manifold pics next year at PI if you like, all the Gibson cars are together in the pits.

post-63525-0-36808500-1384730407_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-45866700-1384730560_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433757-gibson-hr31/#findComment-7111241
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
    • Hi.. Just another problem. So maybe you can help. I(my mechanic) done swap from my RB20DE NEO to RB25DET NEO. Everything is OK but we have a boost cut. Coils/Plugs are ok...AFM is ok. ECU is ok. I have Walbro 255 but it "changed" sound few months ago(you can hear it ouside) you did not hear that when it was new(maybe faulty?) Sooo...what now? What can cause this boost cut? It is even when you standing still...
×
×
  • Create New...