Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Put a V8 in it.

Or, you can turbo your RB30E, it's been done plenty of times. Have a search, look on the R31 Skyline Club as well.

If you want twin cam, drop an RB25DET in and do the wiring. Worry about 3L bottom end later.

But since you want a fast reliable car, spend $20k on a 25/30 + all other things required to make it reliable.

For a VL commodore :-) street use but powerful to make pretty good times on the 1/4 mile, so I want a fast realiable car

Cheap, reliable, fast,

You can only have two.

Actually he can have all 3, turbo the RB30E.

If it blows a replacement motor costs a case of beer, and we all know you don't need a DOHC head to make an RB30 perform.

Do the following:

high mount manifold (ask hypergear if BRAE make one and he can get you a discount)

50mm gate from hypergear

hypergear G3 turbo

fmic

tbe

adaptronic ecu (order from hypergear with your turbo and gate) + tune

decent injectors around 1kcc

regrind cam to a decent turbo profile (must be done to make decent power)

Totals about $6,000 if you shop smart.

Add another 2k if you plan to run an RB25 box. Another 1k for a clutch that will hold the power.

It may seem cheaper to slap in a stock RB25 but then you will only need to spend the above 6k on that to make it go fast once you are bored of 150rwkw.

I reckon that answers all your questions in one hit. Thread closed.

OP, before even considering anything why don't you just get that RB25DET running in the first place?

I saw in another post you were asking about "turbo pipe"... get the car running first, then build your knowledge by reading up 10000000000000000000000 other threads about power.

Cheap dirty 30 because as far as the authorities are concerned it has a 30 from the factory .

Anyone who's anyone would be less concerned about a twin cam VL than an RB30 in a Skyline 33 or 34 .

Build it up the std cheap way (rods/NA pistons) and with a Neo turbo head , smaller chambers , the CR should be manageable .

More part throttle torque in a 30 than a 25 and being 20% larger is in theory doing everything the 25 does at 7000 from under 6 . VLs have tall gearing

Lastly you lose the dinosaur distributor / cap / leads with twin cam heads .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...