Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anybody else see the quiz between Seb and Dan. Dan was asked if he knew what Multi 21 was. They laughed and said it needs to be Multi 31 now...Dan joked he wouldnt mind as Multi 31 would help him...Vettel laughed and under his breath joked would maybe have the same ending LOL...will be interesting watchng the both of them struggle with what appears like a bit of a dog of a car

Well keen to see if Hamilton cane be a thinking driver/ History has shown he cant...Rosberg could easily have his measure as mentally think he runs circles around Lewis. Letsface it if Nicole is on her rags Hamo is a mess

True.

Homo has a very brutal driving style and can't look after his tyres.

Methinks he will have trouble adjusting this year.

Whilst I am stoked for Williams I am gutted for Lotus and Romain. If things are as bad as they appear I can only hope that Boullier is in peoples ears over at McLaren and he could be in the frame for Buttons seat.

This will be an interesting year for Button. Talented driver but I think he is the luckiest WDC in recent history and not worthy of a top 3 team seat. Like a girl who has agreat personality-UGLY, A driver who is smooth, conistant and easy on tyres = SH!TE!

But worse than Lewis, Romain has a tendency to implode and a bad year at Lotus will see if his mental strength has improved

Well I am more worried that Lotus will implode than Romain - what with their debt, shite renault powerplants and a late car.

Anyway I may not have been paying attention but have team Abu Dhabi been showing any great speed in preseason with Kimi & Fernando?

Looks to be a year for anything with an MB powerplant. Hoping McLaren can get their shit together too.

Maldonado: Lotus "Best Decision ever"

It must feel like a great decision going to a team that only wanted you for your money, doesn't make the car on time, has issues during testing, while your old team stands out during testing and looks really promising for the year.

I like Lotus, but Maldonado is by far my least favourite driver on the grid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...