Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So Mark has signed on with Ch 10 for next years commentary team. Hopefully this means that hack Jones gets the boot, as jones doesn't like MW from previous comments....

Awesome!

Mark hasn't been out of the game long so his insight will be more up to date then jones.

So Mark has signed on with Ch 10 for next years commentary team. Hopefully this means that hack Jones gets the boot, as jones doesn't like MW from previous comments....

sweet.

No disrespect to Jones, but it will be good to get some fresh blood as commentary with One/Ten

https://mobile.twitter.com/andersonlaura12/status/502456603845861376/photo/1

Caterham have a new nose to go with their new driver.

and they'll now have 2 drivers fighting each other to be slowest on the grid.

bringing in a 32yo never-has-been who couldn't make the F1 cut 12 years ago, Sportcar Endurance journey-man to try and help develop your F1 car at the expense of the fastest driver your team's ever had, and probably ever will have, is retarded.

/rant

Edited by hrd-hr30

let's try that in context, shall we...

"First of all, I won't argue that he [Ricciardo] is doing a good job," he said. "On my side, I think I have plenty of qualifying sessions where we had some sort of trouble. I don't remember all of them, in terms of what the nature was, but we lost out many times because of that and in the races as well.

"At some times it was obviously getting quite frustrating, but Formula One can be very nice and it can be very brutal as well by not giving you the chance to show what you can do. I'm not interested in comparing too much, because on my side it's not fair to compare.

"Daniel has had a smoother year - I'm not saying perfect year because he's also had some issues - but way less than I had, so it's not entirely fair to compare. That's why I won't argue with that, he did a great job so far."

http://en.espnf1.com/redbull/motorsport/story/171711.html#cDlyEqGS8SSOEk2R.99

doesn't sound like he's being a tool to me.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...