Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Ive been doing some reading and I've heard all sorts of things people have done to get rid of the hicas system on rb26's when swapped into a car that doesnt have hicas. A couple of ideas floating around are replacing crank and p/s pump with a rb25 crank n pump, something about turning the hicas part into a power steering cooler?, and last, taking apart the pump and removing all the hicas internals and then closing and sealing it up, but i heard this can cause your pump to grenade..so dont want to go down that route.

I would rather keep using the 26 pump and mod it to where the hicas part is for a power steering cooler, but if no one knows what im talking about with that then i guess i could get a 25 crank n pump. :/

Any ideas or past experiences would be greatly appreicated ! thanks alot guys!

Yeah, you can just pass the outflow from the rear half of the pump through a PS cooler, or just a length of pipe even, and straight back to the return.

If it were an RB20 it's trivial to just swap to R33 pump, but of course that's not so easy on a 26.

If you have hicas aready fitted, kits such as the whiteline locking bar include a bypass tube to fit into the rear which just circlates the fluid.

On our R32 GTR i pulled out the hicas rack, fitted a whiteline one, didnt use the bypass pipe included with the locking bar, removed the hoses etc and bypassed the fluid to run through the factory cooler.

Now my 2 Hicas steel fluid lines can be used as fuel return lines for the fuel system im setting up. :)

Yeah, you can just pass the outflow from the rear half of the pump through a PS cooler, or just a length of pipe even, and straight back to the return.

If it were an RB20 it's trivial to just swap to R33 pump, but of course that's not so easy on a 26.

ill post a picture of my pump so i can have a better understanding of what your saying but basically theres the two bolts on top of the pump that i would use regardless, and then theres the y pipe outlet that is used for the hicas from my understanding? and your saying to take off the y pipe and loop them together with no outlet?

If you have hicas aready fitted, kits such as the whiteline locking bar include a bypass tube to fit into the rear which just circlates the fluid.

On our R32 GTR i pulled out the hicas rack, fitted a whiteline one, didnt use the bypass pipe included with the locking bar, removed the hoses etc and bypassed the fluid to run through the factory cooler.

Now my 2 Hicas steel fluid lines can be used as fuel return lines for the fuel system im setting up. :)

car doesnt have hicas from factory.

Removing the vanes from the rear pump stage is easy and will work fine. Mine has been running that way for 8 years.

so you removed the vains and capped off the hicas port?

ill post a picture of my pump so i can have a better understanding of what your saying but basically theres the two bolts on top of the pump that i would use regardless, and then theres the y pipe outlet that is used for the hicas from my understanding? and your saying to take off the y pipe and loop them together with no outlet?

No. Not quite. The pipe on the side (whether it is a Y pipe or not - there's two sorts available) is the inlet. That is the fluid from the reservior. The outlets are on the top. See this thread for a nice picture of the system. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/372154-rb25-into-r32-using-rb25-non-hicas-pump-help/

Both outlets go forward and down to a mounting next to the radiator support. Then rearwards to the crossmember. Then across the crossmember. The front outlet reports to the steering rack (I think via the cooling loop) and the rear outlet reports to the HICAS solenoid on the driver's chassis rail. I think. You could/should follow the lines yourself to make sure.

Edited by GTSBoy

No. Not quite. The pipe on the side (whether it is a Y pipe or not - there's two sorts available) is the inlet. That is the fluid from the reservior. The outlets are on the top. See this thread for a nice picture of the system. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/372154-rb25-into-r32-using-rb25-non-hicas-pump-help/

Both outlets go forward and down to a mounting next to the radiator support. Then rearwards to the crossmember. Then across the crossmember. The front outlet reports to the steering rack (I think via the cooling loop) and the rear outlet reports to the HICAS solenoid on the driver's chassis rail. I think. You could/should follow the lines yourself to make sure.

i checked out the link. I get what your saying about the Y pipe being the inlet from the reservior, and the two at the top are outlets for the rack. now when you started talking about the rear outlets report to the Hicas solenoid on drivers chassis rail, i dont think i have one of those since car doesnt have hicas from factory (240sx s14). I can go snap a picture of my steering rack if that helps?

i checked out the link. I get what your saying about the Y pipe being the inlet from the reservior, and the two at the top are outlets for the rack. now when you started talking about the rear outlets report to the Hicas solenoid on drivers chassis rail, i dont think i have one of those since car doesnt have hicas from factory (240sx s14). I can go snap a picture of my steering rack if that helps?

Yeah, well, that's fine. The rear outlet on the pump is definitely the rear steer outlet. The front definitely goes to the rack. So whatever modification you do (looping the rear stage outlet back to the reservoir, looping it back via a cooler or removing the vanes from inside and plugging the outlet) you just plumb from the front outlet to your rack.

so i basically gutted the pump and then put it all back together without the gears. is that what everyone does?

Hopefully Duncan can let you know whether you should remove the whole lot, or just the little vanes out of the rotor.

Either way, you need to leave the front stage alone.

Removing the vanes from the rear pump stage is easy and will work fine. Mine has been running that way for 8 years.

This. Works fine.

Or just use a R33 GT-R pump, they don't have a rear feed and the pump itself it actually about half the size and weighs a little less as a result. Good for tight engine bays/conversions if you're close to engine mounts or similar

This. Works fine.

Or just use a R33 GT-R pump, they don't have a rear feed and the pump itself it actually about half the size and weighs a little less as a result. Good for tight engine bays/conversions if you're close to engine mounts or similar

I think its pretty hard to get hands on a r33 gtr pump in states, but ill look into finding one. thanks alot

Removing the vanes from the rear pump stage is easy and will work fine. Mine has been running that way for 8 years.

the vanes are just the little shims inside the gear?

LOL good job, you have now removed the rotors and vanes out of the front and rear chambers of the power steering pump. Now your power steering won't work at all.

For starters there are no "hicas gears" in the p/s pump. All you had to do was remove the rear cover off the p/s pump, remove the vanes from the rear rotor (not even touching the front section of the pump), bolt it back together and cap the rear outlet off so no dust can get in there. The little pieces of metal that go into the rotor are the vanes. What the red arrows are pointing to in the picture.

photo21_zps911e4ca7.jpg

Also the vanes are shaped like this, if they are installed the wrong way they will chew the shit out of the housing. Make sure you install them the right way when you reinstall the rotor and vanes back into the front chamber.

dfg.png

LOL good job, you have now removed the rotors and vanes out of the front and rear chambers of the power steering pump. Now your power steering won't work at all.

For starters there are no "hicas gears" in the p/s pump. All you had to do was remove the rear cover off the p/s pump, remove the vanes from the rear rotor (not even touching the front section of the pump), bolt it back together and cap the rear outlet off so no dust can get in there. The little pieces of metal that go into the rotor are the vanes. What the red arrows are pointing to in the picture.

photo21_zps911e4ca7.jpg

Also the vanes are shaped like this, if they are installed the wrong way they will chew the shit out of the housing. Make sure you install them the right way when you reinstall the rotor and vanes back into the front chamber.

dfg.png

....well atleast it only took like 10 mins lol .time to put back together haha. thanks for clearing that up man

Yep exactly what sick_r31 said. Just remove the vanes from the rear stage only, put everything back together, and cap the rear outlet with an appropriate size bolt and copper washer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...