Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah I'm enjoying watch dogs alot, but in the back of my mind I'm thinking its tried very hard to be a bit like GTA5 in terms of longevity, but I don't think its going to quite make it there. Campaign is probably the best thing so far, and the gang hideout side missions.

Gta v comparison. They've put a fair amount of effort into it. Not just a higher res.

www.gameranx.com/updates/id/22469/article/gta-5-ps3-vs-ps4-gif-comparison-of-multiple-location-shows-stunning-difference/

Also coming out in PC.

just going to dump this here:

"Ubisoft deliberately downgraded the performance of Watch Dogs for PC so that they could say console performance was on-par with the PC version.

Dude figured out how to fix it:

http://www.hardocp.com/news/2014/06/16/modder_enables_better_graphics_in_watch_dogs_pc

tSSjdXL.jpgV7J4wGc.jpg

EICf0qf.jpgNhUdcGF.jpg

YrFlVFk.jpg

"

man the high-res pics look amazing. the lighting is incredible. why would ubisoft do this to us?? why lie about how good your game looks?

(btw it does work and apparently an amazing mod for better performance and graphics)

I never understand why people get on there high horse about PC being so superior to consoles. I know that they are, but for me, the PS4 is for gaming, laptop/computer is for internet, photography and so on. The PS4 never needs to be updated physically, and doesnt cost as much as a proper gaming PC

PS4 is great for gaming in my mind, good for a couple of other things as well.

Not sure why PC guys get so up in arms about being able to see the nose hairs of the people on their games. Watch Dogs on PS4 is pretty damn good graphics to me, considering its only early days in PS4 terms

wasnt really getting into consoles grill, just couldnt belive how goood it looked and that ubisoft held it back.

images were a copy pasta from another site

Oh yeah, I wasn't having a go at you or anything. It was just a general comment.

I always see it, but I can never understand how it isnt easier to have a console for gaming (that is slightly worse graphics wise) and then a computer for everything else. I don't for a minute want to pretend that consoles are superior for gaming, but for me it just makes more sense to play on a console

Edited by 89CAL
  • 1 month later...

Finished the main campaign in watch dogs about a week or so ago. Overall pretty enjoyable game, if a bit repeatative at times. Just doing some of the investigations etc at the moment.

Sorta sucks you can't replay missions like in gta 5 for example but oh well lol.

Now what game am I going to waste my time playing

Scored my free PS4 couple of weeks back now bought wolfenstein. So far so good im liking it alot. TBH the graphics weren't as good as I was hoping but gameplay is good enjoying blowing dudes to bits with my lazer gun lol. Couple of sex scenes too lol!

FPS games are 1000000000000000000 times better on the glorious PC! PC gaming master race FTW

had a ps4 since launch, played it for maybe 6 minutes hahaha

Phag!

Wanna be better on PC as it costs $4564398765 to make a decent gaming PC! ;)

I agree Cal, PC is absolutely better performance wise. No doubt about that. But I really enjoy playing on console.

To be honest, I even enjoy playing BF4 on console. I know fps games are better on PC, but I enjoy the comfort and ease of console gaming. Just turn it on and play. No fk'ing about on PC's or constantly updating hardware.

Thats the point of a console I think. It's never going to be as good as it could be graphics wise but you just buy the game, sit down with a controller and play.

I am in no way jealous of anyone spending hundreds on PC gaming so that they can think they are getting such a better gaming experience. I have a pretty high spec PC I could probably game on, but it's not in the lounge room on a 55" TV

Thats the point of a console I think. It's never going to be as good as it could be graphics wise but you just buy the game, sit down with a controller and play.

I am in no way jealous of anyone spending hundreds on PC gaming so that they can think they are getting such a better gaming experience. I have a pretty high spec PC I could probably game on, but it's not in the lounge room on a 55" TV

This.

However we should soon expect a post like:

'but but but but but I can HDMI my pc to tv as well. And mine's a 70". And you can still get wireless controllers for PC. And my dick is bigger then your dick.'

urgh. sick of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...