Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anytime I look for diff info, the same came up : 1.5way good for daily and time attack.. 2way are SH*T, only good for drift.


BUUUUTTTT... I was thinking about it... if 2way diff are so bad, then why did the BNR32 ( not sure about the others) came with 2way oem ?

Honestly, I never felt my car dangerous to drive/handle... or is that because my diff is worn and not really acting like a true 2way diff ?

As you can imagine, I'm on the hunt for a rear differential and was wondering if I could simply buy a 2way instead of sticking to 1.5way ( which are rarer to come by on the used market)

It's because 2-way and 1.5-way describes diffs in about the same way that "Stage 2" describes a cam. It's not enough information.

The definition of a 2-way diff is that it applies locking effect on both accel and decel. There is no component of the description that describes exactly how much locking effect is involved, except that it is approximately equal in both directions.

A 1.5-way diff simply provides less locking action under decel than a 2-way does. In this case the name implies a ratio of sorts between the two locking actions, but still doesn't say exactly how strong the locking action(s) is(are).

The factory R32 diff is a 2-way diff, sure. But who says it has the same degree of locking action that a tight-as-f**k aftermarket diff has?

I wouldn't use a 2-way (aftermarket) on a daily unless I absolutely needed it for some other part of that car's usage pattern, because they're not pleasant to live with. And also, unless you allow for it or drive aggressively to overcome it, the added understeer caused by a stiff 2-way diff can be not fun also.

1, 1.5 or 2 way is not really the issue in daily driving as said above, the issue is how "tight" or aggressively the diff locks.

a standard gtr diff is 2 way but not tight and you will never notice it as an issue in daily driving.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...