Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think both sides (talking globally here; not talking about people in this thread) have an arrogance that pisses each other off.

Cyclists that flaunt themselves on the road, taking liberties just to piss people off, and motorists that think the world revolves around them (ahem mums on the school run....) and nothing should ever get in their way.

Sounds to me like Daleo is a good example of a responsible cyclist, he isn't going to be the one taking up a whole lane on a single lane road, he'll wave you past when it's safe to do so. In turn, and in respect of that, I'd pass him giving him as much room as I safely can. That's all that needs to happen.

  • Like 2

I think both sides (talking globally here; not talking about people in this thread) have an arrogance that pisses each other off.

Cyclists that flaunt themselves on the road, taking liberties just to piss people off, and motorists that think the world revolves around them (ahem mums on the school run....) and nothing should ever get in their way.

Sounds to me like Daleo is a good example of a responsible cyclist, he isn't going to be the one taking up a whole lane on a single lane road, he'll wave you past when it's safe to do so. In turn, and in respect of that, I'd pass him giving him as much room as I safely can. That's all that needs to happen.

this.

and when I ride, I keep to the opposite side, so I can see on coming traffic.

I ride on the road(when no brake down/bike lanes are available), and move onto the mud/grass/gravel when a car does approach.

I want to see them coming.

that way, I can react accordingly.

I also dont wear a helmet (lets not get into that debate atm), and have never been booked for not.

but...

if I do get booked, my reaction will be taking an entire lane the entire trip.

because, thats the law....

dont ride much anymore, so doubt it will ever happen.

aaand, go...

this.

and when I ride, I keep to the opposite side, so I can see on coming traffic.

I ride on the road(when no brake down/bike lanes are available), and move onto the mud/grass/gravel when a car does approach.

I want to see them coming.

that way, I can react accordingly.

I also dont wear a helmet (lets not get into that debate atm), and have never been booked for not.

but...

if I do get booked, my reaction will be taking an entire lane the entire trip.

because, thats the law....

dont ride much anymore, so doubt it will ever happen.

aaand, go...

How is your crank bearing....?

Here's an interesting article from the US about the "Idaho Stop".
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/9/5691098/why-cyclists-should-be-able-to-roll-through-stop-signs-and-ride

It proposes some constructive solutions for getting bicycles off high traffic thoroughfares, which would be a win for both sides of the argument.

Not trying to inflame the situation, but there is some useful info in there, and the rule (or a version of it under a different name) has been in use in states across the US with fewer negative outcomes than the status quo.

Here's an interesting article from the US about the "Idaho Stop".

http://www.vox.com/2014/5/9/5691098/why-cyclists-should-be-able-to-roll-through-stop-signs-and-ride

It proposes some constructive solutions for getting bicycles off high traffic thoroughfares, which would be a win for both sides of the argument.

Not trying to inflame the situation, but there is some useful info in there, and the rule (or a version of it under a different name) has been in use in states across the US with fewer negative outcomes than the status quo.

Yeah, apparently cars are exempt from the laws of physics. Spot that line in there?

Frankly, I didn't think it was a very well written article, and it didn't sway my opinion that it is safer to have enforced stop and red lights.

If governments were serious about reducing carbon emissions, they wouldn't be installing traffic calming devices, red lights etc etc all the time. Imagine the carbon footprint of a new set of traffic lights over its lifetime?!

But that's ok, cause the government gets the cash from the fuel excise.... :/

Did you see the main point in there? Bicycles don't trigger the light circuit, so the lights will never change. I am sure many of the motorcyclists amongst us have blown a red for that very reason. I know I have had to many times over the years. Does this make me a criminal worthy of being stoned with spark plugs? Farkin wanker...

"Several states have similar "Dead Red" laws, which lets cyclists (and motorcyclists) ride through a red light if there's no traffic, if the cyclists have stopped for set periods of time, and if the light isn't changing because its sensor doesn't register bikes."

Yes, I can see that, after stopping for a set amount of time, the cyclist can proceed through the intersection. They might also be able to use that magical button on the side of most traffic lights that turns them red to allow people to cross... ;)

Anyway, thanks, when did I ever say I chuck plugs at cyclists....? I thought my posts were pretty neutral....

Wanker comment was directed at the bloke suggesting it.

Cyclists aren't allowed on the footpath, and quite often are clipped into their pedals. Magical button? It's for pedestrians. Yet again, there are no facilities for cyclists in most cases. These would need to be included in any bike rego process.

Wanker comment was directed at the bloke suggesting it.

Cyclists aren't allowed on the footpath, and quite often are clipped into their pedals. Magical button? It's for pedestrians. Yet again, there are no facilities for cyclists in most cases. These would need to be included in any bike rego process.

Carry a broom stick to push said button? :P

Then you can bash arsehole drivers who try to clip you, and also have a jousting session when you get to two lane bike paths! :D

  • Like 2

Bicycle jousting is the best solution this thread has produced.

Nice work Luke!

Brb, off to get a broomstick.

It wasn't saying that cars expend no energy to get moving from a standstill, just that the driver isn't the one physically getting the car moving again; unlike the bicycle.

Bicycle jousting is the best solution this thread has produced.

Nice work Luke!

Brb, off to get a broomstick.

It wasn't saying that cars expend no energy to get moving from a standstill, just that the driver isn't the one physically getting the car moving again; unlike the bicycle.

twasnt my idea, but I like it.

You shall be forced to mount the toddler tricycle for the first round of bicycle jousting.

Mmm K?

Nay, I shall be astride the toddlers balance bike.

Yea verily; it has newfangled yellow plastic wheels, and an ooga horn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...