Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all - I've got the gtr tuned with nistune, however I'm looking at adding another high flow muffler to reduce some noise (and adding a cat converter) would I need to get it retuned? Does nistune retain some ability to alter settings on the go?

might be worth a quick power run to check if the new muffler and cat have caused some restriction and

need some timing taken out of the tune, but if the tune was not on the knife edge it will probably be

ok.

you shouldn't need to change the tune....but if you are a perfectionist you might.... restriction on the exhaust side can increase back pressure and increase cylinder temps,... i wouldn't worry so long as you aren't impeading flow.

depends on how much it impedes the flow...

I tuned my car with a completely f**ked pod filter and then when I put a new one on (same model exactly) we threw it on the dyno just for the hell of it and the afr's were out by 2

I change the muffler constantly on the road, as I use a Varex muffler. Going to a more restrictive muffler shouldn't change the tune that much, but any muffler that flows better will improve the airflow through the engine, possibly making it run leaner which is more of an issue.

If you are running petrol, running a little lean would be bad and possibly cause det. If you are tuned for ethanol, it would likely make bugger all difference.

I change the muffler constantly on the road, as I use a Varex muffler. Going to a more restrictive muffler shouldn't change the tune that much, but any muffler that flows better will improve the airflow through the engine, possibly making it run leaner which is more of an issue.

If you are running petrol, running a little lean would be bad and possibly cause det. If you are tuned for ethanol, it would likely make bugger all difference.

why would getting better flow out the exhaust cause a lean condition?

yes so if you turn your boost up then sure...but making an exhaust evacuate those burnt hydrocarbons better doesn't change those hydrocarbons....right....so yes it does mean you can add more fuel to your tune and make a bigger bang.

Less exhaust restriction makes it easier to get the exhaust out, making the manifold pressure lower, meaning more boost and better engine flow with no other changes.

If your AFM was out of resolution then it would definitely run lean, as there are no higher cells tuned to add fuel. I would be getting a retune just to make sure. There can be a huge change in engine flow due to simple exhaust changes. Other reasons for running lean could include running out of fuel flow for the extra airflow, even if the tune is compensated.

ok...my brain hurts lol...i don't think i was relating the pressure drop across the cylinder head i was treating it as intake vs exhaust and not really understanding the direct relationship....i understand now thanks :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...