Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah - a great day out there, well run... Definitely improved as the day went on.

Thanks to SAU & Squires for the feed - was excellent.

GL getting the car sorted Ash - hopefully it's not that expensive to fix.

Had a ball in the "supercharged aurion-ish" - can't wait for Winton on the 30th.

Yes I did try and remove the speed limiter from the Evo. Only to have the battery go flat...

The speed limiter is gone now and car working fine. (Frkn Evo's)

I will never lend random Tatrix cables again, especially to drivers with flat batteries. :P

Some minor attention this week and I'll be sorted. :)

VP front end conversion? Haha.

Good day for it, shame I didn't have the car ready but it was oversubscribed already. Hopefully the yellow Evo will be track ready in time for the next track day. :)

Had lots of fun yesterday! Thanks Ash & Squires for the lunch too!

Saw heaps of cameras. If anyone would like to contribute some photos to a wrap up article/post pls PM me. All pictures will be credited to owners.

Some excellent times in this list and I'm happy as I knocked a second off my PB

Seems I didn't catch a chat with all, so hope to see you at future rounds. Shout out if someone was missed.

Dave do you have classes for all the entries as I've just sorted on times?

post-31752-0-77161600-1408246293_thumb.jpg

Double checking classes before I update the spreadsheet...

Class A - Mod 4WD
Paul Stephenson (1)      2002 Nissan Skyline     1:19.9460
Craig Ferdinands (2)     2011 Audi RS5           1:21.8048

Class B - Std 4WD
Michael Brne (4)         1989 Nissan Skyline     1:30.4155
John Richardson (4)      2005 Mitsubishi Evo     1:33.9810

Class C - Mod 2WD
Luke Distanislao (1)     1998 Nissan Skyline     1:21.4756
Jake Lowry (4)           1996 Nissan S14         1:22.6190
Jamie Graham (3)         1997 Nissan Skyline     1:23.5592
Mark Pisani (3)          1998 nissan skyline     1:23.6958
Matt Lowth (3)           2014 Lotus Exige S V    1:25.5522
John Packham (3)         1994 Nissan 200sx s1    1:25.8025
Andrew Collins (2)       1989 Nissan R31 Skyl    1:26.1731
Huy Phan (3)             1994 Nissan 200sx       1:28.0566
Simon Henman (4)         1996 Nissan Skyline     1:28.9231
Luke Schulze (4)         1996 Nissan R33 Skyl    1:30.2292
Owen Liberts (5)         2001 Nissan Skyline     1:30.7483

Class D - Std 2WD
Ash SLN (3)              2013 Holden R8          1:29.5013
Daniel Lee (4)           1996 Nissan Skyline     1:30.1862
Chris Starr (4)          1992 BMW 328is          1:31.8136
Dave Marinucci (5)       2013 Toyota 86          1:32.7643
Matthew Borci (4)        1996 Nissan Skyline     1:33.8268
Gorjan Tancevski (5)     1999 Nissan Skyline     1:34.0251

Class E - Open
Chris Thomson (1)        1996 Nissan GTR         1:16.0442

Spreadsheet updated, let me know if any errors.

http://www.sauvic.com.au/motorsport/2014_ClubChampionship.xlsx

John, the reason you kept getting the old one was because the link on the SAUVIC website is pointing to the wrong version.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...