Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also if you are building a new head and wanted to use big duration cams with big overlap you can sink the exhaust valves into the head a few millimetres to help stop intake flow passing straight out the exhaust valve during overlap. If you can achieve the ideal inlet to exhaust pressure ratio then you could make benefit out of the overlap without losing too much of the fresh intake charge blowing straight out the exhaust and being wasted. Should still get good blow down to clear out residual exhaust but keep as much of the fresh charge in the chamber for more bang!

Sounds like they are mismatching the intake lobe centres so they are phased differently to each other in each cylinder grouping. So they are basically opening one valve earlier or later then the other (depending on which way you look at it lol).

A quick and easy way to change the mixture motion going into the chamber. Trying to induce more swirl into the airflow pattern entering the chamber which will increase efficiency and torque through better air/fuel atomisation and more complete burning of the mixture.

Actually if you didn't want to use their cams you could achieve a similar effect by mismatching the valve lash on your intake valves. Set 1 valve at say 0.010" and then its mate at say 0.020". I have no idea what that difference might achieve in terms of valve opening degrees though. You would have to try it and dummy assemble and then use degree wheel & dial indicator to measure the difference in actual valve timing.

Pretty much this. ^ 4 valve heads create very little swirl. All the motion is pretty much tumble. Swirl is a better. It takes a lot of effort to create useful swirl through with split timing on the inlet lobes.

There was an outfit in the US (I think it was thought up by David Vizard) reworking heads somewhat radically - with quite different cam lobes and different porting in each pair to create a lot of swirl and apparently it worked really well. But it all went quiet over the last couple of years. Dunno why. I wouldn't think that Kelford's tech would be a massive difference. It's probably good, and measurably better, but not by big margins. I would like to see what it can offer though.

As to the idea of setting the valve clearances different to try to achieve the same goal......not gunna happen. Too little range of available clearances that will work (without breaking shit) and no real measurable change in valve timing.

Pretty much this. ^ 4 valve heads create very little swirl. All the motion is pretty much tumble. Swirl is a better. It takes a lot of effort to create useful swirl through with split timing on the inlet lobes.

There was an outfit in the US (I think it was thought up by David Vizard) reworking heads somewhat radically - with quite different cam lobes and different porting in each pair to create a lot of swirl and apparently it worked really well. But it all went quiet over the last couple of years. Dunno why. I wouldn't think that Kelford's tech would be a massive difference. It's probably good, and measurably better, but not by big margins. I would like to see what it can offer though.

As to the idea of setting the valve clearances different to try to achieve the same goal......not gunna happen. Too little range of available clearances that will work (without breaking shit) and no real measurable change in valve timing.

Thanks guys, I will email the tech again to know what's their definition of this split technology. However, considering my budget is not unlimited, maybe that extra 500-600$ would be better spent on head porting or put toward a front lsd Vs. tomei 252 9.15mm. Just a thought :)

Front LSD should be a mod VERY high up on the modding tree. DO NOT put that engine back in the car without one. You're crazy if you do.

I wanted to go quaiffe ( i know you have high respect with the quaife), but I can have a brand new nismo for 400$ less than the quaife and i spotted a cusco MZ ( scared it might be too harsh for daily since its rated for track) for 600$ less..

I'M already sorted with the rear, i will be using a 1.5 ats ''regular''

Some people are hard lol!! This build wasn't expected ( engine was rebuilt 10k ago, timing belt skipped and im back to square one.. already put 6k toward the EFR combo, considering i gotta pay labour + all new valvetrain component), I'm getting close to my budget lol Sometimes I tell myself, better to have a nismo, than nothing ( in the case of the front lsd, for instance)

I still love you aussies :)

Also if you are building a new head and wanted to use big duration cams with big overlap you can sink the exhaust valves into the head a few millimetres to help stop intake flow passing straight out the exhaust valve during overlap. If you can achieve the ideal inlet to exhaust pressure ratio then you could make benefit out of the overlap without losing too much of the fresh intake charge blowing straight out the exhaust and being wasted. Should still get good blow down to clear out residual exhaust but keep as much of the fresh charge in the chamber for more bang!

Good words bro.

Swirl and tumble in a 4-valve sounds good too from Kelford.

Big Mike. What cam would you suggest for the OP's engine?

I don't really know what he wants to achieve?

But if I was doing a street engine 500hp I would keep the duration close to stock and make sure there was no overlap (as there would be high back pressure relative to boost), go higher on lift without going silly and make sure the profile opened the cam fairly aggressively.

I might just choose the top spec Mines cams to be honest...

If you could get the above with Kelfords little offset trick then sounds good.

PS: Quaife front and rear or go home! If you own a GTR, you can't be a tight a$$, lol.

I don't really know what he wants to achieve?

But if I was doing a street engine 500hp I would keep the duration close to stock and make sure there was no overlap (as there would be high back pressure relative to boost), go higher on lift without going silly and make sure the profile opened the cam fairly aggressively.

I might just choose the top spec Mines cams to be honest...

If you could get the above with Kelfords little offset trick then sounds good.

PS: Quaife front and rear or go home! If you own a GTR, you can't be a tight a$$, lol.

a great all-around GTR focusing toward response OR, in other word, I want to be able to keep up with my friends 's R35 when we go for a little cruise :D ( I went from stock, to gt-ss, to -5s in the last 4 years). I'm not a dyno-queen. I'm sure the EFR 83/74 can get me to 600-650whp (dynapack 2wd) territories easily. which is enough for me, now I wish to make my setup as responsive as possible.

I think the 252, 9.15mm will be the choice. selling my type-B shouldn't be too hard.

Off topic : on my to-do list, I still wish to replace my ts3b for a Coppermix Comp, my sard 700cc for ID1000, spline gear for my oem n1 gear, front lsd, 3.5 inch catback for my 3 inch catback, mechman 170amp for the oem one. type R for my type-B. Surely, I'm forgetting stuff lol

Edited by cobrAA

They're an Alfa Romeo NA lobe which uses a 32 mm base circle (stock lifters). Camtech grind them up.

I'll get the specs one day and post them up. But what we wanted was short duration and biggish lift with an agro ramp rate. HKS step 2 springs wernt enough to keep the bucket on the lobe with anything more than 19 psi and 5700 rpm iirc.

After spinning up a JUN 264 at 10.5 and Tomei 270 at 10.25, Yavuz located this lobe and used it.

There is another set. 262 at 11.3 iirc, once again with an agro rate.

I'll get the finer details next time I'm out there (if he is ok with making the info public).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Apologies for the long post, but needed somewhere to lay out the entire timeline of events and actions taken:   I've got an 89 GTR with a R34 RB in it. It's been running great all year, driven probably 500KM in the last month. It's not my daily driver, just a weekend fun car.    Build info: R34 RB26 - HKS 2.7 stroker kit, HKS adjustable cam gears, HKS turbo upgrades, Trust intercooler, R34 factory DENSO 440cc injectors, JUN chipped/tuned R32 ECU. All of this work was performed in Japan back in 2019.    Thursday 10/2/25 - It's a nice day and decided I'll drive it to work, I start it up in the garage and I notice it took a few extra cranks and sounded a bit funny. I figure maybe it was just because it was a pretty chilly morning. I pull it out into the driveway to warm up a bit before leaving. As I leave the driveway, it feels very off and sounds like a misfire. I pull it back in the garage to deal with after work and take the daily to work. I was able to diagnose it as a cylinder 5 misfire with the old spark plug test (unplugging each plug until a sound change with the engine running). I take off the whole ignition system, ignitor, plugs, spark. *Important note, it is still on the R32 ignition system with the separate ignitor system. I test each system with a multi-meter and nothing presents as a smoking gun. I put it all back together and it starts up no issue. I go ahead and order the PRP R35 ignition conversion kit. It should arrive today (10/13/25)   Friday 10/3/25 - Another nice day, car starts up great and drives great all day. Very pleased that everything seems to be OK   Sunday 10/5/25 - Decided I'll take it to play some golf, load up and drive to the course about 25 minutes away. Drives wonderful the whole way there, I pull in the parking lot and the engine completely comes to a stop. I do not recall if it sputtered at all, but just remember all of the sudden the engine was off. I roll it into a parking spot, try to crank it back on and nothing.  It'll crank and crank and not even try to start. End up getting it towed back to my house and push it up into the garage.    Items I have checked: Fuel in the tank Fuel Pump relay Fuel pump fuse  Spark Plugs & gap Coil packs Ignitor    I know the cylinders are getting fuel as the plugs smell like fuel after a start attempt. I tried spraying starter fluid into the manifold and cranking and not even a sputter.    I decided to do the live CAS test (removing the the CAS, ignition on and spinning the CAS stalk to see if the injectors pulse and spark is active). All of the injectors were pulsing and I have spark at the plug. The half-moon end of the CAS did seem very loose, I'm not sure how much play is supposed to be there, but it was more than I expected. There was no in/out play of the shaft, just the tip end that is pinned on had quite a bit of play.    CAS Play video   When I put the CAS back in, I stupidly did not re-time the engine. I know I need to do that tonight, however, I do not think it will start given it seemingly was not the issue. My plan is to do the PRP R35 coil kit and retime the engine at the same time.    I plan on ordering the Haltech Nexus Plug-in ECU once they are available again, but ideally would like to get this sorted before firing the parts cannon at it and potentially adding more variables.    Anything glaring that I am missing here, I'm a bit at a loss?          
    • Get it on a dyno. Get something logging Consult. Run it up and find out what is causing it.
    • Looking for a plenum for rb25 de+t neo  Not looking to push much power maybe 300kw at the wheels, is there much difference in flow for Freddy “Greddy style” compared to original Greddy or options like Proflow or Otaku garage?    I won’t be porting the de Neo head for now as I think it’ll be fine 280-300rwkw but appreciate the help and any experiences anyone has between them and any advice. Thanks  Looking at this plenum for now below 
    • engine wise almost no mods: stock ecu Greddy front mount intercooler Greddy forward facing intake w R33 TB stock fuel system, stock injectors, rail etc. Kakimoto racing hyper 3 inch exhaust system Apexi intake filter New NGK –R BCPRES (.8 gap) plugs  
    • Nice one @Pac - looks like a fair few 1600's there! 
×
×
  • Create New...