Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

also selling my kit as i didn't want to remove my ross balancer.

Cameron have you finished with this project or are going to try and design another kit?
has anyone thought about using factory cas for start position then something off the crank or flywheel>

Hi Robert,

At this stage I am done with the kit however if anyone is wanting custom changes etc. I am happy to work with them to produce one offs etc.

I do not at this time have room for different blocks and rotating assemblies to work on different designs.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Long time, no reply and I'm sure this will likely only help a few people but here is what I did to solve the tomei oil pump interference and smaller diameter fluidampr issue. Modified Murrayis's mount, rotated the mount, added a cylindrical spacer, tapped the actual sensor and I'll be cutting notches in my crank balancer. I'm going to go with (12x) .300" wide x .300" long and about .100" deep. The sensor is based on changes in magnetic field and should still pick them up even though the notches won't be totally through. Range on the sensor is .018-.080" inch. My .100" or so shouldn't affect it. I don't want to have a belt have the chance of getting freyed on notches.

post-136202-0-40708300-1454289032_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-55908800-1454289058_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-64283800-1454289078_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-43377300-1454289098_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-37808500-1454289122_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-81909900-1454289141_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48400800-1454289162_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48883900-1454289178_thumb.jpg

LOL...exactly. Trust me I felt bad grinding and chopping on such a nicely machined part, but hey it's working and feels totally solid. And I left my spacer short so I can shim under it and move the sensor closer to the crank pulley if needed after I really torque it on the crank.

  • 7 months later...

Hey guys just got my car tuned at horsepower solutions and wanted to share my results from this trigger kit. Brief description is its a r32 with fully built 2630 running a forced performance super 94 with all supporting mods. I used a ross balancer and trigger wheel with murrayis kit. Worked a treat with only thing to do is space it apart with shims. Below are some pics

20160522_113751.thumb.jpg.a82e467049f4d5167ec05871193ad2d4.jpg

20160516_193243.thumb.jpg.cb332520835c5625b6f532176fd62f62.jpg

20160424_104640.thumb.jpg.3a0aad1a0e744f964b1bc0477f75c68c.jpg

20160412_164559.thumb.jpg.f75bc517bac3dcc7434bb7c102cb1b86.jpg

20160831_173822.thumb.jpg.d2134200586f1558bde942c19b4d3039.jpg

20160522_113751.jpg

20160516_193243.jpg

20160424_104640.jpg

20160412_164559.jpg

20160831_173822.jpg

On 04/12/2015 at 9:36 PM, BlackBox said:

Hmm I really want to come up with a solution that doesn't require a gaping hole in the cover...

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 



I've already got the kit and got my balancer machined and re-balanced.. I am going to get a timing cover 3d printed to suit what I need

The last one I got was about $80, but that was for a CA18. Autronic sell them so do NZ efi. Just don't connect the REF to the ECU and use the Sync off the exhaust cam.

http://www.nzefi.com/product/24-tooth-cam-angle-sensor-disk-nissan-sr20det-rwd/

 

Maybe Matt could write different code for the CAS.  The Nissan one is providing 360 degree slots plus the 5 or 6 on the other circle.  The code might be easily enough altered to expect an arbitrary number of pulses on either of those.  Or maybe it would be a horrible exercise.  I'm not too au fait with decompiling the code out of (anything really) these ECUs.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...