Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so his trap speed was less but time was better with the extra shift. Wonder how much softening the suspension helped.

im pretty interested in this convo. I can see both points been a fine line and valid.

Tyres matter here also, if running slicks then the traction lose from doing this change is greatly reduced

This is where everyone is different and every car is different as well and you need to set up your car accordingly

I don't believe by throwing in short diff ratio and doing nothing else would result in a faster ET at a slower MPH, the theory should make that the other way, so what else was done to add traction

I went from 18" every day tyres to 16" drag radials with a bigger diameter and went 0.2 seconds faster at 2MPH slower due to traction increase

  • Like 1

Tyres matter here also, if running slicks then the traction lose from doing this change is greatly reduced

This is where everyone is different and every car is different as well and you need to set up your car accordingly

I don't believe by throwing in short diff ratio and doing nothing else would result in a faster ET at a slower MPH, the theory should make that the other way, so what else was done to add traction

I went from 18" every day tyres to 16" drag radials with a bigger diameter and went 0.2 seconds faster at 2MPH slower due to traction increase

he also changed the the ride height and all the alignment settings to get more tyre on the ground

he also changed the the ride height and all the alignment settings to get more tyre on the ground

Ah huh said the blind man, so faster ET can be put down to better traction from suspension setup but better traction wont lower MPH, that falls fair and squarely on diff ratios

Or possibly change gears less depending on your situation as you can afford to hold a higher gear instead of gearing down..... how long is a piece of string... it just changes the characteristic of the car.... some advantages and some trade offs.....

Ah huh said the blind man, so faster ET can be put down to better traction from suspension setup but better traction wont lower MPH, that falls fair and squarely on diff ratios

Bingo, don't let people know that because it "feels" faster

Or possibly change gears less depending on your situation as you can afford to hold a higher gear instead of gearing down..... how long is a piece of string... it just changes the characteristic of the car.... some advantages and some trade offs.....

So in this case, the 6 speed is slower because of the extra gear change. I race my car a lot and I can tell you the standard 5 speed and 4.11s is only worth replacing if you are having strength problems or want a dog engagement. 4.3's or Getrag conversions don't have a real benefit in performance.

Edited by SimonR32
  • Like 1

Bingo, don't let people know that because it "feels" faster

So in this case, the 6 speed is slower because of the extra gear change. I race my car a lot and I can tell you the standard 5 speed and 4.11s is only worth replacing if you are having strength problems or want a dog engagement. 4.3's or Getrag conversions don't have a real benefit in performance.

Maybe.... I suppose it depends on the application. Obviously Mines thought it's was essential for their setup for Tsukuba, so there must be some advantage there don't you think? Did not bad at willow springs either. I think Mine's did the modification for a reason and I am sure they did enough r&d to support their decision based on the r33 experience.

The 34 was only one sec faster and you can see the 33 labouring on a few of the corner exits. I am sure with shorter gearing the 33 would have been faster. Anyway if you want to see the difference gearing makes, just have the 33 and 34 videos running side by side.

Not saying it's better just different and maybe be an advantage in the correct application.

Hi guys, so took the r34 gt-r to wakefield yesterday for some hot laps. The car goes well with the -5 turbos, but I found the power sweet spot is between 6000rpm-8000rpm. If I shifted a bit early and at 5500rpm it takes longer to get back up to speed. Also on some of the slower corner where some cars are in 3rd gear I find my self shifting down to 2nd otherwise I'll be in 3rd gear at 4500rpm and no power.

First time at wakefield with the gt-r (last time with s2000 was 10 years ago) and needed alot of practice, my best time was 1:14, pretty slow I know, didn't want to post in the laptime thread was too embrassed, LOL. Could have gone a bit quicker with my old turbo I guess as I wouldn't have to shift to 2nd gear that much.

But in conclusion I can say the lag of the -5 turbos didn't bother me too much on track, felt better than on the street cause I'm always above 6000rpm in any gear. Might go better at eastern creek with less slow corners.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi guys, currently being offered a Greddy hard pipe suction kit that replaces the twin turbo pipes and afm intake pipes, just want to know if it will make a difference in my setup ie power or response and is it worth getting. Any one with this kit feel a difference at all?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...