Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here are some combined posts from another forum that are describing my problems.

From other similar setups it seems that 400 whp should be acheivable.

So my car is at a tuner and from what I can remember he said my car is only making 246 whp at 12 psi and when he bumps it up to 19 psi it is only making 275 whp. He said at 246 at 6000 rpms the curve goes flat and at 275 at 6000 rpms the hp falls off. He also said the torque is very low. He also said that he is removing more fuel than he should have to because the car is running rich at higher boost and rpms. He believes there may be a restriction in the intercooler or exhaust. This is what is done to my car:

HX35 turbo
I believe the intercooler is a 3" but he said it might be 2.5"
Stock throttlebody
3" exhaust with a Y that goes to a qtp cutout and the other side to the stock muffler
Freddy intake manifold
750cc injectors
Aeromotive Stealth fuel pump
NGK heat range 7 plugs that are new
Adaptonic E420D
No boost leaks
Stock internals

New oem coilpacks, rebuilt turbo, and compression is 170 on all cylinders. I thought I might have some blowby but the tuner said it shouldn't have power that low with some blowby.

Today we bypassed the intercooler using straight pipe and that made no difference. Removed the exhaust and got up to 290 whp. Have a q45 throttle body laying around that we are going to try. I saw the dyno graph and it's at 5000 rpms that the power stops increasing and stays at 290 until 7000 rpms but the graph isn't a straight horizontal line during this period. The graph spikes up and down a little bit. The timing is correct and it sounds really good. I don't think the throttle body will make much of a difference but I don't have any other ideas. I never had the car dynoed when it had the stock turbo on it but I always felt like it didn't have much power at higher rpms kind of like what it is doing now.

th_VIDEO0006_zps3rku8xz2.jpg

Kind of a lame video. I didn't tell the tuner I was recording so I wasn't going to take a video of him without his permission. I think everything sounds good unless someone has another opinion. Don't hear any misses or anything like that.

Couple of quick questions.

Does 290 whp seem in the ballpark for 5000 rpms with this setup?

Also is it a possibility that the vct is bad and not deactivating? I guess when I check timing during a dyno pull that would eliminate a bad cas and vct. I'll do that tomorrow and report back.

I also have a weird problem when the car is first started it has to be revved up to 2000 rpms a few times before the alternator starts charging. It is a quest alternator that I had rebuilt. Not sure if this is related at all just disclosing.

Thanks for any help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/454817-rb25-not-making-very-much-power/
Share on other sites

Don't know what it should make. Don't bother changing throttle body.

Do a run with VCT on and another with it off - that will tell you if it is working and also help to set the change-over point.

From some of the dyno sheets I've seen with similar setups people are averaging around 420 whp with the same mount of boost I'm running. They we're around 300 at 5000 rpms so it seems like my car is making power fine until then and then it just stays at 290.

Supposed to be similar to a gt35 I think. Plenty of people in the states get over 400 whp with this turbo.

There are about 3 million different variants of the HX35.

Only about 2 of them are any good in a performance application.

Air leaking between the intake manifold and the head could be a possibility but a boost leak test showed no leaks. The quest alternator is a common upgrade in the states because of the higher amp output. I had it rebuilt and they probably only replaced the brushes so I guess the voltage regulator could be on the way out.

Ok so there are only two variants of the hx35 that are popular that came on the dodge diesel truck and those are what everyone uses. 7 blade or 8 blade. I'm using the 7 blade which will allow more power but both versions will get me where I expect to be.

Just at a quick search it looks as though the hx35 is designed for 5-6.5 diesels with many design and specification differences. I can't find wheel sizes on Holset's site but from what some diesel forums say they use a 60mm ex. with an in. wheel varying from 54mm up to 78mm.

Here is more about the holset turbos. http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/247809-holset-turbos/

I'm running a divided manifold. The turbo is not the limiting factor in my setup.

HX35:

The 8blade hx35 has a 56mm compressor inducer. This is found on 1995-1998 cummins manual pickups. The compressor flows 52 lb/min according to the compressor map. The bolton BEP housing (0.55 a/r) is enough to push the limit of the compressor. There's several 500whp 8blade hx35 cars out there with the bolt on housing. It reaches 20+psi by 3500rpms in 3rd with 272 cams. Smaller cams would equal a faster spool speed in most cases.

The 7blade hx35 has a 56mm compressor inducer. This is found on the 1999-2002 cummins manual pickups. The compressor flows 60lb/min according to the compressor map and logged results from a member here. The bolton BEP housing with the hx35 turbine wheel do not SEAM to have enough flow to really reach the potential of 60lb/min. But many have logged over 50lb/min so far and seen 500whp. The stock hx35 12cm^2 twinscroll turbine housing is a t3 flange housing. This mated to a NON-divided runner manifold has produced a 132mph trap speed with a full weight 1g AWD. This is about 600whp. So the flow is there with the stock housing if you use a non-divided manifold. The spool speed of the 7blade hx35 is similar to the 8blade hx35 with 20+ psi by 3500rpms in the bolton housing and by 4000rpms with the stock housing with a non-divided manifold.

Here is the latest dyno 336 whp 295 ft-lb torque. This is on a mustang dyno.

Dyno_zpskldw3zhb.jpg

This is the ve map which seems too flat.

Fuelmap_zpswktnrvjf.jpg

Here is the ignition map.

Timing_zpsevtijt8d.jpg

I told him that the vct should be deactivated below 5000 rpms but I did a log and it is activated until 8000 rpms so this is probably where I'm losing some power now but I'm not sure how much that will add. I'm having some problems with my charging system but once that is fixed I'll take it back to get the higher cells retuned with the vct off and hopefully that will solve some of the problems.

I have a log on adaptronics forum if anyone cares to look.

Thanks.

I just did :)

Your VCT is enabled all the way to redline, perhaps try only setting at 100% between 1500rpm & 5000rpm (as a test). Of course doing 2x runs and finding the intersection point is more ideal - but I'll leave that up your tuner to decide on.

I've read that two runs is the best way to find the changeover point and I was positive 5000 rpms was the max you would want to change it over on stock cams that's why I threw that number out there. The base map actually had it deactivated at 5000 rpms but that is when it was making less power. I don't know if that was related or if something else was going on because somehow it gained power with it activated to red line. When we talked about the vct on the base map I misunderstood him and thought he said it was activated at 5000 rpms and he deactivated it but it was the opposite.

It sucks that the tuner is an hour and a half away otherwise I could have been there and discussed all the settings the first time instead of having to take my car back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...