Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

seems fairly normal

https://www.education.vic.gov.au/hrweb/Documents/Parental-Absence-TS-Guide.pdf


image.png.b7a18536c1a84e27867bd1d0c67cca2f.png

 

 

still anything better than IT companies in USA, we have staff that take 1 week off and back in the office. 

actually...
52 -10 weeks = 42 weeks
5 days a week
6 hour day
110ish K max salary


88$ an hour even with those stats...

300 an hour.....

378K....and yes I would switch for that.
well if you could get rid of the kids.
 

I am fairly sure at least some parents would complain of you disposed of their kids, how you do it is probably irrelevant.
seems fairly normal
https://www.education.vic.gov.au/hrweb/Documents/Parental-Absence-TS-Guide.pdf

image.png.b7a18536c1a84e27867bd1d0c67cca2f.png
 
 
still anything better than IT companies in USA, we have staff that take 1 week off and back in the office. 


If you even get paid leave. Aren't you lucky to get 3 weeks leave a year and most people don't get paid for it?

How the f**k can you keep your job on seven years unpaid leave?
6 months maybe... With baby, 12 months, isnt it?

And the week's you get paid by work, you're paid by government, yes? It's like minimum wage or something. Which is still more than doing PhD

I remember doing IT at The Body Shop, errrbody having babies or getting married / divorced, the amount of annoying name changes I had to do on their user accounts! Good place to work though & good benefits (nohomo)RIP to the I.T department though when they outsourced.

Got to check out those new Suzuki Jimny's at work, awesome little mini 4wd thing, beast. 

Edited by UNR33L
  • Like 1
On 2/23/2019 at 4:34 PM, UNR33L said:

Got to check out those new Suzuki Jimny's at work, awesome little mini 4wd thing, beast. 

I was looking at one of those yesterday, was in the perfect beige color, not what I'm looking for currently but that could be a chance in a few years.

 

Baffled how 88E can tank and then rise to even again meanwhile Red Emperor, whom 88E has a working interest in, rises 30% off effectively the same news delivered. Two possibilities come to mind: 88E shareholders are still touch and go shaky investors and possibly market manipulated...or...

Des did you throw more money in the bin?

Baffled how 88E can tank and then rise to even again meanwhile Red Emperor, whom 88E has a working interest in, rises 30% off effectively the same news delivered. Two possibilities come to mind: 88E shareholders are still touch and go shaky investors and possibly market manipulated...or...
Des did you throw more money in the bin?


Did you look at the red emperor history? 3 months ago it was at 45c, 1.5 months ago it was at 90c a few days ago it was back at 45c.
6 hours ago, TiTAN said:

 


Did you look at the red emperor history? 3 months ago it was at 45c, 1.5 months ago it was at 90c a few days ago it was back at 45c.

 

Volatile history or not, their 30% rise was still arguably a reaction to drilling results...case in point they didn't tank like 88E. Per usual we follow London's lead of optimism for some reason...they were happy enough to claw back 15-16% overnight and their par is pretty much where we finished today. Where management shits me is they probably didn't need to do a trading halt for an interim drilling update that more or less said "Looking okayish so far, still gotta finish the job though".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...