Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

use the AC Delco air temp sensor

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/GENUINE-AC-DELCO-HOLDEN-VL-VN-VG-VP-VR-VS-AIR-TEMP-SENSOR-COMMODORE-TEMPERATURE-/251111882110?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_15&hash=item3a776f3d7e

which you will need to fit into intake piping somewhere. The calibration table should still be available on the Wolf site, if not PM me and I can email it to you.

I used a plugin Wold 3d on my other car but it already runs an airtemp sensor so it was just a matter of fitting the new plug to those wires. Your Wolf will almost certainly have pins for the airtemp sensor even if rb20's don't use one, so you would just need to find them on the ecu's pinout diagram and then fit extra pins into the back of your stock ecu harness to include it in the wiring.

(***disclaimer I have never seen your car or its' wiring and take no legal liability for the accuracy of my post content)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7576419
Share on other sites

In theory if you are not running an AFM you can use those wires for something else (usually the MAP sensor or the boost solenoid) depending on whether the tuner is able to re-allocate those pins in the ecu... but since you need to add three things: a map sensor, boost solenoid and air temp sensor you may as well run three new wires.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7576480
Share on other sites

Wolf runs an internal 21psi map sensor. As I understand it the ecu itself is the standard wolf universal ecu, they just reconfigure the pins to the vehicle specific wiring loom and load it with a base map, making it 'plugin'. hence me saying it should still have pins for air temp sensor as standard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7576510
Share on other sites

I stated in your other thread that Wolf uses pins 1 / 3 for the air temp sensor. That is for the stand alone unit with custom loom. In the factory ECU - and hence the Wolf PnP - pins 1 / 3 are used to fire spark on #1 / #3. I don't know which (spare) pins Wolf is using for the air temp sensor in the PnP unit - you will have to ask them.

The engine will still run without an air temp sensor - actually you can turn it on / off on the handset. From memory, mine has next to no adjustment for air temperature, and still seems to run fine (I'm running v4+ on a RB25DET).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7578998
Share on other sites

I have this on my Haltech, and thought I had ended the world when I didn't have a valid ATS reading. Common wisdom is "BUT THATS HOW A MAP SENSOR ECU DETERMINES PRESSURE!!!"

Turns out... it's doesn't seem to be such a big deal at all, when testing the AFR is identical (or within 0.1) at a charge temp of 10C or 80C, corrections appear to be minor at best (if needed at all?). I got it configured then realised all the cells that I actually hit in regards to air temp have a 0.0% correction in them and don't seem to need anything..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7580852
Share on other sites

If you want your mixtures correct then you really should have the AT sensor working. But the most important thing is the timing correction.

Having said that, most AFM equipped Nissans don't have any AT sensor so they really don't have any timing compensation for cold/hot conditions. It's probably why stock ECUd Skylines seem top drive better when the weather is hot. The engine gets closer to the knock threshold and makes more power, regardless of the reduced density.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458538-air-temp-sensor/#findComment-7580869
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...