Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There are some interesting documentaries about the criminalisation and decriminalisation of party drugs and how some countries like the netherlands have clinics where you can check the purity and substances of drugs such as ecstasy, coke etc.

It is a big wake up call for us as a nation where party drugs are rampant amongst teens and adults who choose to take these substances in social situations. Now the reason why i choose the words social situations is because recently the lead singer of the amity affliction has come forward and spoken about his own personal fight against social anxiety and his use of drugs to combat those feelings. His story was not a pleasant one, with him knowing full well that drugs were only exasperating his circumstances and would have a detrimental affect on his mental well being in the long run. But! there are those who have found comfort in illegal drugs to overcome their mental instability.

For the partiers, one of the main benefits of these clinics are that unknowing people like you and i can take our drugs into these clinics and get them checked for potency and other substances, then are cross referenced to body mass, mental health etc to be able to have a clear understanding on where our 'safe' high is. The deaths in regards to illegal drugs in the netherlands have dropped dramatically since the introduction of these clinics, and yet developed nations like ours choose to neglect these facts and figures and choose to continue our losing war on drugs.

I am not saying drugs are good, i know full well they can be extremely harmful and cause death amongst our teens, but at the end of the day, saying NO just isn't working and we need to find other avenues to be able to come along side the next generation of drug takers and find out the reasons as to why they are taking them and the affects they have on their mental well being.

Those who talk shit haven't lived long enough, haven't experienced enough, and certainly haven't learned much along their way.

Being smart is a simple process of learning and being wise is a product of experiences.

  • Like 1

not fit for publication to be honest Kasko.

This is one subject that makes me angry beyond a reasonable and measured response.

I'll say Zero Tolerance which answers your question.

If I was capable I would punish suppliers with Malice ending in their death.

ISIL atrocities would look like a toddlers party in comparison.

  • Like 1

^^ Only reason alcohol does more harm than the others is because it is legal. Think of the damage legalizing all those drugs would do. Comparing alcohol to it proves why drugs shouldn't be legalized.

That wasnt the point of my post...

There are already many recognised positives for the legalisation and medical use of the substances i listed, the same cant be said about booze and thats been legal for ages. My point was that they are not comparable to alcohol at all - yet are illegal.

What would be the plus side to legalizing it other than it being fair because alcohol is legal?

Just making them decriminalised would allow easier medical reasearch is a start, especially after all the positive effects they have on some people, some are experiencing far better results than currently available medications. Then theres all the money that can be made to fund the country ...

Stop trying to be the "all wise critical thinker that is above everyone" and get off ye f**king high horse

:rolleyes:

Some interesting replies : )

I'll say Zero Tolerance which answers your question.

That's what I gathered.

The only thing I see that legalising drugs would be good for is medical research and treatment, we honestly don't need them as a social thing just because we should have the choice. People make bad and unreasonable decisions that effect others around them all the time. You can't honestly sit back and say people should have the choice because it only effects them. How about if they show up to work high, that effects their employer. How about if they decide to go out in public high, that effects the people around them. There are a lot more bad things that would come from legalisation of drugs than the good things.

Another thing that hasn't been mentioned is the part about social benefits playing a major part in funding peoples habits.

I know a fair few guys that I grow up with who smoke every single day and pretty much all day, it's been a long time since I have seen them and they haven't been stoned.

They all have no jobs and no form of income other than centerlink payments. My feeling towards that is that you should be drug tested regularly to have access to such benefits.

There are a lot more bad things that would come from legalisation of drugs than the good things.

But there isnt.

Nobody said anything about, ice, heroin, meth etc., if we were talking about those then you may be right

The things you listed are social problems, education and seeking help will help with that. If you go to work high guess what, you wont have a job anymore. People will learn and be more mature.

I agree with your thoughts about the doll.

That's what I gathered.

The only thing I see that legalising drugs would be good for is medical research and treatment, we honestly don't need them as a social thing just because we should have the choice. People make bad and unreasonable decisions that effect others around them all the time. You can't honestly sit back and say people should have the choice because it only effects them. How about if they show up to work high, that effects their employer. How about if they decide to go out in public high, that effects the people around them. There are a lot more bad things that would come from legalisation of drugs than the good things.

Another thing that hasn't been mentioned is the part about social benefits playing a major part in funding peoples habits.

I know a fair few guys that I grow up with who smoke every single day and pretty much all day, it's been a long time since I have seen them and they haven't been stoned.

They all have no jobs and no form of income other than centerlink payments. My feeling towards that is that you should be drug tested regularly to have access to such benefits.

I'll address the bold. But first you seem to only be focusing in on addicts rather than say medical users or even social users. As such I can't see a difference been a drug addict, an alcoholic, a gambler and to an extent adrenaline junkies

We don't need them as a social thing, true, but again how many BBQs do we go to where people drink, how many people do you know can't go out with the boys or girls and not drink and still have a good time? I know people who flat out refuse to be designated driver and if they are, they are the shittest person on earth to go out with

Yes people make bad decisions all the time, regardless of substance abuse. That is no reason to ban drugs because your judgment is once again just as impaired drinking or partaking in anything that you may have an addiction to. Otherwise ban cars because people make stupid decisions behind the wheel every day.

I've sent 3 people home due to being either drunk at work or still under the influence. I've sent one person home for being high. I fail to see your argument here, things are in place for this sort of behavior already, the old 3 strikes you're out policy applies. Sure it effects employers and families but no different to an alcoholic or gambler, hell even the speed racer who has a bad accident one day cause of their reckless driving

Being in public high? how many angry stoners have you met (whilst high), again I am not talking addicts here. Sure cocaine and speed can cause social problems, no different to all these heros that drink to much or have anger issues.

The last two points are linked, I agree that you should be tested for substances if you are on social welfare, but again where do you draw your line? Our current system allows welfare bludgers to drink or put the cash through the pokies, buy ciggies and other things that you and i may shudder about but their freedom allows.

  • Like 1

It may just be the way I'm reading it or I'm just too biased to see your true argument, but I still think a huge part of your argument is that people do it with pokies, ciggies and alcohol so why not allow them to do it with drugs. I see the medical advantages but I still see no social advantage to drugs other than it being fun to be high with your mates or that it will withdraw you enough from reality that you will be able to socialise with people.

My point about being high in public was meaning high on any type of drugs, otherwise I would have picked the word "stoned". I'm not too sure what type of drugs people here are arguing should be legal, you sound as if you are just talking about weed?

Stoned in public still poses a risk, they don't pose a threatening risk as in they will attack someone but people react differently. Some of the things I can think of is being vision impaired, slow reaction times, withdrawn from reality and more extreme side is paranoid or even hallucinations. There is of course the people who can smoke a few bongs or joints and they will just be normal and can be a normal people, but in reality as was mentioned everyone reacts very different to drugs.

I honestly don't understand why people keep going back to drinking and using it as an argument for allowing drugs, looking at alcohol is the perfect example of why they shouldn't be legal. Hell alcohol is getting tighter restrictions put on it every year! We have enough of an issue with alcohol as it is. Look at all the issues around pubs, drink driving, domestic violence Saying "well alcohol is legal, why can't drugs be legal" is a load of crap only pushed by users. Honestly allowing drugs would like alcohol look like childs play.

You also keep going on to say "addicts are the issue, social users are fine etc etc" It only takes 1 "social user" to crash their car into a family killing someone (or all of them) it only takes 1 "social user" that gets paranoid on drugs to do something stupid. It only takes 1 "Social user" to turn up to work high and risk the lives of other work personnel. Hell look at the impact drugs have on a family. It also only takes 1 "social user" to become an addict. All addicts were social users at some point.

Also can we ignore the medical side of things please? People have said yes it should be looked into. We are not talking about medical use. We are talking about the other side of drugs. COMPLETELY different.

Also can we ignore the medical side of things please? People have said yes it should be looked into. We are not talking about medical use. We are talking about the other side of drugs. COMPLETELY different.

my post was directed at the illegal side of self medical use. is that ok sir?

my post was directed at the illegal side of self medical use. is that ok sir?

^^ word there sums it up.

So as i said. Lets ignore medical use all together.

We are talking the "party drugs" or "social users/addicts" (social user/addict is the same thing btw, just how they justify it to themselves is different) Try telling your boss that you are a social user when you turn up high to work. Or when the cops pull you over. Or god forbid you have an accident and hurt someone.

my point is simple, you can destroy your life on just as many vices that are legal, why not just make some of the party drugs legal, collect some tax revenue from them, introduce a better quality product to the market that is regulated.

otherwise, become a muslim state, no alcohol, no gambling, etc

I believe in freedom of choice

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done.  
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
    • OK, so a bunch of trim needs to come off to get to the rear shock top mounts. Once the seat is out of the way, the plastic trim needs to come off. Remove 2 clips at the top then slide the trim towards the centre of the car to clear the lower clip Next you need to be able to lift the parcel shelf, which means you need to remove the mid dark trim around the door, and then the upper light trim above the parcel shelf. The mid trim has a clip in the middle to remove first, then lift the lowest trim off the top of the mid trim (unclips). At the top there is a hidden clip on the inner side to release first by pulling inwards, then the main clip releases by pulling the top towards the front of the car. The door seal comes off with the trim, just put them aside. The the lighter upper trim, this is easy to break to top clips so take it carefully. There is a hidden clip towards the bottom and another in the middle to release first by pulling inwards. Once they are out, there are 3 clips along the rear windscreen side of the panel that are hard to get under. This is what the rear of the panel looks like to assist:
    • Yes. Autos typically work from the speed sensor on the pinion shaft of the diff. I also think that even if you have a proper speed sensor for the bog manual in the manual box, that the signal it outputs is not compatible with the auto dash anyway. You should consult that manual (the book, not the gearbox).
×
×
  • Create New...