Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Long story short, buying a rb25 s15 - had a full mechanical inspection done and got the following results from the comp test:

#1 – 180 psi
#2 – 170 psi
#3 – 135 psi
#4 – 145 psi
#5 – 120 psi (145 psi wet)
#6 – 180 psi

Those numbers to me feel off, i didn't even think they got compression levels so high. Naturally, the owners then freaked out and taken
it to another place where the comp test came back 140 psi across all 6 cylinders..

So now I'm chasing a 3rd compression test and will also be forking out for a leak down test as well.

So my question is 140 across the 6 an acceptable number to work with (apparently a 90k motor out of an auto stagea)? especially when I'm spending upwards of 20k on this car.

Thanks for your opinion.

140 even is fine. Remember that it is not a particularly accurate test, so good luck trying to tell the difference between a "high comp" Neo's test results and a plain R33's test results unless done on the same day by the same person with the same comp tester.

The original results are junk. You should not be able to get 170-180 on a normal 25 or Neo.

Haha had another guy saying 175-190 psi is stock on these engines.

Do you think a leak down test will give a better idea on health of the motor?

edit*

factory compression is 173.5248 psi exact apparently. I should also mention the 140 across the 6 was a dry test.

Edited by Pulseless

Walk away. Too much variation. A compression test is not rocket science so no point in doing lots of them.You will find that it drives ok with dodgy compressions but for how long?

The number is not that important - its the variation between them that is a worry.

Yes a leak down test if done by a competent operator should tell you if the valves or rings are leaking. Again a variation below 5% is desirable.

Yep I got 170psi exactly on all 6 on a genuine low k RB25 neo. 10-15psi variation depending how anal you are.

Personally I'd be happy even with 20psi variation and just turn up the boost and put things in place to aid the inevitable blow by issue.

  • 3 months later...

I got a comp test done recently on my RB25DET Neo ('98, about 150k on it) just out of curiosity, here's the results:

#1 - 165

#2 - 150

#3 - 160

#4 - 150

#5 - 155

#6 - 155

It's within the 10% variation, just. Anything to be concerned about, should I get a leak down done?

Car is running fine, just with an intermittent miss, same as it's always had...

(EDIT: Not sure if above figures are hot/cold/dry/wet, will check)

Edited by V28VX37

I got a comp test done recently on my RB25DET Neo ('98, about 150k on it) just out of curiosity, here's the results:

#1 - 165

#2 - 150

#3 - 160

#4 - 150

#5 - 155

#6 - 155

It's within the 10% variation, just. Anything to be concerned about, should I get a leak down done?

Car is running fine, just with an intermittent miss, same as it's always had...

(EDIT: Not sure if above figures are hot/cold/dry/wet, will check)

I'd be pretty happy with that for an 18yr old engine.

Quote for truth. Plz take this advice.

I bought my shit box, didn't bother to do a comp test because I was too lazy and it was cold lol (had the gauge and socket set on me too) and still haven't done one 3 years later.

Also not to mention I screw in more boost than 90% of owners and thrash the shit out of it on the track.

Once it does grenade, I'll just throw in a 2nd hand motor and do the same thing.

Moral of the story, thrash it till it blows up. Leak down test or compression tests are pointless once you've already bought the car IMHO.

I'd be pretty happy with that for an 18yr old engine.

Car is 20 years old man, if it runs then be happy with that, then pop in new ARP studs and screw in tons of boost, bake tyres and smile

Quote for truth. Plz take this advice.

My neo has has 100 to 120 flat.for 3 years with 300 plus kw no blow bye or issues

Thanks guys, great response! And yes it's been running 275rwkw @ 20psi on 98 so almost double the stock power for quite a while now, gotta be happy with that ;)

how I see it (feel free to ignore)...

These cars are shit boxes that are fast, handle well and cost more than they should... they're no Ferrari or no 2015 GT-R, so worrying about a few psi across a 20 year old motor is pointless.

It's like a Commodore VN owner doing a compression test on their 25 year old lump of shit and whinging about a 20psi difference between the boat anchor.

  • Like 1

Those Buicks can be epic motors!

They can be, viz the Formula Holden stuff. But in original VN series 1 form they are a horrible, nasty, shuddering cheese grater of an engine, saved from being a completely useless turd by having stacks of torque at the bottom end.

  • Like 1

They can be, viz the Formula Holden stuff. But in original VN series 1 form they are a horrible, nasty, shuddering cheese grater of an engine, saved from being a completely useless turd by having stacks of torque at the bottom end.

I had one, shameless admission

in 2 years I had it, it went through like 4 power steering pumps, 2 alternators, 1 crank sensor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...