Jump to content
SAU Community

Std Rb26 Fuel Rail Power Limit?


mr skidz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just curious as to what peoples thoughts are on pushing a factory RB26 fuel rail with E85 on board to around 450rwkw?

When does the return line being too small become an issue?

For reference i notice the motive dvd R32 runs std rail with a 2nd feed at the back and managed 460+rwkw!

Im trying to keep the engine bay bone stock appearance which is tricky and i refuse to compromise on engine safety so if it needs a aftermarket rail ill get one.

Or ill probably just settle for less power to keep it 100% factory looking.

Cheers

Edited by mr skidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

slightly off topic skidz but just curious what you did on your induction side in order to keep your engine bay looking stock (currently undertaking the same process) and had issue with AFM's mating to standard airbox...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slightly off topic skidz but just curious what you did on your induction side in order to keep your engine bay looking stock (currently undertaking the same process) and had issue with AFM's mating to standard airbox...

not sure I understand your question.

what's wrong with your air flow metres and mating the factory air box.

Mine will be present but reading from a map sensor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over 500 awkw at least on petrol - read SK's comments:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112475-aftermarket-fuel-rails/

thank you kiwi I'll have a read when I get a chance but the issue really isn't the possible Power outcome on petrol as I know I'll need much less volume of petrol to hit those numbers but now my engine is higher compression and now E85 is being used I require much more volume of fuel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure I understand your question.

what's wrong with your air flow metres and mating the factory air box.

Mine will be present but reading from a map sensor

Cheers Skidz, wasn't very clear sorry but you answered my question anyway.

I need AFM's as I'm running a 'Nistune' ECU, you obviously get round that running a stand alone.

The Z32's I purchased are larger in diameter and therefore don't mate up to the standard airbox.

Now purchasing either Nismo items or refurbished stock items that flow more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a set of Nismo air flow metres originally but I was concerned with blowing hoses off and being stranded in the middle no where, the map sensor car should still be drivable so this is an advantage for me plus going E85 now so now it's haltech all the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock fuel rail/reg/lines

448kw on caltex eflex, 24psi boost and trapped 140mph few weeks ago !

Been running this setup for 2 years now as is

thnks sir, mad results can't argue with that!!

Only concerns the slight difference being the motive gtr and yours were both tuned e70 which makes me wonder when the factory fuel rail pressure would start to drop using the E85% content which needs the extra volume??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the internal volume of the std 26 rail is more than some of the aftermarket rails. Once dual feed modified they generally flow more than the mechanical limits of the engines they are attached too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the internal volume of the std 26 rail is more than some of the aftermarket rails. Once dual feed modified they generally flow more than the mechanical limits of the engines they are attached too.

should i bother with the 2nd feed then?

Or just try run it as is?

Im gonna give kudos a buzz tomorrow regarding there Bosch 1250cc ev14's with plugs and adapter should do perfectly

Edited by mr skidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are to worried. Many folk have gone 400+kW on standard rail

been so busy with work at the moment it's hard to research some of the crucial factors towards the end of this build that's all just making sure
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought id have 200cc spare.

ill need enough fuel for say 6 to 700 Bhp on E85 at any given time.

Add 30 40% for E85 should be fine

2000cc arent on kudos website offered as kit

Edited by mr skidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll givem a call tomorrow and see if they offer the 2000 in there kit.

Would be better since i wont be leaning on the pump with a reg to get max flow from injectors.

Edited by mr skidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wont touch the id2000 copies

sooo many failures... worse still is the seats wear and the injectors change over time.

this is the only injector we use for 2000cc and over http://www.aftermarketindustries.com.au/injectors-c49/siemens-2433cc-injectors-p218/

the real ID700s seem to be excellent as a mid size and the delphi 1400cc which are also unmodified are a much better choice for lower requirents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Transmission synchros feel pretty bad at this point in my car and sometimes the clutch feels like it has an inconsistent engagement point in the pedal travel. I figure if I'm going to swap in a new transmission I may as well also put in a new clutch. Obvious candidates are ATS's pull-type twin plate carbon clutch, Nismo Super Coppermix Twin, or some organic clutch option I haven't figured out yet. I have searched this stuff to death at this point and still don't feel all that confident in making a decision. Target power is not much. ~330 kW at the wheels max. I ballpark the torque spec at 600 N-m. The stock clutch feels a little light so a little heavier is ok but I would say no more than 15-20% additional pedal effort. For some reason most clutch manufacturers want to keep this stuff a secret but the Coppermix Twin is 950 kg clamp load so I figure it can't be too much heavier than stock. The hang-up I have is some people mentioning that the clutch is very grabby which sounds like a pain. The stock clutch is almost too easy to modulate so I don't mind if it requires more precision than that but I don't want to deal with something that feels like I'm getting rear-ended at every traffic light. Also I see some mention of the release bearing carrier sizing requiring some work which sounds like something that might complicate installation? It would be good to know exactly what is needed here for a 1995 R33 GTR. The ATS clutch is supposedly the best but I've seen some complaints that they wear out easily and also slip when cold. I don't know how much of that is true but the cost is also huge compared to even the Nismo Coppermix twin plate. It's also unsprung which normally I would reject immediately but supposedly carbon clutches don't need it. The higher clamp load at 1300 kg is also a little concerning but to me more clamp load seems like it inevitably means more pedal effort and also more strain on the engine crank thrust bearings.  This is a street car and despite being a weekend car I seem to spend a lot of time crawling in severe traffic congestion with it anyways so I will gladly pay to have something that is easy to drive on and will hold the power with no unexpected headaches. I really don't want to do a clutch twice.
    • Grease the poly bushes as your first order of business. Moly grease. Spanner check everything else. Inspect LCA inner bushes.
    • It's usually associated with a muffler. Often in the middle of the muffler, sometimes at an inlet. Not removable by just slipping something out. usually needs butchery (read outright replacement of the muffler). There's absolutely nothing magic about any Jap exhaust brand. Totally generic. Totally replaceable with anything else that will do the job. I've replaced the centre muffler in mine a couple of times.
×
×
  • Create New...