Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

i have a stock rb25 neo for road use. I'm considering my turbo options, current spec is gtr 570cc injectors, hks 2530, power fc, intercooler and the usual bolt on stuff

ive had plenty of skylines and silvias but never had anything top mounted so I think it's time

i have not got massive power figures on my agenda, but response and solid boost while not pushing the neo to hard. I've narrowed it to the gen2 5558 precision or the gtx3076 gen2, any opinions ?

i will either use 6 boost, sinco or a CRG manifold, v band likely

and need advice on a wastegate too, is 40mm enough? It will run 98ron and

I have a r35 gtr afm which I hope will cope ?

thanks 

I have a 7670 and personally reckon it's a big big for a stock 25. I have a 2.8 and wished it was a little more repsonsive, I don't think i'd be happy with it myself on a 2.5.

My vote is for a GTX3071, but if you demand specific power and only have access to 98, you may need to have some lag to get there.

  • Like 1
8 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

I have a 7670 and personally reckon it's a big big for a stock 25. I have a 2.8 and wished it was a little more repsonsive, I don't think i'd be happy with it myself on a 2.5.

My vote is for a GTX3071, but if you demand specific power and only have access to 98, you may need to have some lag to get there.

I'd be looking at your setup, there is an issue somewhere. Your 7670 is "coming on" at the same time as my 8374 and I don't have VCT. (All on at 3500 rpm rolling it on in second).

A 7670 would be epic on a RB25. 

  • Like 1

R35 AFM might tap out unless you run it in a larger pipe say 3.5" or run it on the cold side before the TB. 

I did a S15 running a R35 AFM, although in a 3" pipe without any air straighteners installed and it was hitting 4.8V each time it came on boost for a car only making ~240kW.

I prefer the HPX version of the R35 card as it supports more air flow in the same pipe.

40 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

I have a 7670 and personally reckon it's a big big for a stock 25. I have a 2.8 and wished it was a little more repsonsive, I don't think i'd be happy with it myself on a 2.5.

My vote is for a GTX3071, but if you demand specific power and only have access to 98, you may need to have some lag to get there.

@bri73y runs an EFR7670 on an R33 GTS25t (still RB25) on 98 and from all I can tell he is pretty happy with it's performance, he shared this dyno plot (EFR7670 vs HTA3076 on pump gas) showing the 7670 making near 370rwkw and 200kw by 4000rpm

post-53650-0-01542100-1411950907.thumb.jpg.979360db70a86ab60f1cf1bcb9379ba8.jpg

  • Like 4

Mr Lith could you pass on the final results of that RB25 you knew of with the EFR 7064 , think it was T3 IWG on the standard exhaust manifold .

Sounded like it was really strong for something with number plates , and not exactly lacking round town .

I reckon this would be really nice on a street Neo powered Skyline . 

 

On 16/10/2017 at 5:46 PM, discopotato03 said:

Mr Lith could you pass on the final results of that RB25 you knew of with the EFR 7064 , think it was T3 IWG on the standard exhaust manifold .

Sounded like it was really strong for something with number plates , and not exactly lacking round town .

I reckon this would be really nice on a street Neo powered Skyline . 

 

We still haven't had a good dyno session with it thanks to boost control and ignition issues - I think we hit around 280kw @ hubs before ignition break down stopped our last session, however we've got it holding around 21psi on the road now and no misfire so hopefully when we next get on the dyno all will be well.

It builds boost VERY similarly to an HKS GT2535, but with the EFR "transient response" and more turbine flow - so more power per psi, it's pretty good for a >50lb/min turbo.

Edited by Lithium
  • 4 weeks later...

https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/472431-r32-gtr-efr-7670-build/

Check this thread above^^, and read in conjunction with Lithium's comments in this thread to your question.

IMO the short answer is "no".  You don't "need" split pulse to achieve your performance targets.  But if you have the budget, yes you should consider it - but stay IWG for the relative simplicity of install.

There's enough accumulated experience that suggests a properly executed EWG setup will be a performance improvement on an IWG.  Comment applies to single scroll and twin scroll.

I wouldn't discount the idea of a well designed manifold/gate setup, and a reasonably high spec single scroll turbo.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...