Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have so many questions but would like to try the short version first so as to not bore everyone.

I'm hoping SAU will be a wealth of people that has been through this before and know how the system works. I'm in over my head and trying to get some facts straight before I commit to anything.

 

I have ( had ) An R34, Turbo, manual, coupe, it was stolen and thrashed for a night and dumped the next morning, more or less straight.

The insurance company ( not sure if i should name them ) have had the car at a questionable garage in Dandenong, Vic for 4! weeks.

The insurance assessor contacted me today.  Word for word:

"Mate, we're not going to go down the road of repair, we're happy to give you the agreed value (17k) if you can get down tomorrow and clear out your personal belongings from the vehicle."

Some people would not touch their car again if it was stolen and thrashed. I understand this.

I've also been warned from two other people in the industry to ' don't let the insurance people have it'

I haven't made up my mind and i welcome peoples opinions, but the meat of the matter is:

 

 

*I am not convinced the mechanic yard ( 1 star review on google ) has been honest, and done due dilligence. They reported the car runs, but has a 'judder' that the believe may be gearbox. However.. this is only from running it up the 50 m driveway because the plates were nicked and they aren't able to drive it on the road.... Isn't this what those trader plates are for?

*I'm not convinced the insurance and mechanic aren't taking advantage and stand to profit ?

* If my agreed value was 17k, realistically what outcome other than giving up can i negotiate? Would they pay me out for example 12-14k to take it on my own?

 

Keeping on with a 2001 model car might not make sense logically... but she's 8 years of work and love, and was in really good stock condition before this happened. I'm not sure that i won't

hate myself later for 'giving up on her'

34 GTT coupes similar mileage to mine are currently going for 25-26 on carsales.

 

Help, please :)

 

13 minutes ago, Little said:

* If my agreed value was 17k, realistically what outcome other than giving up can i negotiate? Would they pay me out for example 12-14k to take it on my own?

In this regard, it depends on the insurance company, I've had an experience with a previously stolen car that was written off, agreed value was paid out, i think it was about $3.5K, and I was able to buy the car back for $400 as that is what the assessor deemed the scrap value to be.

Buying the car back like this though you would want to confirm it's been classed as a repairable writeoff and they'll give you a list of repairs required to re-register which i believe has to be done by a certified mechanic or at least inspected by one(?)

  • Like 1

Negotiate with the insurance company to buy the wreck back off them.  Just make sure its a registerable wreck!!!  Don't let them write it off!!!

^^^Wot 'e sed!!!

 

I bought my earlier written off Stagea just because I knew the value of the parts in it. I had no intention of putting it back on the road but just bought another Stagea and swapped all the good bits on to it.

I would offer to buy the wreck. Let them name a price first - it could well be less than what you are prepared to pay!

  • 3 weeks later...

As above you can sometimes buy it back. This saves the insurance company disposing of it anyway so it's a small win for them. But yes make sure it's not classed as anything more than a statutory write off or you won't be able to register without getting engineered VASS cert etc.

You can indeed choose where it's repaired unless stated otherwise in your insurance PDS, and entitled to obtain alternative quotes. They have the opportunity to dispute in VCAT or your state equivalent, as do you.

However if they are claiming it is too much money to repair then it's unlikely they will sell the wreck for a lot (can't have cake and eat it too) so you can argue that they have deemed it worth fk all and good cause for you to take it off their hands for cheap.

If you don’t want it written off withdraw the claim. The insurance company is well within its rights to write the vehicle off. The reason they would in this particular case is because they don’t know how thrashed it is and can’t guarantee any repairs. More cost effective to write it off.

7 hours ago, Birds said:

As above you can sometimes buy it back. This saves the insurance company disposing of it anyway so it's a small win for them. But yes make sure it's not classed as anything more than a statutory write off or you won't be able to register without getting engineered VASS cert etc.

You can indeed choose where it's repaired unless stated otherwise in your insurance PDS, and entitled to obtain alternative quotes. They have the opportunity to dispute in VCAT or your state equivalent, as do you.

However if they are claiming it is too much money to repair then it's unlikely they will sell the wreck for a lot (can't have cake and eat it too) so you can argue that they have deemed it worth fk all and good cause for you to take it off their hands for cheap.

Stat write off you can’t register at all birds ?

They will only put the car on the WOVR unless there’s structural damage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...