Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently got an alignment for my R32 GTR, all still within spec except left rear camber.  Still riding on old factory upper control arm, and the eccentric bolt is maxed out.  They told me a new bushing will not make up enough of the 0.5 degree difference even if I get new OEM upper control arm.  Is that a fair statement?  How about the Nismo upper control arms?  All the adjustable aftermarket options I find all use solid bushing, but I still want to use tradition rubber bushing, is there no such aftermarket option?

SPw0oTl.jpg

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474192-r32-rear-upper-control-arm-options/
Share on other sites

I guess you are trying to stay within factory settings; have you also got the factory suspension?

If so, most likely the car is riding lower than it used to which gives more camber, you can measure the distance from the centre of the wheel to the rear guard on both sides to see if it is even. New springs may be a good idea.

The other, less likely, possibility is that something has been bent over the years. In that case a new, factory arm would probably correct it if you knew exactly what was bent out of upper control arm, traction arm, lower control arm, hub, toe/hicas link, subframe or subframe mounting point.

Thank you all for the information.  Yes I would just like to get back to factory spec, no setup for track or anything else. 

My car came with Nismo S-tune coilover, which only lowers 10mm so should not be a big issue for camber.  Front components are all Nismo, but but rear control arms are still factory, so they are 28 years old now.  Given how old the rear arms are, I thought just getting new ones would fix the camber, but my alignment guy had doubts because of how little adjustment the eccentric bolt can do.

I have never heard of Hardrace, they seem to offer a good range of products, but trying to buy them in the US appears to be a pain.  I think I will go with Whiteline.  Even though Whiteline only labels their upper controls arm to fit S13 and Z32, they are identical to R32 correct?

Just realize Whiteline uses polyurethane bushings instead of rubber.  Not a fan of polyurethane, so I will try to source a pair of Hardrace.  However, I found this brand I never heard of called TruHart also makes one for 2/3 the price.  Have you guys heard of it?

http://www.truhartusa.com/Rear_Upper_Control_Arms_for_89_94_240sx_Skyline_p/th-n201.htm

 

19 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

Looks like stuff off ebay.

Perhaps contact these people:

www.buyhardrace.com/

Yeah I emailed and called them Monday morning, no response until now.  $200 USD plus shipping and a 1-2 month wait...

I had bad experience with polyurethane bushings, but if I don't want to get those eBay junk then looks like Whiteline is the only option left. $160 USD shipped through Amazon, so actually not a bad deal.

I have early, limited run GKTech ones in my car, they haven't made a sound in 4 years, but the cheapo red ones from JustJap (I'd say same as the cheap eBay arms) squeaked after about two months of daily driving. Price IIRC was about $150-ish AUD per pair for the arms, so $160 USD for Whiteline seems reasonable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...