Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok. As per topic. Hope this is the right place for this post and yes I have read the RB30 Twincam conversion PDF many times now.

I just want to make sure, if a R33 RB25DET head with VVT blocked off can fit onto a RB30 block, then the same can be done for the reverse. I just need to block off the VVT feed from the RB25DET block and everything will bolt on, fit and run perfectly? Right?

Reason for doing this is because my RB30 block is already worn out, needs to be re-bored and 86.5mm pistons installed etc. Pistons sets are not cheap. RB25DET blocks are plenty here and I was thinking why not use them. Our RB30's here are all carburetted hence I would like to keep that setup.

I'm just looking for opinions.

Thanks.

PHOTO_20180710_175436.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474581-rb30e-head-on-r33-rb25det-block/
Share on other sites

Sounds like it will work. Timing belt length will be a problem though, due to the lower deck height so will take some thinking,  but on the plus side there is already the idler that you can choose to use or not depending on belt availability

I have already done two General overhauls, All the Gaskets plus seals, piston rings etc have all been changed. On the 2nd overhaul, the connecting rod bearings were damaged so we had to rebore the crankshaft and use 0.25mm bearings instead. Main bearings were changed as well. Our R31's odometer comes in miles so it has already travelled 238,332miles which is equivalent to 383,558km.

 

Edited by teng
2 hours ago, teng said:

Ben C34. Seems so. Plus the compression is the same for both engines 9:0:1

 

The resulting compression ratio is NOT the same.  One has a 500cc per cylinder swept volume and the other has 416cc per cylinder swept volume.  Put the smaller cylinder's head on the large cylinder and the ratio will go up.  A lot.  Put the large cylinder's head onto the small cylinder and the ratio will go down.  A lot.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...