Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok, now we are getting some good tech info, so the fuel pump , different from a rb25de and rb25det version?

what are the stock fuel pump differences/numbers?

 

so what's the recommended pump to put in with the rb25det?.... I see Walbro 255lph pump listed a lot, is that a widely used unit?

Edited by JC71

tank sending unit all reusable from the rb25de stock setup or will tank, sending unit or anything else need to be changed?

 

I am looking at the 255lph 500HP Upgraded Genuine Walbro Fuel Pump For R34 GTT Skyline RB25DET Neo

thoughts?

Edited by JC71
3 hours ago, JC71 said:

I am looking at the 255lph 500HP Upgraded Genuine Walbro Fuel Pump For R34 GTT Skyline RB25DET Neo

 

I had one in my old 25GT +t and it was fine, will cover a bit of headroom for more power as well.

Walbro 255 is very old. There are newer better from Walbro and others.

As Ben says above, define your power level, then that defines your fuel flow. That narrows your range of pumps. E85 being a big variable on that of course, both in terms of capacity and whether the pump is rated to live with ethanol or not. The newer Walbros all are. Older Bosch ones (044, 040, etc) make no promises to survive.

I am going to guess and say that the wiring, fuel rail, injectors etc. all don't "need" to be replaced when replacing the pump to allow function of the pump to work properly rather needed if looking to gain possibility of "more power" when changing out other items.

and does any one know the stock LPH  fuel pump rating on a R34 RB25DE and a R34 RB25DET?

Edited by JC71

The wiring harness for the injectors are the same between de neo and det neo, fuel Rail is the same i believe, when i turbo swapped my r34 all i did was simply change the fuel pump. The walbro fits and plugs in directly 

cool, that's what I thought, what pump did you go with?

I am looking at a walbro 255lph  as it seems to be the "smallest" I can find and figure that's probably close to stock. appears to be a in tank replacement.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/255lph-500HP-Uprated-Genuine-Walbro-Fuel-Pump-For-R34-GTT-Skyline-RB25DET-Neo-/111883558315

 

Edited by JC71

Yes thats what i used, its been working no problems now for 9ish months now. You can get new from amazon for about 90-100usd. Its legit pull out the old one and plug in the new walbro one, no headache or wiring. All you would have to do is cut A small piece off the bracket so it can fit in

Edited by Dil-Dog

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...