Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys just wanting a little info

i have a bnr34 with a forged engine i built years ago bottom end finished havnt touched the head yet. Wanting to push around 680whp on 100octane and close to 800whp on e85 in New Zealand.

mods so far 

billet gears in oil pump

cp forged pistons

manley forged h beam rods

custom sump 9L

oil returns drilled will also run a head drain

oil restrictor

plazmaman 100mm intercooler on the way

looking into a pt6466 gen 2 not sure what a/r to run looking on the t51rmod website as i want to do the t51r mod also thoughts on this turbo? Most likely divided also

or is a 6466 over kill drop to a 6266?

i will be getting head ported may even have cnc porting. Unsure on cams duration and lift etc? 
 

looking at maybe a sinco top mount manifold unsure on gate size also? 
 

have thought about fueling yet
 

this will be a street car with a few track events

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483844-forged-rb26-project-please-help/
Share on other sites

On 12/07/2022 at 2:01 PM, Dan BNR said:

 

 

On 12/07/2022 at 10:06 AM, Dan BNR said:

i have a bnr34 with a forged engine i built years ago bottom end finished havnt touched the head yet. Wanting to push around 680whp on 100octane and close to 800whp on e85 in New Zealand.

i will be getting head ported may even have cnc porting. Unsure on cams duration and lift etc? 
 

looking at maybe a sinco top mount manifold unsure on gate size also? 
 

have thought about fueling yet

If I were you and were sticking with stock displacement, while wanting it to be nice and responsive while also being able to do near 500kw on pump, and 600kw area on E85 then I'd go a Sinco T4 divided manifold, 1.05a/r EFR8474 and if you're doing headwork then go the Kelford 182B (260deg, 10mm lift) cams - make sure the headwork suits high lift cams, including clearancing.   

My assumptions here are that  you're likely to be tuned on a Dynapack (virtually everyone here use hub dynos) and RBs and EFR8474s are a match made in heaven.  500kw on pump is a bit of a stretch, and the slightly shorter duration cams I've suggested won't make that any easier - but in all honesty that setup will still work very well... whichever fuel you run you'll also have the option of ramping the boost up in the higher rpm when natural torque drops off if you want it to carry power a bit better at the higher end.

I know someone with 520kw @ hubs with an EFR8474 on BP98 and various people who have gone over 600kw @ hubs also with 1.05a/r EFR8474s, and they drive insanely well - basically significantly more responsive under foot than a 6266, while making more power.

In terms of wastegate that comes down to what the minimum boost you need to run is, twin 40mm obviously is proven if you go separate wastegates - otherwise something in the 50mm area is probably a good idea.   The smaller the gate, the harder it is going to be to hold a lower boost level.  

  • Like 1
On 12/7/2022 at 12:01 PM, Dan BNR said:

Seen a few people pushing some good numbers with the 6466 just dont want heaps of lag. Not sure which a/r to run

F4468A5A-F8E5-494B-8B41-826A6A292952.png

Those numbers are at the hubs, I’ve seen a few able to do 600kw at the hubs but none at the wheels. 
 

I’ve got a 6466 myself and on my 2.6 it was an awesome turbo. I am currently building a 2.8 and it will be going back on with a bigger rear on it and will see how it goes on that. On a 2.6 chasing the number you are I’d put a 1.0 divided rear on it 

My 32 with the 6466

On 26/08/2021 at 9:55 PM, BK said:

R32 GTR

Nitto 2.8 stroker

Precision 6466 T4 divided 1.0 a/r

Haltech Elite 2500

20210803_102311.thumb.jpg.c6b658e57953d00857a93d76421b1097.jpg

BP ultimate 98 RON unleaded

456kw / 611hp at 22psi

2021_8_26_21_31_14.thumb.png.ac568528cad575e9e7c0b532b5a4a878.png

A bit more on United E85 at 32psi

2021_8_26_21_33_58.thumb.png.977f0899aade625f6b167b4a32aa5219.png

2021_8_3_21_1_58.thumb.png.bc406de747dc46e0d3c8a20a66d3251e.png

Full specs on build thread

On the other 32 we've gone the 6266 T4 with 0.84 a/r

Just a suggestion i would 800 whp with h beam rods are taking them to about there maximum A beam rods are much stronger and rated to 1000whp which would give you a better safety margin. 

Bare with me guys first time iv used a forum haha. Im definitely wanting to stick with a single not twins. 
Is this what you guys would recommend for a big single? T4 divided 1.06ar vband out. And of course the t51r mod 🤷‍♂️😂. Ill look into those 260 cams. 
never heard of A beam rods??? Thought H beam were the strongest?

2A758AD8-A3D1-49F5-800A-DE18B4F3C006.png

Why the T51 mod ?

Anyway I beams all the way in both of our 32s, but arguably just or more important is the fasteners.

The 2.8 has ARP2000 3/8" rod bolts and 2.6 runs the highly recommended 7/16" bolts in ARP2000 which weren't a thing when we did the 2.8 on a 26 conrod (only RB30 at the time). Nitto and Spool now do 7/16" RB26 121.5mm capable conrods, so price not a concern -

ARP CA625+ 7/16" is the shit 👌

On 7/12/2022 at 3:20 AM, Dan BNR said:

Bare with me guys first time iv used a forum haha. Im definitely wanting to stick with a single not twins. 
Is this what you guys would recommend for a big single? T4 divided 1.06ar vband out. And of course the t51r mod 🤷‍♂️😂. Ill look into those 260 cams. 
never heard of A beam rods??? Thought H beam were the strongest?

2A758AD8-A3D1-49F5-800A-DE18B4F3C006.png

Pretty sure the T51R mod affects the compressor map and probably not in a positive way.

On 12/07/2022 at 10:20 PM, Dan BNR said:

Bare with me guys first time iv used a forum haha. Im definitely wanting to stick with a single not twins. 
Is this what you guys would recommend for a big single? T4 divided 1.06ar vband out. And of course the t51r mod 🤷‍♂️😂. Ill look into those 260 cams. 

Don't think anyone has (or anyone in their right mind would) suggest going twins for this kind of situation.

The exhaust housing will very much depend on what turbo it is, not all 1.06 exhaust housings are equal - there can be a HUGE range of what they will support depending on the wheel sitting in the housing and the cross section of the volute.   In regards to the turbos being mentioned here the 1.00a/r hotside would probably be ideal for the 6466, or the 1.05 for the 8474.

Btw here is a dyno plot for a 1.05a/r EFR8474 on an RB26 with big cams and a ported head on BP98, 14psi and 21psi boost levels shown.

image.thumb.png.ac91e5865938623d444f11d072330510.png

As far as im aware the t51r mod doesn’t affect any performance, wanting to do this just for the sound. I had a brand new t51r spl that i got in a deal but i knew it was going to be a huge lag monster so iv sold that and now would like to try this t51 mod out. 
 

i see a few of you guys talking about rods etc. my block is complete and finished so ill be running the H beams.

 

figures i want i was supposed to say at hubs not wheels just as a round about figure. 
 

Would you guys recommend the pt6466? 
 

the 8474 in my eyes is a ugly looking turbo 🤦‍♂️😂 you may laugh at this but im pretty keen on a nice clean engine bay so id prefer to stick with something that looks kinda cool too haha but if its really worth it then ill sacrifice it.

 

pretty new to all this so i dont fully understand alot of this turbo flow rates etc and kind of teaching myself as i go. 
 

another reason i was more leaning towards a 6466 rather than a 6266 is i may look at a rb30 or 2.8 if the late future not 100% sure thoughts?

 

keep it basic Appreciate it guys

Edited by Dan BNR
On 13/07/2022 at 2:55 PM, Dan BNR said:

Would you guys recommend the pt6466?

Didn't read my post above ? I run one and posted the results for you, so that would be a yes I recommend - will not disappoint.

On 13/07/2022 at 5:25 PM, Dan BNR said:

 

Would you guys recommend the pt6466? 
 

the 8474 in my eyes is a ugly looking turbo 🤦‍♂️😂 you may laugh at this but im pretty keen on a nice clean engine bay so id prefer to stick with something that looks kinda cool too 

Never considered Precision turbos especially aesthetic lol.  The EFRs are definitely an eye sore as default but imho if you don't use the BCS, BOV (using a blank plate), internal gate and powder coat the compressor housing or something like that then they actually are one of the better looking housings but that's all additional cost on top of an already spendy turbo.

It is definitely a better unit for your needs otherwise but yeah, should have lead with the fact you are happy to compromise some performance for personal aesthetic tastes - the short answer is that until a few years ago the 6466 was the absolute best option for what you want from it now, and it's still up there... So absolutely worth it if there are other factors which make it appealing to you.   No one is going to see it as a silly choice!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...