Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

New member here.

Im looking at doing a brake upgrade on my 1998 r34 gt coupe (non turbo)

I'm looking at R33 GTST brakes.

Can anyone confirm if R33 GTST brake callipers are direct bolt onto R34 GT?? (front and rear)

Even if the fronts fit and the rears don't or other way around.

If not, can anyone confirm which bigger Nissan brakes are?

Looking for any information I can get to make my life easier.

I know there has been discussion around this but unfortunately I have not found a definite answer.

Thanks guys

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484775-r33-gtst-brake-callipers-on-r34-gt/
Share on other sites

100% compatibility between R33 GTST and R34 GT. Both ends. Info is definitely out there, but people somehow being confused despite it being confirmed many times is somewhat funny.

The R34 GTT has larger bolt holes. It can be fixed by drilling 14mm bolt holes instead of of the 12 that the R33GTST and R34 GT has.

  • Like 1
On 7/1/2023 at 5:23 PM, calebwatttts34 said:

Different bolt sizes

33gtst fronts are m12

r34 gt and gtt fronts are m14

So they do line up!

 

As per Gtsboy you have 2 options. I still have some threaded Inserts as per what gtsboy used.

On 7/1/2023 at 8:30 PM, calebwatttts34 said:

My brother in Christ you drive a commodore, shut up 

Cmon man. Dont make me point out you drive a non turbo rb25.

 

 

Anyway good work upgrading brakes.  Given enough run up those rb25s can build a little bit of speed!

  • Haha 1
10 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

Then you don't have what you say you have, one way or the other.

That.

Maybe you have a GTT Knuckle or something along those lines. Or maybe R34 GT's really have a 14mm hole, though I didn't have that issue when I directly bolted R33 GTST brakes onto my R34 directly. I did have to drill the hub out to 14mm later though to fit a R34 GTT based kit.

3 hours ago, calebwatttts34 said:

Not interested in threaded inserts.

 I asked if they were straight bolt on. That isn’t straight bolt on

It is so close to "bolt on" that it doesn't even bear discussion. The original threaded inserts push out with almost no effort and the new ones go in with the same total lack of effort. You cannot even tell them apart afterwards, and you can put the original inserts in your back pocket for later if you feel the need.

Hell. I even have the 14mm inserts from my R34 calipers here, in a box, from, I dunno Ben...how many years ago is it that I put them on? 5 years? I could walk out to the shed and find them in less than 60s.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

No-one seems to have considered that R34 rotors are thinner than R33 (26mm vs 30mm). I suspect there will be a problem that the pistons might pop out if the pads wear too thin.

I would not bother upgrading the rears - the majority of braking is done by the front brakes. I suggest upgrading the fronts to R32 GT-R rotors / calipers. The rotors are larger diameter (296mm) , and thicker (32mm) than the R34 setup. At the least, GTSt rotors / calipers (280mm dia, 30mm thick).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...