Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Will back up what trident said.

Pull it again, and check the marks. Take photos of all the marks and post them.

Also check the harmonic hasnt spun the outter section which has the timing marks.

Also check you've reconnected everything properly, all pipes, cables etc.

Do you have adjustable cam gears, or factory ones?

 

When you say it won't rev, does it start all perfectly normal, but then you try and press the accelerator and it won't rev up?

Or you're having to start the motor with throttle, especially a lot of it?

If the latter, I suspect you have one cam advanced massively, another retarded massively, and you've done this by lining the gears up on the wrong mark. Been there, done it myself on an RB25DE head.

Car would start and run a bit, but was basically at WOT only it would run (and wasn't much over idle RPM). I also had an aftermarket ECU, so was running MAP not AFM.

yeah as far as i know all 3 of the marks are lined up (i’ve checked about 4 times because of this issue) i will take it apart tomorrow and post it on here

when turning the car on from cold i have to use throttle but idles fine. when revving when driving it almost spatters and won’t go much higher then 3000rpm

i have factory cam gears

the harmonic balancer has definitely not spun

 

10 hours ago, Cozzamb said:

yeah as far as i know all 3 of the marks are lined up (i’ve checked about 4 times because of this issue) i will take it apart tomorrow and post it on here

when turning the car on from cold i have to use throttle but idles fine. when revving when driving it almost spatters and won’t go much higher then 3000rpm

i have factory cam gears

the harmonic balancer has definitely not spun

 

Have you actually verified TDC cylinder 1 is where the balancer says it is? Has this engine been rebuilt at all?

11 hours ago, Cozzamb said:

yeah as far as i know all 3 of the marks are lined up (i’ve checked about 4 times because of this issue) i will take it apart tomorrow and post it on here

when turning the car on from cold i have to use throttle but idles fine. when revving when driving it almost spatters and won’t go much higher then 3000rpm

i have factory cam gears

the harmonic balancer has definitely not spun

 

Double check the AFM is plugged in too, AND both temp sensors are plugged in too.

 

Do a huge double check for air leaks too.

27 minutes ago, Cozzamb said:

not sure how i would verify TDC for cylinder 1 as i’ve just been doing everything off the workshop manual

Spark plug out. stick/screwdriver in the hole. When it stops going up and starts going down, that's TDC. Very hard to catch the exact top because the motion slows down as it dwells across the top, so you end up needing to look at the height of the indicator a few degrees either side of where you think TDC is. If it is at a certain height and rising at some indicated angle and then it is at the same height and falling at some other later angle, then halfway between those angles is true TDC.

12 hours ago, blind_elk said:

Sometimes, the timing light indicates the incorrect timing. How did you actually measure / set timing?

This is worth thinking about, personally I hate worrying about whether the inductive loop or whatever is all set up correctly. I just use a spark plug wire on cylinder 1 instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...