Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It will run fine, as the fuel pressure regulator makes sure the injectors get the right pressure, not the pump.

You should check the maximum current draw of the 255 is within the standard wiring's fuse (and therefore wire size), and if not you may want to take the opportunity to replace the factory wiring with a properly fused direct battery feed

There are some caveats to Duncan's advice for cases where the old fuel pump has been losing pressure capability at high flow (as they do when they get old) and the thing was tuned with lower than reg pressure in the high load cells. Then it could go pig rich with the new pump. Better than scary lean though.

On 1/8/2024 at 6:17 AM, JC71 said:

1998 er34 gtt....

If I replace the current stock fuel pump with a 255lph Walbro Fuel Pump, will it require a remap or any other things, or will it run no different and fine?

Depends on what the interaction is with FPCM and the FPR. If the FPCM can take the higher amp draw (up to 16.5A when stalled) and the pump can handle being run at the voltages provided by the FPCM + it doesn't lose voltage at full speed then it can be a drop-in replacement. If you can't use the FPCM then most likely running the pump at 100% speed will cause the stock FPR to be overwhelmed as tylink mentions and you will need a new FPR.

8 hours ago, tylink720 said:

When I did my walbro swap, my base fuel pressure increased by about 10psi, which could affect fueling a bit. I had to get an aftermarket fpr bring it back to normal pressures

That is unusual (noting you didn't say what size Walbro it is).  What was the pre and post fuel pump fuel pressure.

I have Bosch 044 in the race car and Walbro 525 in the Stagea, both with the stock fuel regulator, not issues.

BTW Josh good point about the FPCM, I assume that people bypass it when changing the fuel pump by running the fuel pump negative straight to the chassis.....the standard FPCM is calibrated to a good condition standard fuel pump so it might give unreliable results with an aftermarket pump.

9 minutes ago, Duncan said:

the standard FPCM is calibrated to a good condition standard fuel pump so it might give unreliable results with an aftermarket pump.

My 040 is wired up to the FPCM. Was done at least 20 years ago when the stock pump died, and when the car was making barely more than stock power. Fuel pressure was fine at the low end and the high end back then.

Has stayed that way through boost ups, 25 transplants, etc. And sure, the ECU has been tuned as a result of most of the big changes, but regardless, the FPCM has worked just fine running an 040. No meltdowns, no pressure problems, etc.

I must stipulate though, that I haven't been able to turn the boost up on my new highflow because the car was pinging and the ECU was going to panic mode, and it is quite possible that the 040 is low on pressure from great age and needs to be replaced. Maybe. Haven't had a chance to get it onto the dyno with the fuel pressure gauge etc etc, and so just dribbling it around on low low boost.

So, likely Walbro replacement might be a different story. Shouldn't be, but might be. Only going to need a 255 (341? 342? Whatever they are), and I think they pull the circa same current as the 040.

You should totally buy my 460 and/or 525 and do whatever Duncan has figured out so it doesn't melt :D

(or you may consider rewiring it to run at 14V, which is one of the most oldschooly mods in all of SAU, right up there with running 7psi all the time :D)

On 1/14/2024 at 6:16 PM, Duncan said:

That is unusual (noting you didn't say what size Walbro it is).  What was the pre and post fuel pump fuel pressure.

I have Bosch 044 in the race car and Walbro 525 in the Stagea, both with the stock fuel regulator, not issues.

BTW Josh good point about the FPCM, I assume that people bypass it when changing the fuel pump by running the fuel pump negative straight to the chassis.....the standard FPCM is calibrated to a good condition standard fuel pump so it might give unreliable results with an aftermarket pump.

I only put in a 255. Yeah I thought it was strange too. I had seen lots of posts on here saying the stock reg was good for mild pump upgrades. Possibly the oem fpr was clapped the entire time and I only checked fuel pressure after installing a new pump

19 minutes ago, tylink720 said:

I had seen lots of posts on here saying the stock reg was good for mild pump upgrades

and many of these posts don't mention anything about fuel pressure either :) 

I am certain if you put a fuel pressure sensor on most factory reg with bigger pumps/injector setups, you'll see unfavourable fuel pressures 

1 hour ago, tylink720 said:

I only put in a 255

39 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I am certain if you put a fuel pressure sensor on most factory reg with bigger pumps/injector setups, you'll see unfavourable fuel pressures 

255 should have been fine. Mine worked just fine (as in, fuel pressure is/was correct) with similar sized 040.

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

255 should have been fine. Mine worked just fine (as in, fuel pressure is/was correct) with similar sized 040.

log the fuel pressure vs. manifold pressure on a spirited drive, I believe you'll see unfavourable results.

7 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

log the fuel pressure vs. manifold pressure on a spirited drive, I believe you'll see unfavourable results.

Don't need to log it. Stood next to the car holding the fuel pressure gauge in hand as it was run across the full load range. It sat where it was supposed to. Was 20+ years ago though....

9 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

fuel pressure gauge in hand

liquid filled?

If so, yeah.. use a proper sensor and log fuel pressure vs. manifold pressure. I doubt you'll see a consistent 3bar delta between the two, this also applies to aftermarket regulators, albeit the issue is less evident. 

Well, the main risk with going to a bigger fuel pump is losing control of pressure at idle or low load because the FPR isn't able to flow the juice. So, if you manage to see your normal 43ish psi when you expect to, and ~11 psi or so less than that at idle with the sense line connected, and it's not wandering too far away from 3bar + boost at the top end, then you can't really fault the stock FPR (or any other FPR) if it wanders around a little bit in between. The FPR is a mechanism after all, and it will have hysteresis and a mechanical response time, so dynamics will always result in some local non-linearity and under and overshoot behaviours. You could gather a lot of data from logging that would make your eyelashes curl looking at those details, but provided it hits the 3 main points (or really only 2 main points if you discount the sense line disconnected test point) at steady state, then the reg is doing what it is designed to do.

With a low power RB, coming onto boost in the 2300 rpm range (actually probably worse than that, given that it was still a 20 when I did this), you can see the fuel pressure gauge go from reading 3 bar + low load vacuum (so, what? About 26 psi?) up to ~43 psi when the throttle is opened up full but no boost yet, and then a few psi creep in followed by the very rapid ramp up to 3 bar + boost, which in my case was probably 12 psi at the time, so 55ish on the gauge. All of that is fairly easy to follow even without being able to see the tacho, and happens slowly enough that what happens and when it happens either makes sense, or if it doesn't then it indicates a problem. And on a typical 6 bar gauge it all happens right around the top** of the dial. On a 10 bar gauge it's a little more compressed to between about 25-40% of full scale, but that's still quite readable.

I'm used to doing pitot measurements in process ducts where I have to pinch the silicone tubes down to damp out wild 2 kPa fluctuations in total pressure while the dynamic pressure in only about 50 Pa or so. By comparison, measuring fuel pressure on a car is something I can do without even needing a coffee first!

 

**And what I meant here was like at the 12 o'clock top, not full scale over on the lower RHS.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...