Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought about that one, however I don't know if the thread is the same ?

 

I believe this sensor tells the ECU when the power steering pump is working (especially for iddle)

Looking into r34 gtr and gtt service manual :

- when steering wheel is not turned : 4.6-4.7V meaning switch open

- when it is : 0V meaning switch closed

2 hours ago, bigboss59400 said:

 

Capture d’écran 2024-07-18 084451.png

No, by "the other way around", I meant 4.7V likely to correspond to switch closed, rather than open. You don't get voltage back to the control unit when a switch is open. You will definitely measure a voltage at one of the terminals of a switch when it is open, but it doesn't turn up at the other terminal (and hence then on to the ECU in this case) until it is no longer open.

 

On 7/16/2024 at 12:50 AM, bigboss59400 said:

I thought about that one, however I don't know if the thread is the same ?

 

I believe this sensor tells the ECU when the power steering pump is working (especially for iddle)

Looking into r34 gtr and gtt service manual :

- when steering wheel is not turned : 4.6-4.7V meaning switch open

- when it is : 0V meaning switch closed

It is for idle up signaling when the power steering is under high load. For example if the car is stopped and you turn the steering wheel all the way to the end of travel. My best guess is the thread is identical but unless you can measure yourself it’s hard to be sure. The R32 switch is generic for Nissan so you might be able to find one in a junkyard or a cheap aftermarket alibaba special just to check fitment. Then buy OEM new for actual road use. I’m unclear on whether the R33/34 need the clearance on the switch hence the special part requirement. 

 

10 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

No, by "the other way around", I meant 4.7V likely to correspond to switch closed, rather than open. You don't get voltage back to the control unit when a switch is open. You will definitely measure a voltage at one of the terminals of a switch when it is open, but it doesn't turn up at the other terminal (and hence then on to the ECU in this case) until it is no longer open.

 

I’m pretty sure 4.7V corresponding to open switch is normal. The ECU can detect it too, voltage can exist in the absence of current flow. When the switch closes as the impedance is very low relative to the voltage source it drops to near 0V which can also be sensed. 

Yeah, but that's not normal usage of digital input power to any control system. A switch shorting directly to earth can only pull down the supply side to "zero" volts if there is an extremely high resistance as part of the supply side - effectively a limitation to a tiny current. Otherwise it's a dead short that will just flow as much current as it can.

Normally, as in a PLC digital input card (and indeed, most DIs on most other Nissan ECUs), you will have 12v or 5v available at a terminal on the ECU (or maybe even from elsewhere). That goes out to the switch and only comes back to another terminal on the DI (and this terminal is the actual digital input, the other one is effectively just the supply). With the switch open, no voltage turns up at the DI. With the switch closed, the voltage turns up at the DI. And such inputs are also high impedance to limit current flow to almost nothing. But this is a lot easier to do on the sensing side than it is on the supply side.

I'm quite surprised to see Nissan do what they've done on the R34.

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Yeah, but that's not normal usage of digital input power to any control system. A switch shorting directly to earth can only pull down the supply side to "zero" volts if there is an extremely high resistance as part of the supply side - effectively a limitation to a tiny current. Otherwise it's a dead short that will just flow as much current as it can.

Normally, as in a PLC digital input card (and indeed, most DIs on most other Nissan ECUs), you will have 12v or 5v available at a terminal on the ECU (or maybe even from elsewhere). That goes out to the switch and only comes back to another terminal on the DI (and this terminal is the actual digital input, the other one is effectively just the supply). With the switch open, no voltage turns up at the DI. With the switch closed, the voltage turns up at the DI. And such inputs are also high impedance to limit current flow to almost nothing. But this is a lot easier to do on the sensing side than it is on the supply side.

I'm quite surprised to see Nissan do what they've done on the R34.

On PLC inputs, yes 95% of the time you're sourcing. In automotive, including Nissan's, 95% of DI's are actually sinking. OP is correct. You sink inputs to GND, thus you will have 0VDC with the switch closed. 

Edited by TurboTapin
  • Like 1
7 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Yeah, but that's not normal usage of digital input power to any control system. A switch shorting directly to earth can only pull down the supply side to "zero" volts if there is an extremely high resistance as part of the supply side - effectively a limitation to a tiny current. Otherwise it's a dead short that will just flow as much current as it can.

Normally, as in a PLC digital input card (and indeed, most DIs on most other Nissan ECUs), you will have 12v or 5v available at a terminal on the ECU (or maybe even from elsewhere). That goes out to the switch and only comes back to another terminal on the DI (and this terminal is the actual digital input, the other one is effectively just the supply). With the switch open, no voltage turns up at the DI. With the switch closed, the voltage turns up at the DI. And such inputs are also high impedance to limit current flow to almost nothing. But this is a lot easier to do on the sensing side than it is on the supply side.

I'm quite surprised to see Nissan do what they've done on the R34.

There's a lot of things that are weird on the R-chassis wiring/circuit design. Link highlights all the time how parts of the AC control system are always connected to +12V which can cause weird interactions that cause their ECU to brown out and cause no-starts in circumstances that it shouldn't. Nothing obscene, but just a little funny and no longer considered best practice.

Bah! I just went and had a look. Pretty much all of the switches that I would have expected to be externally sourced and sunk at the ECU (on R32, such as TPS, neutral switch, etc) were ECU sourced. And now I have to wonder what sort of drugs the automotive engineering world have been taking.

16 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Bah! I just went and had a look. Pretty much all of the switches that I would have expected to be externally sourced and sunk at the ECU (on R32, such as TPS, neutral switch, etc) were ECU sourced. And now I have to wonder what sort of drugs the automotive engineering world have been taking.

There's advantages and disadvantages to both. Sourced DI's are used in automotive for reliability (You can't short signal wires) and ease of use (You have chassis GND available to you anywhere). 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...