Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, TurboTapin said:

600-700whp isn't in the most efficient area and is close to the choke line. 800whp is well off the map.

I'm a little confused. The choke line is the far left side of the map, and you're on the right of centre. Did you mean something else? Maybe the dotted line running up the middle of the island? That's just following the peak efficiency line. It's nothing to be worried about.

9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

I'm a little confused. The choke line is the far left side of the map, and you're on the right of centre. Did you mean something else? Maybe the dotted line running up the middle of the island? That's just following the peak efficiency line. It's nothing to be worried about.

You're thinking surge line. Choke line is far right line. I'm well out of the efficiency islands and somewhere around 730whp would put me past the choke line. 

8 minutes ago, TurboTapin said:

You're thinking surge line. Choke line is far right line. I'm well out of the efficiency islands and somewhere around 730whp would put me past the choke line. 

Hahaha! You're correct. Total brain fart on my behalf. Sheesh.

  • Haha 1
43 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Post up your timing map :) 

Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno. 

Let me know your thoughts. 

Screenshot2025-10-02213520.thumb.png.7b73de8d7bf6f40b84734a0ada786194.png

  • Like 1

Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it.

What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it?

Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.

image.thumb.png.da11b8eeb07df6e2bc26b918573788ab.png

 

21 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it.

What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it?

Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.

image.thumb.png.da11b8eeb07df6e2bc26b918573788ab.png

 

Thanks for this! I can't recall the exact power per degree, I was focused on getting the new meth system going. I'll get back to you after I get back on the dyno. Cheers. 

Sorry, can I confirm what fuel you are using ? 

 

As I read it, I assume its 98 octane with methanol injection on top(with water?) ? or are we talking straight methanol ? 

If you are on 98 octane those power numbers are pretty close to what you would expect for a 6466.  You will get another 100kw with E85. 

2 minutes ago, Butters said:

If you are on 98 octane those power numbers are pretty close to what you would expect for a 6466.  You will get another 100kw with E85.

Which he should also be able to get most, of not all of, with WMI.

Whereas WMI is not the thing you would expect to see effort put into on top of E85.

  • Like 1

zero expert on WMI, just never seen anyone actually make power with it. More used to keep an engine alive when being pushed on knock limited fuels.  In lots of examples, if not setup correctly people go backwards with WMI.  

again no personal experience with this, just what I have seen from the side of a dyno booth :)

36 minutes ago, Butters said:

More used to keep an engine alive when being pushed on knock limited fuels. 

This is where the power comes from, more timing. more power.

  • Like 1
On 04/10/2025 at 8:54 PM, Butters said:

Sorry, can I confirm what fuel you are using ? 

 

As I read it, I assume its 98 octane with methanol injection on top(with water?) ? or are we talking straight methanol ? 

If you are on 98 octane those power numbers are pretty close to what you would expect for a 6466.  You will get another 100kw with E85. 

 

On 04/10/2025 at 9:07 PM, Butters said:

zero expert on WMI, just never seen anyone actually make power with it. More used to keep an engine alive when being pushed on knock limited fuels.  In lots of examples, if not setup correctly people go backwards with WMI.  

again no personal experience with this, just what I have seen from the side of a dyno booth :)

94AKI so I believe it's roughly 100-101ron. We don't have E85 at the pump in Canada, so it's either race gas or water methanol injection. I run a 50/50 mix. Since 4$ a liter race gas is expensive, WMI is often used here. I'm currently running a constant pressure system with direct port nozzles. We tend to see roughly the same from WMI as we do on E85 race gas. Fueling is not my issue. 

Have you seen anyone run more than say 520kw(~700WHP) on a mainline limited at 7600RPM on a 6466? This is the sort of comparison I'm looking for. If I could rev it up to 8500-9000rpm, I believe I would be seeing the HP I was originally expecting. Thanks. 

6 hours ago, Predator1 said:

Please tell me its not a Artec manifold.................. :banana:

It's a 6boost, T4 twin scroll, twin gate. Have issues been popping up with the Artec's? 

Edited by TurboTapin

Just a thought, how come you didn't use a 4D table?

So you essentially run 2x fuel and 2x ignition tables, and the table/map switch is handled when there's enough WMI pressure detected.

This is mine, but using the flex sensor as the 4th dimension, note the slider at the bottom.

Between 0 to 70%, the timing is blended/interpolated , once it goes past 70% ethanol full send

image.thumb.png.29e7eb00f378a335d5469336b3ac84f3.png

12 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Just a thought, how come you didn't use a 4D table?

So you essentially run 2x fuel and 2x ignition tables, and the table/map switch is handled when there's enough WMI pressure detected.

This is mine, but using the flex sensor as the 4th dimension, note the slider at the bottom.

Between 0 to 70%, the timing is blended/interpolated , once it goes past 70% ethanol full send

image.thumb.png.29e7eb00f378a335d5469336b3ac84f3.png

I actually was using 4D tables with my old AEM WMI system. I'm now using "Water Injection Advanced" under engine functions to control my WMI. The timing and fuel corrections are easier to use as they have WMI in mind. Example, my fuel correction is based on my WMI solenoid duty cycle, they also included built in timers to delay corrections before and after spraying, timers to ramp up pulse width, etc. 

 

I didn't even know that existed!!!

Amazing, good work Andy at Haltech!

A bit off topic here, but I actually met Andy at a Aus Lancer car meet at the old Shell Space Station in Ryde back in 2003 or so. He brought out this aluminium case and showed everyone this basic circuit and said he was making an ECU that was capable of using closed loop to self tune. Most of the people there dismissed his idea.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...