Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

phone LCD screen replacements

anyone know who/where does this and can be trusted ?

I have 2 HTC Mobile phones where I have cracked the screen

These are worth $450 and $650 bucks so I'd like to see if I can repair them

all help appreciated :)

I've done it before on HTC depends which model it is I can probably do it for you. Sometimes you have to get the LCD plus the digitizer because it's nearly impossible to seperate them.

You can try the phone shop vendors in tuggers mall or Woden infront of Vodafone

Soda blasting was used on my GTR bonnet. Very gently but still managed to rip a whole in the alloy bonnet.

I think in the hands of an experienced operator it has it's benefits.

I expect rubber and sills need to be covered correctly or avoided.

Ive always done my cars prep by hand. The whole lot. Takes a long time but you get better results. Hope damage was not too bad Mik.

The rubbers can be fixed, they are old and hard and can be sanded back, maybe thats why the soda did that.

The plastic bit in the back window seal is fked anyway, i might cut it out and do a bead of sealant in the gap.

So in hindsight, you can sand just as close or closer than you can blast, and blasting lifts the rubber and leaves crud under there.

Im glad i only did a couple of spots, ill have to clean behind the rubber to get it sitting flush again.

post-89755-0-06799200-1392885986_thumb.jpg

Its good for getting paint out of the tight corners, and probly good for cleaning small metal parts

Its not working properly, the guy sent a bag of the wrong soda, so it clogs up. It works with constant shaking, but thats kinda hard to do while your trying to use it.

I cant get blasting soda in canberra that i know of, and the car will be primed before the right stuff turns up....... :/

Maybe ill do the old wheels or something.

Caught up with a few mates and went for a quick cruise - they met up with the Braddon guys... left there not wanting to be around kidz doing fatty skiddiez. So went up to Mt Ansilie and chatted about Initial D with a m8 who tagged along then went home. So good taking Rosie out for a long nip :)

Spotted a R33 GTR and a white R34 GTT and about 50 SS's haha

Edited by RosieR34

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...