Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont know if anyones posted this on here yet :Oops: , but jus as a general opinion what do you guys all think about the R34 GTT??

SKYLINE R34 GTT

Features

Garrett Ceramic and Nylon Turbocharger with intercooler in L/H wheel arch

Neo Variable Valve Timing

Xenon Gas Discharge Headlights

HICAS 4 Wheel Steering

ABS brakes

Climate Control inc A/C and Auto mode

General Data

Curb Weight 1410 Kg

Length 4580 mm

Width 1725 mm

Height 1340 mm

Wheelbase 2665 mm

Turning Circle 10.2 m

Chassis & Body

Body Type 4 door saloon or 2 door coupe

Layout Front engine/RWD

Wheels F/R 17 x 7.5 JJ (+40 Offset)

Tyres F/R 225/45 R17

Brakes Ventilated: 4 pot front, 2 pot rear

Steering Rack & Pinion (front) HICAS (rear)

Suspension F/R Independent multilink

Engine

Type (see below) RB25DET Twin cam, in-line 6, Turbocharged with VVT

Displacement 2498 cc

Compression Ratio 9.0:1

Max. Power; HP 280 @ 6400 rpm

Max. Torque; Kg-m/ft/lbs 249 @ 3200 rpm

Bore x Stroke 86.0 x 71.7

Redline 6800 rpm

Fuel Injection Nissan EGI (ECCS)

Fuel Tank Capacity 65 litres (14 gals)

Fuel Super Unleaded (97 octane) or better

Performance

0 - 100 km/h (62 mph) 6.4 s (approx 6.2 s, 0-60 mph)

0 - 400m 14.28 s

0 - 1000m 26.91 s

Top Speed 280 km/h (175 mph)*

Drivetrain

Transmission 5 speed manual

Gear Ratios Maximum Speed in Gears (* theoretical)

1 3.214 62 km/h (38 mph)

2 1.925 101 km/h (63 mph)

3 1.302 154 km/h (96 mph)

4 1.000 200 km/h (124 mph)

5 0.752 280 km/h (175 mph)*

R 3.369 59 km/h (37 mph)

Final 4.111

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57351-r34-gtt-factory-specs/
Share on other sites

And no chris this doesnt mean i want one *rolls eyes* jus curious what everyone thinks about it everyone knows i love gtr's! Only reason I ask is because myself and my friend seen one the other day (knew i forgot to put something on spotted), and yuh :headspin:

:werd: I'd like to hear what the people who claim the R34 GT-T is "a sh|t car" are backing it up with :)

I've owned both an R33 GTS-t and now own an R34 GT-t and I can tell you that the 34 is by far the better car. Although the 33 does have a few benifits eg. lower cost of ownership and easier to get mods I can't think of much more, the 34 is by far the better package!

Ive had mine for 6 months and I love it. When I was getting it, I was faced with the dilemma of choosing between the 32GTR or 34GTT (similar price) but went the 34GTT and glad I did. In most cases, it should boast more reliability (as mine seems to have) and not to mention my scary fuel ecomony - 520km/tank on 98RON with City (inner Brisbane) driving.

Absolutely love mine. Had it for about 5 months now and still try to find excuses to take it for a drive at every opportunity. Has been very reliable so far and only minor problems that have cost sfa to fix.

And Choyda all I can say is DAMN, 520km per tank??? I get 400 if i'm lucky, does need a tune atm cause its running really rich.

Just did recent fuel consumption on my spreadsheet last night. Never hit a 12 (L/100km) since upping the boost but not only did 2 of the last 4 tanks get into the 12 but one tank was 11.06 L/100km!

The other one was 16 though... hehe.

They do.

There is a 4WD R34 model called the 25GT Four, but they are all NA.

RB25DE NEO 6 4WD no HICAS and no TURBO :-(

There is a company in Japan that is taking 4-door R34 25GT Four’s and doing a GT-R 4-door replica conversion on them. Full front end and they take GT-R rear quarters and graft them in to the rear doors and quarter panels. Oh and an R34 RB26DETT with 6MT to boot.

They go for like 3 million yen. (about $30,000 US)

Their add in GT-R Magazine says they do R32’s and R33’s as well, both 2 and 4 doors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
    • This is what the look like normally. Except we only got the 2 doors locally
    • Back pressure is not really a function of the exhaust itself, but the turbine/housing. So the question/point remains valid. I would be fitting an EMAP tapping point and seeing what is going on in the exhaust manifold before committing to throwing boost at it. Flow. No intercooler is actually rated for continuous operation at any power level wrt temperatures, as they are no actually capable of shifting the required amounts of heat on a continuous basis. They get hot during a pul, then dump some of that heat into the external air (and some back into the internal air) during off load moments/periods). You probaby do need a bigger core, given the power level you're already at is somewhat above the "rating" of the cooler. Put pressure tapping points either side of the core (which possibly you already have, if you have a boost source near the compressor outlet and tapping near the throttle for existing purposes) and report on delta P across the core.   I haven't done the mass flow calculation to see where you would be sitting on the compressor map at the ~450is rwkW level we're talking here, but if you look just at the PR you're running at, which is ~2.8-2.9, then you have a really really wide swath of the compressor map to run in, and so long as you were making between about 45-75 lb/min of flow, you should have really good comp efficiency, with the ideal being betweem 55 and 65. I can't see the need to shift drastically on the map to get better results.
    • Welcome 🙂 The ER34 wheels and slight lowering suit the R33 sedan really well. I'm firmly in the 'keep it stock, at least on the outside' camp.
×
×
  • Create New...