Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didn't intend for that to happen. I just wanted to open his eyes so he would realise that people like him is part of the problem!

Oh well. Next time I'll just keep my trap shut. Don't want to cause people to leave this wonderful organisation!

']Jason, you put forward a good point and i accept that i am part of the problem, that is why i have made the choice to leave and come back when i have became more mature. My account will be delete 2morrow by request of me

Don't be silly .... we don't want to see anybody leave.

I didn't see the previous thread but its just a case of not acting immaturely ie. the other young fellas in the "take me for a ride" thread. If everyone acts maturely then it'll return to being a fun and informative forum :cheers:

Don't be silly .... we don't want to see anybody leave.

I didn't see the previous thread but its just a case of not acting immaturely ie. the other young fellas in the "take me for a ride" thread. If everyone acts maturely then it'll return to being a fun and informative forum  :cheers:

My point and sentiment exactly Jimih. Unfortunately I threw in a few too many "you're a tool mikey"'s for his liking I think.

My intention was to just open his eyes to see that he is part of the problem, but also that he can be part of the solution.

Treatem mean to keepem keen is my motto :rofl:

ppl like me never know what's going on coz the threads get deleted before we even get a chance to read what's going on.

happens too often, but that's the point i guess....oh well i will shut up now.

I disagree with you Mikey.. i think the thread was a good idea provided it brought forward input and foresight from all members, esp the ones that have been here awhile.. Even though Mikey says he is part of the problem, he did the right thing by addressing the issue rather than just saying "Oh SAU is shit coz of the n00bs, coz of this, coz of that, blah blah"..

i thin everyone is very interested in this topic and it can be very beneficial for all of us to discuss this openly.. Mikey - make a new topic and we all contribute as positively as possible.. no pisstaking, no sarcasm..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...