Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Surely one would see better use on a Canter than a Skyrine? ><

Ummmmmm.................thinking....................Canter, that's a Mitsubishi, so it would be a Trust turbo then. :wassup:

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey sydkid did u find any great differnts in spool time from normal turbine to titanium turbine

thanks Brad

Hi Brad, I ordered it that way from Innovative, so I have no basis of comparison.:)

I dont know if anyone has mentioned it and i don't know if Brian is woried about it

or if anyone else is but with a BIG single can the RTA road transport authority give you a defective vehicle for a big single?

I dont want to get into the argument of 1big or twins but i would hate it to get it all together and have our friendley "BOYS IN BLUE" come and tell you that you have a defect note, i dont think the insurance company will approve a payout when they pop the hood and see somthing like a T88 staring at them!!

I dont know if anyone has mentioned it and i don't know if Brian is woried about it

or if anyone else is but with a BIG single can the RTA road transport authority give you a defective vehicle for a big single?

I dont want to get into the argument of 1big or twins but i would hate it to get it all together and have our friendley "BOYS IN BLUE" come and tell you that you have a defect note, i dont think the insurance company will approve a payout when they pop the hood and see somthing like a T88 staring at them!!

The reality is you are not allowed to do ANYTHING, if that worries you, then don't do ANYTHING.:rofl:

I understand what you are saying SK, I also notice that most of the photos you are showing are from "TRACKS"... (the one above)

Most of the others are not... and i aknowledge that you are not allowed to modify vehicles very far but you can upgrade things like

Fuel pump (in tank)

injectors (in head)

PFC (behind kick pannel & in glovebox)

cams (cam covers)

exhaust (within reason)

and to a certian extent twin lowmounts (like 25/30, GTRS), on the original manifolds

and your vehicle is capable of some awsome HP and without attracting ANY undue attention from the authorites, I drive for a living and around the southern sub's of brissie and even over the NSW border you have RTA setup like clockwork.. and "ALMOST" every time i go past one there is an IMPORT with the bonnet up and a 19-25 yr old looking at the cops (not knowing whats wrong with their vehicle)

I would hate to spend upwards of 3g only to find it gets a defect the first time the screemer pipe opens up. :Oops:

i aknowledge that you are not allowed to modify vehicles very far but you can upgrade things like

Most of the things you listed you are not allowed to modify without engineering. The only reason you get away with it is because they are hidden, or the cop doesn't care or know what they are looking for.

With a big single its going to be high mount, which means it will be obvious as soon as the bonnet is popped.

LW.

Most of the things you listed you are not allowed to modify without engineering.  The only reason you get away with it is because they are hidden, or the cop doesn't care or know what they are looking for.

With a big single its going to be high mount, which means it will be obvious as soon as the bonnet is popped.

LW.

Assuming the cop can pick the difference between a GTR and a GTST and knows that the GTR should have 2 turbos.

people here have been pulled over, and Vic being the worst.

Most of the time the big single isnt a problem.

Only is if you give em attitude or they do you for misbehaving on the street

Just like anywhere else. If you dont give them a reason to pull you over, you most likely wont be.

Wearing clothing that doesnt fit, with your arm out the window listening to 'thug rap' really loud and a hat on, expect to fit in to the stereotype and get pulled over.

I havent been pulled over in over 12months in my bright red loud import.

Anyway back on topic.

What about a single that is equal? As in the front and rear is the same, wheel size, housing size etc? Now assuming the turbo is set up correctly to say something that is more off set, but still suited properly, which would be better?

  • 2 months later...

What a controvercial topic . I think its possible to argue either case or should I say back either team .

IMO its not relevant to compare in line 4's to inline sixes because of their firing order and 180 vs 120 degree crank phasing .

There is something to be said for two waste gates and their flow potential particularly given the 3 cylinders and the mass flow from them . I've often wondered if the twin turbos for FIA Grp A used restrictors or was it the blow off valve that limited maximum boost . Also importantly exhaust manifold design , the short three branch may have less potential flow restriction and heat loss than a divided 3+3 into 2 single turbo design .

At the end of the day I'm going with a med-large single to get around the plumbing nightmare that exists with twins . With 3 litres and an RB26 top end I think a GT3540R possibly with an integral gate should be fine . I'm not that concerned what it'll look like but factory as much as is practical . I don't need race pace just nice lazy torque and enough squirt to keep the Commos and Coons in their rightful place (rearview mirror) lamenting in their expensive mobile lounge sweets ..........

Cheers A .

Interesting topic indeed, some alternative views for thought stimulation;

There is something to be said for two waste gates and their flow potential particularly given the 3 cylinders and the mass flow from them .

I want most of my exhaust to drive the the turbine, not out the wastegate and waste all of that energy. I reckon one wastegate is all I would need, in fact zero wastegates has appeal.

I've often wondered if the twin turbos for FIA Grp A used restrictors or was it the blow off valve that limited maximum boost .

They had a blow off valve that was bolted onto the plenum and limited the boost. Sorta like a Champ Car.

Also importantly exhaust manifold design , the short three branch may have less potential flow restriction and heat loss than a divided 3+3 into 2 single turbo design .

Yep, but they have uneven firing, I reckon an extractor flow 6 to 1 would be better if tuned correctly. Sorta like the R31GTSR homologated exhaust manifold.

At the end of the day I'm going with a med-large single to get around the plumbing nightmare that exists with twins.

That's pretty much the same reasoning as I went for.

:)

  • 7 years later...

Not really, 1.3L 3cyc per turbo V 2.6L 6 cyc per turbo.

Also turbo shuffle in the twin setup is also pretty annoying.

I recon that I can make a jig for a bolton single turbo suitting a Rb26dett if I can get hold a GTR for few weeks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...