Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine squeek during low speed in and out of driveways and that sort of thing.

When the car's off the ground, you can wiggle the springs with your hands, but not when on teh ground.

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats funny.. i'm not expert on shocks & springs but is it you setup the ride height to be so low so that when the car is off ground, the distance between the lower spring seat and the top mount is so huge that the spring is literally not compressed anymore? But yours is R34, mine's R33 so I dunno...

My problem was that with the standard circlip groove on the Koni's and King springs, the front was too low and the rear too high.

So, I bought and installed the Whiteline springs, and still, too low at the front and too high at the rear. So then we machined new grooves (the Koni dealer in Vermont) in both front and rear shocks and refitted. So the fronts were higher, there fore pre load on the springs, and the rear was lower, so no preload on the springs.

the heights though, are spot on. 345 front and 350 odd at the rear.

The squeeking sounds to be soming through the top of the shock, but that could just be the tranmitting of the sound through the steel.....

Stoopid cars.

Pete, sounds like the bush might be binding and squeaking on bumps. Is it front or rear? The rear of 34's is a yoke at the bottom right? Hard to say that they would be the culprit but I had my old ones do it at the front.

Do you have after market anti roll bars? Often the urethane bush can squeak with them.

SK,

Does this method of working out spring rates still hold true for progressive rate springs?

Cheers.

Yep, it's a bit more complex to calculate and I would need to know the coil spacing. I will post up a picture on how to do it over the weekend.

:P

PS. most so called "progressive rate" springs actually are simply designed to remain trapped at full droop. The soft rate is totally soaked up by the weight of the car, so there is no progression in the rate once the spring is installed and compressed.

Yeah, I've got the same problem, my front is too low till it can scrape the tyre on hard cornering... I dunno why but most ppl with Whiteline kit would have this "dive in" stance with the cars. I think I'm gonna ask my front ones to be re-adjust like yours, make it a bit higher so the car's sitting horizontal again...

Yeah, I've got the same problem, my front is too low till it can scrape the tyre on hard cornering... I dunno why but most ppl with Whiteline kit would have this "dive in" stance with the cars. I think I'm gonna ask my front ones to be re-adjust like yours, make it a bit higher so the car's sitting horizontal again...

I have seen this a few times lately, mostly due to people using GTR front shocks in GTST's. They are shorter. Or placing the lower spring seat in the wrong circlip groove.:(

Found an online calculator, it gets obtains values pretty close to what ur estimating SK.

http://www.proshocks.com/calcs/coilsprate.htm

Its from the website below, it has some good stuff on it...

http://www.martindalecenter.com/Calculator...rs1_3_Auto.html

Im going to measure my shocks tomorrow, their Trust coilovers, so no doubt the are going to be pretty stiff. Cant find any info about them on the internet, I dont think Trust make suspension anymore.

Rhett

Yup, hit me with it, SK. :P

These are King springs, lows, which I just got today. $250 for the 4, brand new from Repco, ordered yesterday. Most happy. :rofl: Replacing shitarse Pedders SportsRyder... which are saggy, imho.

Fronts: KDFL-101

ID Upper: 96mm

Lower: 85mm.

WD: 12mm

# Coils: 7.1

Rears: KDRL-61SP

ID Upper: 100mm

Lower: 90mm.

WD: 13mm.

# Coils 9.

Will put up the specs for the pedders when they come out tomorrow.

Edit: Tried that american calculator - roughly converted to inches, and got 244lb for the fronts and 164lb rears... which seems a little strange to me. Most setups have lower spring rate in the rear, but 80lb is a third of the fronts spring rate.

Oh well, shall take SK's calcs as canon, rather than my dodgy guesstimating.

  • 2 months later...

I don't suppose somebody could meaure a set of stock S13 Silvia springs for me? I am just currious to know what the stock rating is. I am about 15000miles from my car at the moment and can't seem to see the springs :)

Thanks guys!

Adrian

Oi Gary....

question for you :) what about these tien jobbies with the little cushion spring ? effect? or not...

They are called tender or helper springs, usually they are between 75 lbs per inch and 125 lbs per inch. They are mainly there to keep the main spring captive at full droop. They also give a modicum of inside wheel contact at places like the dipper. They totally collapse when the weight of the car is placed on the spring stack, that's why they are made of flat wire, so they neatly stack on top of each other.

You can live without them and simply limit the travel of the shock, so the main spring stays captive. But (there is always a but) that sometimes means there is not enough droop to get the wheels off when you jack the car up. Saw that happen on a Nissan SuperTourer, they limited the shock travel to save buying tender springs. Then they couldn't get the rear wheels on. :lol: :lol: :lol:

:) cheers :P

Yup, hit me with it, SK. :)

These are King springs, lows, which I just got today. $250 for the 4, brand new from Repco, ordered yesterday. Most happy. :P Replacing shitarse Pedders SportsRyder... which are saggy, imho.

Fronts: KDFL-101

ID Upper: 96mm

    Lower: 85mm.

WD:        12mm

# Coils: 7.1

Rears: KDRL-61SP

ID Upper: 100mm

    Lower: 90mm.

WD: 13mm.

# Coils 9.

Will put up the specs for the pedders when they come out tomorrow.

Edit: Tried that american calculator - roughly converted to inches, and got 244lb for the fronts and 164lb rears... which seems a little strange to me. Most setups have lower spring rate in the rear, but 80lb is a third of the fronts spring rate.

Oh well, shall take SK's calcs as canon, rather than my dodgy guesstimating.

Sorry I missed this post.

96/85 - 12 - 7.1 = 205 lbs per inch

100/90 - 13 - 9 = 175 lbs per inch

:) cheers ;)

SK would you mind calculating these please:

Top ID: 88mm

Bottom ID: 76mm

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 10.125

Top ID: 98mm

Bottom ID: 66mm (yes it's a big difference!)

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 7.0

Nismo springs for R32GTR

Thanks!

Mark

This is roughly my fronts - hard to do with them on the car. Not sure if its right

Coil OD = 70mm Bottom /95mm Top

Wire OD = 12.5 mm

# of Coils = 7.25 turns

Not sure about the Coil OD, i used string to go around the circumference(outside) then measured the string, then used:

Diam = Circum / pi to get the diam of the outside, then minus 25mm (2 x wire OD).

SK would you mind calculating these please:

Top ID: 88mm

Bottom ID: 76mm

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 10.125

Top ID: 98mm

Bottom ID: 66mm (yes it's a big difference!)

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 7.0

Nismo springs for R32GTR

Thanks!

Mark

Hi Mark; results as follows;

88/76 X 12 X 10.125 = 170 lbs per inch

98/66 X 12 X 7 = 270 lbs per inch

:) Cheers :)

This is roughly my fronts - hard to do with them on the car. Not sure if its right

Coil OD = 70mm Bottom /95mm Top

Wire OD = 12.5 mm

# of Coils = 7.25 turns

Not sure about the Coil OD, i used string to go around the circumference(outside) then measured the string, then used:

Diam = Circum / pi to get the diam of the outside, then minus 25mm (2 x wire OD).

That means the 70mm/95mm is ID not OD?

No coil plant I know of makes 12.5mm spring steel wire, are you sure it's not 12 mm or 13 mm?

If it is 95 and 70 ID and 12.5 mm then;

95/70 X 12.5 X 7.25 = 300lbs per inch

:) cheers :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...