Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine squeek during low speed in and out of driveways and that sort of thing.

When the car's off the ground, you can wiggle the springs with your hands, but not when on teh ground.

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats funny.. i'm not expert on shocks & springs but is it you setup the ride height to be so low so that when the car is off ground, the distance between the lower spring seat and the top mount is so huge that the spring is literally not compressed anymore? But yours is R34, mine's R33 so I dunno...

My problem was that with the standard circlip groove on the Koni's and King springs, the front was too low and the rear too high.

So, I bought and installed the Whiteline springs, and still, too low at the front and too high at the rear. So then we machined new grooves (the Koni dealer in Vermont) in both front and rear shocks and refitted. So the fronts were higher, there fore pre load on the springs, and the rear was lower, so no preload on the springs.

the heights though, are spot on. 345 front and 350 odd at the rear.

The squeeking sounds to be soming through the top of the shock, but that could just be the tranmitting of the sound through the steel.....

Stoopid cars.

Pete, sounds like the bush might be binding and squeaking on bumps. Is it front or rear? The rear of 34's is a yoke at the bottom right? Hard to say that they would be the culprit but I had my old ones do it at the front.

Do you have after market anti roll bars? Often the urethane bush can squeak with them.

SK,

Does this method of working out spring rates still hold true for progressive rate springs?

Cheers.

Yep, it's a bit more complex to calculate and I would need to know the coil spacing. I will post up a picture on how to do it over the weekend.

:P

PS. most so called "progressive rate" springs actually are simply designed to remain trapped at full droop. The soft rate is totally soaked up by the weight of the car, so there is no progression in the rate once the spring is installed and compressed.

Yeah, I've got the same problem, my front is too low till it can scrape the tyre on hard cornering... I dunno why but most ppl with Whiteline kit would have this "dive in" stance with the cars. I think I'm gonna ask my front ones to be re-adjust like yours, make it a bit higher so the car's sitting horizontal again...

Yeah, I've got the same problem, my front is too low till it can scrape the tyre on hard cornering... I dunno why but most ppl with Whiteline kit would have this "dive in" stance with the cars. I think I'm gonna ask my front ones to be re-adjust like yours, make it a bit higher so the car's sitting horizontal again...

I have seen this a few times lately, mostly due to people using GTR front shocks in GTST's. They are shorter. Or placing the lower spring seat in the wrong circlip groove.:(

Found an online calculator, it gets obtains values pretty close to what ur estimating SK.

http://www.proshocks.com/calcs/coilsprate.htm

Its from the website below, it has some good stuff on it...

http://www.martindalecenter.com/Calculator...rs1_3_Auto.html

Im going to measure my shocks tomorrow, their Trust coilovers, so no doubt the are going to be pretty stiff. Cant find any info about them on the internet, I dont think Trust make suspension anymore.

Rhett

Yup, hit me with it, SK. :P

These are King springs, lows, which I just got today. $250 for the 4, brand new from Repco, ordered yesterday. Most happy. :rofl: Replacing shitarse Pedders SportsRyder... which are saggy, imho.

Fronts: KDFL-101

ID Upper: 96mm

Lower: 85mm.

WD: 12mm

# Coils: 7.1

Rears: KDRL-61SP

ID Upper: 100mm

Lower: 90mm.

WD: 13mm.

# Coils 9.

Will put up the specs for the pedders when they come out tomorrow.

Edit: Tried that american calculator - roughly converted to inches, and got 244lb for the fronts and 164lb rears... which seems a little strange to me. Most setups have lower spring rate in the rear, but 80lb is a third of the fronts spring rate.

Oh well, shall take SK's calcs as canon, rather than my dodgy guesstimating.

  • 2 months later...

I don't suppose somebody could meaure a set of stock S13 Silvia springs for me? I am just currious to know what the stock rating is. I am about 15000miles from my car at the moment and can't seem to see the springs :)

Thanks guys!

Adrian

Oi Gary....

question for you :) what about these tien jobbies with the little cushion spring ? effect? or not...

They are called tender or helper springs, usually they are between 75 lbs per inch and 125 lbs per inch. They are mainly there to keep the main spring captive at full droop. They also give a modicum of inside wheel contact at places like the dipper. They totally collapse when the weight of the car is placed on the spring stack, that's why they are made of flat wire, so they neatly stack on top of each other.

You can live without them and simply limit the travel of the shock, so the main spring stays captive. But (there is always a but) that sometimes means there is not enough droop to get the wheels off when you jack the car up. Saw that happen on a Nissan SuperTourer, they limited the shock travel to save buying tender springs. Then they couldn't get the rear wheels on. :lol: :lol: :lol:

:) cheers :P

Yup, hit me with it, SK. :)

These are King springs, lows, which I just got today. $250 for the 4, brand new from Repco, ordered yesterday. Most happy. :P Replacing shitarse Pedders SportsRyder... which are saggy, imho.

Fronts: KDFL-101

ID Upper: 96mm

    Lower: 85mm.

WD:        12mm

# Coils: 7.1

Rears: KDRL-61SP

ID Upper: 100mm

    Lower: 90mm.

WD: 13mm.

# Coils 9.

Will put up the specs for the pedders when they come out tomorrow.

Edit: Tried that american calculator - roughly converted to inches, and got 244lb for the fronts and 164lb rears... which seems a little strange to me. Most setups have lower spring rate in the rear, but 80lb is a third of the fronts spring rate.

Oh well, shall take SK's calcs as canon, rather than my dodgy guesstimating.

Sorry I missed this post.

96/85 - 12 - 7.1 = 205 lbs per inch

100/90 - 13 - 9 = 175 lbs per inch

:) cheers ;)

SK would you mind calculating these please:

Top ID: 88mm

Bottom ID: 76mm

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 10.125

Top ID: 98mm

Bottom ID: 66mm (yes it's a big difference!)

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 7.0

Nismo springs for R32GTR

Thanks!

Mark

This is roughly my fronts - hard to do with them on the car. Not sure if its right

Coil OD = 70mm Bottom /95mm Top

Wire OD = 12.5 mm

# of Coils = 7.25 turns

Not sure about the Coil OD, i used string to go around the circumference(outside) then measured the string, then used:

Diam = Circum / pi to get the diam of the outside, then minus 25mm (2 x wire OD).

SK would you mind calculating these please:

Top ID: 88mm

Bottom ID: 76mm

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 10.125

Top ID: 98mm

Bottom ID: 66mm (yes it's a big difference!)

Thickness: 12mm

# turns: 7.0

Nismo springs for R32GTR

Thanks!

Mark

Hi Mark; results as follows;

88/76 X 12 X 10.125 = 170 lbs per inch

98/66 X 12 X 7 = 270 lbs per inch

:) Cheers :)

This is roughly my fronts - hard to do with them on the car. Not sure if its right

Coil OD = 70mm Bottom /95mm Top

Wire OD = 12.5 mm

# of Coils = 7.25 turns

Not sure about the Coil OD, i used string to go around the circumference(outside) then measured the string, then used:

Diam = Circum / pi to get the diam of the outside, then minus 25mm (2 x wire OD).

That means the 70mm/95mm is ID not OD?

No coil plant I know of makes 12.5mm spring steel wire, are you sure it's not 12 mm or 13 mm?

If it is 95 and 70 ID and 12.5 mm then;

95/70 X 12.5 X 7.25 = 300lbs per inch

:) cheers :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...