Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

Well, a little while ago I discovered that there is an allowance for inlet cam gear adjustment from the factory.

For some reason, possibly emissions etc, Nissan has handily made the VVT assembly adjustable, but it is very hard to do, involving removing the pulley each time you want to adjust it.

That is until I made up a ring which, with slight modification to the standard pulley allows adjustment from the front of the engine in a matter of seconds; with the cam gear cover off of course.

Now, until now, nobody had tried them on a car with any sort of dyno charts to prove anything.

Until now.

On the weekend, an R33 which shall remain nameless, and a workshop who shall also remain nameless tried one of my little wonder rings, and made some fairly significant gains by advancing the inlet cam a little.

The peak power remained the same, but the power through the rev range was increased by a very reasonable amount. How’s 20rwkw sound?

In the lower range, off boost, power was also increased, and then when the car began to boost, power was up everywhere.

The power flattens out at the very top, but stays up and doesn’t nose over.

Car has following mods. Intercooler, highflow turbo and Wolf3D and other supporting stuff.

The procedure with the tune was as follows.

Adjustable exhaust cam gear was added, power run up. Exh gear adjusted to about 4 degrees. Pretty standard stuff on an R33.

The top made was the Black line.

Then the inlet cam gear was adjusted. Can’t say how much by at this stage.

But you can see, with each amount of adjustment, the power curve moved across, until the final one made the 20rwkw at about 4500rpm

Nothing was changed on the tune, no adjustments were made with timing or anything.

Just the pulley was adjusted.

The VVT was still active, and the changeover points, to my knowledge, are very close to stock, they were only adjusted to fine tune the turbo.

Obviously soon, I will be spinning my car up and trying it with a stock turbo but with Tomei Poncams, and seeing what we can see.

Also, I will be making the adjusters up to a commercial quality, with adjustment marks and zinc plating them for longevity, and a batch will be made up.

I would like somebody in Melbourne to try one of these with stock management and stock turbo etc just to get a grip on the power gain possible with everything stock. I will supply an adjuster free of charge, but I will need you to spin the car up on a dyno, which I can arrange in Croyden.

Any volunteers?

Here’s the dyno charts, see for your self and make your own decision.

post-6399-1123579868.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83487-inlet-cam-adjuster-dyno-result/
Share on other sites

Well, the final cost isn't down yet, as for the prototype was hand tapped and not zinc plated and hasn't have any markings on it.

The commercial ones will be Laser Cut, Laser Etched and CNC Machined, or just CNC Machined and then Zinc Plated.

Gotta work out the numbers.

Probably at this stage they will be Laser Cut, Laser etched and then CNC machined. Maybe I will have the markings CNC machined, and then the finished product will be plated.

To fit up, I would say about an hour or so.

You will need a 6mm drill bit, pedestal drill and a couple of hours I guess.

Gotta pull the Cam cover off, remove inlet cam gear and VVT stuff.

Drill out the existing M6 tapped holes.

Put adjuster plate on the back, screw in four bolts from the front of the Cam gear.

Adjust so adjustment is in centre, or where the pulley was to start with.

Lock everything up nice and tight. Real tight.

Reinstall inlet cam gear, and all VVT stuff.

Then, you are ready to adjust cam gear.

If you were serious, you would probably spin it up on the dyno and play with the gear until you are happy.

The best part is that to adjust the gear, you simply loosen the four bolts, adjust gear, and tighten back up.

Not like the exhaust cam gear where you have to remove and replace the damn CAS everytime.

BASS OUT

i might get my mate who owns my old r33 to give it a run if dr_drift is willing to give discounted dyno time :D - i think dr_drift is familiar with the vehicle too. i'm very interested in the results of this, good stuff bass!

More than happy to... Bass is a nice guy and would be good to see some independant results.

BASS - I may even be able to hook up a free new product mention in a magazine for you?

hey if you guys reckon it will work and its safe to do so then yeah i guess we can try it. im a bit scared but theres no benefit without risk taking. when do u want to do it. what do i need to organise? pm us bass when you are ready if yous want me to trial it

Interesting..very nice gains.

Do you have any ideas / thoughts on how much noise and emissions change as a result of this mod?

Noise???? Based on the 2 degrees advance we apply to GTR's and RB20's, it doesn't make the idle "lumpy", if that's the question. They just sit there and idle, same as they did before.

Emmissions, that's a bit tougher to answer as it depends on how the engine is tuned before the inlet camshaft timing is advanced. Just fitting an exhaust and turning up t he boost to 10 psi makes an RB25DET fail the ADR standards. I suspect if you advanced the inlet camshaft timing 2 degrees on a totally stock engine it would make bugger all difference to the emissions, with NOx being the only question.

:mellow: cheers :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
×
×
  • Create New...