Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

looks tough as nails, still kinda hard to beleive that size tucks in that easy

believe me no1 was as surprised as me, i was expecting to have some decent flare on my guards.. ohh well if ur still not entirely convinved i can take photose of the offset plaque on the inside of the wheel. haha

Skyline model = R32 GTST

Wheel diameter = 17"

Wheel width = 9.5"

Wheel offset = +15

Tyre size = 215/45

Modifications to fit = the fronts are fine and the rears could use a lip on the guard as they scrub a little bit on stock guards

Don't know if anyone is running R34 GTR rims on their 33 GTSt so here goes

Skyline model = R33 GTSt

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 9"

Wheel offset = +30

Tyre size = 235's all round

Modifications to fit = none (about 1.5º neg camber on the front)

car feels more balanced with same size rims/tires all round... better than the staggered fitments I used to run... and now I can rotate when the rears are worn... food for thought

Thats cool Nick. Any photos?

I'm doing the same with 33 GTR rims but I've gotta get the tiny 215's of em first.

Skyline model = R34 GT-R

Wheel diameter = 19"

Wheel width = 10.5

Wheel offset = +15

Wheels = Nismo LMGT4s

Should i run Tyre size 265/30 or 275/30? I want to lower it so that tyres are on the gaurds without it scrubbing the gaurds and without rolling.

Skyline model = R33 GTS-T

Wheel Brand RAYS VOLK TE37

Wheel diameter = 17"

Wheel width = 9.5"

Wheel offset = +12 on wheels, +25mm spacer front, 30mm spacer rear for ultra wide stance! soo....-13 Front -18 Rear

Tyre size = 255/40/17

Brake rotors = std

Modifications to fit = everything u can think of haha

just went on http://marksink.com/tire_wheel_offset/offset.html .....looks like my new wheels are going to stick out of standard rear guards approx 134mm BAHAHHA! :D

Skyline model = R33 GTS-T

Wheel Brand RAYS VOLK TE37

Wheel diameter = 17"

Wheel width = 9.5"

Wheel offset = +12 on wheels, +25mm spacer front, 30mm spacer rear for ultra wide stance! soo....-13 Front -18 Rear

Tyre size = 255/40/17

Brake rotors = std

Modifications to fit = everything u can think of haha

just went on http://marksink.com/tire_wheel_offset/offset.html .....looks like my new wheels are going to stick out of standard rear guards approx 134mm BAHAHHA! :D

so have u fitted these yet? pics?

  • 4 weeks later...

Anyone know if these with fit a R34GT with standard shocks/springs....

18" CSA Motorvatr's

Bridgestone Potenza 225/40R 18 tyres

Stud pos is 45.

Any idea if i did swap out for adjustable shocks in the near future would I have problems with them hitting at full lock?

Skyline model = R33 GTR

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 10"

Wheel offset = -1

Tyre size = 235/40

Modifications to fit = Slight roll the inner lip on the rear guards and stretched tyres to get them to tuck under

IMG_0309.jpg

Hi guys,

Need some pics of a R33 series 2 GTSt with:

18x9 35 offset

18x10 37 offset

Anyone have this combo on their R33 GTSt?

I just bought some work xd9's in 18x9 +30 and 18x10+37

I did my research and these should fit with only rolled guards.

Unfortunately my computer needed reformatting and i no longer have all the pics i had.

1.

Skyline model = R34 GT/T

Wheel diameter = 17 inch

Wheel width = 8" front 9" rear

Wheel offset = +16

Tyre size = 225/45 front 235/45 rear

Modifications to fit = none

2.

Skyline model = R34 GT/T

Wheel diameter = 17 inch

Wheel width = 9" all round

Wheel offset = +20

Tyre size = 215/45 front 235/45 rear

Modifications to fit = none

coming soon:

3.

Skyline model = R34 GT/T

Wheel diameter = 18 inch

Wheel width = 9" front 9.5" rear

Wheel offset = +25 front +20 rear

Tyre size = 225/40 front 255/40 rear (still deciding what tyres to use for 18" as ive never had exp with 18" before, is 40 profile ok or would i be better off with 35?)

Modifications to fit = hopefully none.

i rarely see a R34 with nice offset & fitting rims.

Edited by dori32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...