Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As promised, pictures of the ugly things. Skinny across the shell with casting marks remaining (stress concentrators and crack propagation points). A couple of sharp edges for stress concentration and failure points in the machining, but you want the rose joint to fail, not the rod. Casting marks at the shell/sphere junction. I mean WTF is with that piece of absolute crap finishing???? An ideal location for grit to deposit creating an environment for accelerated wear. Yes they are smooth, now, but will last barly 3 months so will not make it onto the car. Emergency spares at best.

Glad I got these real cheap!!

post-6392-1130286323.jpg post-6392-1130286385.jpg post-6392-1130286468.jpg

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well, i guess, that demonstrates you get what you pay for.

Quality brands of those style suspension components are much better.

Also as far as replacement rod end's go. you can pay more for teflon ones etc. probably will last longer and be stronger... but yeah, u pay alot more for them than standard ones.

I guess, having a castor rod break on you is much less dangerous than an upper camber arm.

-geoff that tension rod looks shocking. the width of the shell is half the width of the bolt...

I'll post pics of the replacement I got from BIS.

edit. here are pics (different from previous pics, the bearing i had there was wrong thread...)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y19/merli...ax-replace4.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y19/merli...ax-replace3.jpg

I have no idea how quality compares, but it's looks heaps better than the ones you posted there...

the castor rods i used, are a cheap brand, but i guess some "cheap" brands are worse than others... The bearing i posted pics of in prevous page, was from the actual supplier of those tension rods, but he sent me a right-handed thread, so couldn't use it.

also a question, the ones I have have a little nipple on them, i think this is for re-lubricating them??? is it a good idea to add more oil/grease to them regularly?

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig

Yeah it's only the rose joint and $50 is pretty cheap. :D This is the quality of a lot of the dodge product on the market that guys are buying for $200 at a bargain price, and later they will be sorry.

  • 1 month later...

A quick update, due to the problems of heavy wear associated with open sperical bearings in a road environment (ie; water, dust, mud etc) a couple of manufacturers are currently testing sealed spherical bearings. They are also attempting to get them approved for road use.

More news as soon as the testing is completed.

:P cheers :D

  • 2 months later...

One importer submitted product which failed testing and consequently has not gained approval for road use. As soon as I become aware of an approved supplier I will post it up. If you find one please let me know.

;) cheers :)

SK, thanks for the informative thread. The sealed bearings sound promising. I have castor rods with spherical bearings and I have neglected them. I recently greased them and they are feeling much better. I'll be sure to keep a close eye on them and the surround welds in the future.

I have the KTS rods from UAS - do they look ok in terms of strength? here is a pic: http://nismo.com.au/pricelists/kts/ktscastorrod.jpg

  • 1 month later...

I'm buying spherical bearing suspension components for my car, as it will be primarily used for motorsport activities. What is the best way to maintain the spherical bearings ? Can they be greased ? Is there and effective way to shield them from dirt and sand etc ?

Cheers

Paul

I'm buying spherical bearing suspension components for my car, as it will be primarily used for motorsport activities. What is the best way to maintain the spherical bearings ? Can they be greased ? Is there and effective way to shield them from dirt and sand etc ?

Cheers

Paul

Hi Paul, the better brands come with rubber/plastic cups that seal around the through bolt onto the non moving part of the spherical. Plus they have grease nipples. So you can do a grease change without removing them.

:P cheers :rofl:

  • 4 months later...

Just dragging a thread out.

I noticed in my Dad's mini that the suspenion arms use roller bearings in the pivot points and the Yamaha R1 rear swing arm I modified today uses them aswell.

What are the Pro's and Con's of using roller bearings in suspension pivot points??

Edited by dontfeelcold
Just dragging a thread out.

I noticed in my Dad's mini that the suspenion arms use roller bearings in the pivot points and the Yamaha R1 rear swing arm I modified today uses them aswell.

What are the Pro's and Con's of using roller bearings in suspension pivot points??

roller bearings only allow movement in one axis. most suspension systems move in more than one axis, so you will get binding problems - something will break. motorbike swing arms only move in one axis so that's OK, but the mini ia a surprise

what about front upper arms in a 32 GTR? I have a set of arms here that use roller bearings. they do twist in the middle which is nice as with lots of castor the arm would be being pulled forward.

Is the suspension twisting due to the forces being applied to the suspension arms? or is it they way it was meant to work?

I thought that suspension that used a double wishbone setup would not want to be twisting.

So is there anything wrong with using rollerbearings in suspension that move in one plane? Are they better? The mini had them in the inner pivot point of the upper arm.

A few Pro's I can think of.

The arms can be tightned up to the roller bearing inner race when the suspension is at full droop.

They can be mounted either in rubber/polyurethane or mounted straight into the arm.

When mounted straight into the arm they should be quite solid. depending of the condition of the bearing.

Con's (can't think of too many)

Possile excessive wear, but if they are used in street cars they musn't be that bad? I will have to check the ones on the mini.

A hard hit might brea them?

Con's (can't think of too many)

Cons, a quick list;

1. They don’t absorb impact like a bush, so you get increased NVH (noise, vibration and harshness).

2. They don’t absorb impacts like a bush, so you get a higher propensity for cracking around the joint.

3. If they aren’t water proof, they will corrode.

4. If they aren’t greaseable they will wear out quickly.

5. They are expensive to replace, in comparison bushes are cheap.

6. In themselves, they are not adjustable ie; they require other means of adjustment.

7. They have no deformation capability, so any slight misalignment will result in premature wear eg; hit a gutter slightly, tweaking the wheel alignment

8. They are heavier therefore increasing the unsprung weight if used in the outer joints.

With a bit more thought there are probably a few more

:woot: cheers ;)

do'h! that doesn't sound very promising. The ones I have are the dog bone shape upper arms. I'm keen to give them ago anyway. will be sure to post up how they work out.

do'h! that doesn't sound very promising. The ones I have are the dog bone shape upper arms. I'm keen to give them ago anyway. will be sure to post up how they work out.

I removed a set from a very clunky GTR last week. They were cracked due to impact and also seized due to water ingress and corrosion. I will have some pictures shortly to post up.

When fitting them make sure you put them in the right way around. Otherwise you will end up with massive caster and no camber adjustment. Yes I have seen it done, its easy.

:woot: cheers ;)

yes, I'll double check that! thanks for the heads up Gary.

I wonder if you could remove the ball bearings and replace with regular bushes/sleeves? could be an option.

  • 2 months later...

Interesting read this. I actually went to a suspention guy just over a week ago & he reckoned that rose joints wouldn't be too harsh for the road. Reading comments in here though seems to contradict that.

1 other thing he did say too was that the whiteline adjustable bushes rely on the pressure of the bolt head at the end of the tube to hold it in place & he reckoned they were prone to slipping.

I don't know if this is true or not so a few comments & maybe pictures would be appreciated if anyone is willing to prove this wrong/right.

1 other thing he did say too was that the whiteline adjustable bushes rely on the pressure of the bolt head at the end of the tube to hold it in place & he reckoned they were prone to slipping.

Thats only true if there is no lock nut on the end, just add another nut hard against the first one and it would not slip

Yes a locknut would surely help.

Main reason I ask this is that I've also seen other bushes that have a thread through the tube. When you tighten the bolt up, it places pressure on the thread to help lock it in place.

Not sure if there are any disadvantages with this set up however......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...