Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just tossing up between 2 ECU's

the Haltec and the D-Jetro Power FC.

I really want to rid myself from the AFM's as mine seem to always be playing up.

R32 GTR.

Full rebuild

eventually will be single turbo

eventually will have 500-600HP

Im not overly concerned with cold starts.

Haltec = $2350

D-Jetro = ~$1200 + map sensor ($350) + harness and nipples (~$200)

i will also need to buy the boost controll kit eventually for the pfc ($350)

I am leaning towards the Haltec.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96740-what-ecu-for-this-gtr/
Share on other sites

Or, 3rd option... you could get a normal PFC under $1100

Get two new Nismo AFM's and it'll cost you the same :O

You wont have any problems of extra tuning the haltech will require plus the total re-wiring thats required

AFM's generally play up once they get old, as yours would be.

You'll thank yourself for keeping the AFM IMO. (before ya ask why, searchie button hehehe)

oh yeah, the install and tune for Haltec will be ~$600

i will keep that in mind R31Nismoid.

the AFM's i have got now i bought from someone here.... apparently they were from a 33GTR with 40,000kms.

one AFM is reading 1.5 volts the other is .4 volts...

does this mean one is on its way out? is that normal? the reading was done by a Heltec distributer so they may have just wanted to sell me a new ECU :O

Clean the AFM's and then check the voltage, I use spray on brake cleaner, no residue. There is simply no better way of measuring the airflow into an engine than an AFM. Using a MAP sensor driven ECU means it is guessing the airflow. Do a search if you want more info, this is an often discussed subject.

:O cheers :D

agreed, search button as to the benefits of an AFM are well covered.

Dru - thats why i always get new parts. Might cost a tad more at times (like $100/$150 difference for AFM) but in terms of the hassle and time saved, its well worth it.

Give em a clean as above, and see what comes of it. Also check inside the connectors etc to make sure of good contact

hey,

i cleaned the AFM and connections with electrical contact cleaner... but the car still ran like a dog with 1 leg.. very bad under load, cant go up hills etc.

where could i get the Nismo AFMs from?

also how do they compare to Z32? (i think the answer to that will be "search" :O )

does the Power FC lack any options that the Haltec can offer? and vise versa

the car will also be a daily driver

Apexi for me

D-Jetro has become popular in Wa but it still a big fan of the pfc and i wouldn't go the nismo afms because i believe there the same std size Yes?(62mm) the rb20/25 or z32 are 80mm and give much less restriction to air flow than the std size afm (and personaly i descreen mine) everyone loves putting large exhaust system on to get rid of the gas but what goes out must first get in and in only under a vacuvm(inlet of the turbo).Twin 3" dumps are common so i also run twin 3" intake piping from the 80mm afms, which lets the turbos breath easily.

pete

ps APEXI pfc best plug and play on the market

while the haltec may offer some more features

it doesnt make up for the extra cost of purchase , cost and incovenience of non plug and play and the inability to match the power fc's superior idle/aircond/cold start and wider range of tuners familiar with the product

you have answered your own question. if it's a daily driver then i think it would be a mistake not to go afms and PFC. nismo afms are basically the electronics of a Z32 maf in the body of a RB26 maf. you get the advantage being able to measure more airflow whislt being able to keep your current intake set-up and standard appearance.

where could i get the Nismo AFMs from?

also how do they compare to Z32? (i think the answer to that will be "search" tongue.gif )

I got mine from prefect run, but greenline have them too. As others have said they are pretty simalar resolution to the Z32. I got the nismo over the Z32 cause i wanted to keep the stockers airbox. If you have pod's you might aswell go Z32 as there the same price for new ones.

nismo_afm.jpg

Edited by sav man
If you really do want to ditch the AFM's, look into Autronic. They are an awesome computer and one of the best you can buy (reasonable price too)

I came across this ecu in the "top 5 gtr ECU's" thread..

i have been searching there site >> http://www.autronic.com/index.html

but cant seem to find a price list? for the SM4

yes i would prefer to ditch the AMS's.. the only daily driving i do would be cruising and the occasional trip to the shops... apart from that it would just be on the track. (i dont need a car during the week)

sav man: i would go the Z32 AFM's then as i have air pods.

IMACUL8: i wish

Edited by druzilla32

Problem with ditching the AFM's on a car with mutilple throttle bodies is the poor vacumm quality with low throttle transitions usually between 0-5% TPS. This is why I would use an Autronic as you can tune TPS based to a certain point and thn tune speed density afterwards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...