Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

your mate is 100% correct

Hey Richard,

Sorry to but in !

You promised me a sticker and I still havn"t got it!

Merry Christmas!

MIB :D

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

hehe, always me me me with you!! :blink:

I'm sure duncan has one he can give you if you see him first. I'll be away (in japan) for most of jan but i'll certainly bring one with me to the first state champs round.

merry christmas mate.

Richard

one of the most important things you should do is put in an EXTRA 1.5 LITRES of oil.

i tested this on the track with a mechanicl oil pressure guage.

on the street with standard evrything and the oil on the high mark it surges its head of by just acelerating flat out in first and abit of second!!!!

with an extra 1.5 litres it seems to be ok.(basicly filled up to just over the hump on the bottom of the dipstick.

yes motor out on a stand to do a sumpbaffel.

could be done but by the time you spend cleaning all of the threebond out of the sump and the rest,you could of pulled the motor out.

but then there is the question of upgrading the oil pump at the same time?

id advise to do both :lol:

this car kicked ass so much so at bathuarst, its now a v8 only race. so much for the competition ,a 2 horse race how boring, keep practicing

Precisely.  The explanation came from the original R32 GT-R test drives done by both Wheels & by Car magazine.  The description in Wheels is as follows:

"Nissan's sophisticated Super HICAS system works in two distinct steps; initially in reverse phase (with the rear wheels turning through a small arc in the opposite direction to the front) before moving to the parallel phase."

Car was a bitmore effusive:

"The rear wheels counter-steer to help the Skyline turn into the corner, and then steer in the same direction as the fronts, to help stability.... At high speed, though, the maximum movement is approximately 0.3 degrees"

Unfortunately neither nominate a speed at which the system works/stops working.  From what I understand it changes phases, ie from counter steer to same phase when you get on the accelerator.

The reason that some people say it makes the car's handling more unpredicatble is that when you turn the car into a corner you need to differentiate between the HICAS working and the back end losing grip & starting to slide.  Sometimes that is not so easy.  Disabling the HICAS means when you feel the back end getting loose you are running out of grip.  Having said that everything it does after turn in, in my humble opinion, is all good.

Edited by nobby

with an extra 1.5 litres it seems to be ok.(basicly filled up to just over the hump on the bottom of the dipstick.

been telling people this for the last 5 years ... will they ever listen

nope they just keep saying i cant come out to the track cause i dont have sump baffels

classic case of SBS = sump baffel syndrom

I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit. It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes. I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit. Man does it take some oil now!! I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas. Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem? I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out. I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit.  It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes.  I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit.  Man does it take some oil now!!  I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas.  Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem?  I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out.  I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

Hey Jason, can you post up a picture of your oil/air separator. I have seen some GT-R fill their catch cans within a few laps. It is because some people install a high volume oil pump without matching it to an oil restrictor to reduce the volume of oil pumped into the head. What then happens is that with some lateral gees & high revs the cam covers get filled with oil & it goes from there into the catch can.

The setups for some track GT-Rs are quite particular as to how they plug into the breathers on the cam covers. The White's R34 that they used in Targa Tassie is a good example. I think I may have a photo somewhere of the engine bay.

As for the overfillers (Guilty as charged) I don't have any problems with oil going places it shouldn't.

Yeah, I have a few mates fill up their catch cans, usually takes about 10-12 laps for them. The Nismo item is the one out of the Z-tune catalogue, same item for 33 and 34. It has a little baffle between the inlet hose (bottom) and the outlet (to intake) or top hose. The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo. The 90 bend out of the turbo gets replaced with a new T piece. The only problem encountered was the new T piece needed a spacer made up as it wasn't long enough to clear the housing on the turbo. I thought buying nismo would have mean't perfect fitment???? I guess not. . . .

The thing I do like about it though is it looks very factory and I don't have big long breather pipes going right across the engine bay. For those who like to look as stock as possible :)

post-1841-1135211249.jpg

Yeah, I have a few mates fill up their catch cans, usually takes about 10-12 laps for them.  The Nismo item is the one out of the Z-tune catalogue, same item for 33 and 34.  It has a little baffle between the inlet hose (bottom) and the outlet (to intake) or top hose.  The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo.  The 90 bend out of the turbo gets replaced with a new T piece.  The only problem encountered was the new T piece needed a spacer made up as it wasn't long enough to clear the housing on the  turbo.  I thought buying nismo would have mean't perfect fitment????  I guess not. . . .

The thing I do like about it though is it looks very factory and I don't have big long breather pipes going right across the engine bay.  For those who like to look as stock as possible  :)

That is a neat installation. I have seen some really horrible ones with hoses trailing all over the engine bay & dodgy holes punched into the top of the catch can to allow it to breath. Also the constabulary don't much like external breathers on the things...

Can I ask where from & how much?

That practically looks factory!

it would want to lol. from memory the nismo catch tanks are about 40 000 yen retail. very nice though.

Yeah, I am always copping heaps about the cost, but I am the one who is laughing when between sprint sessions I am kicking back drinking a coke and they are stuffing around emptying there catch cans. :)

Got it from Nengun

http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/product/314

I was going to go an ARC one (or copy) but I am not a big fan on the one or two breather pipes going the full ength of the engine bay even though that seems to be the most popular. It just looks untidy IMHO.

The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo.

That would worry me. When the engines gets excessive blowby it will pressurise the oil return from the turbo. This could mean low (or even zero) oil flow to the rear turbo. Even a short, instaneous excess of blow by (eg; missed gear change) could be enough to seize the shaft due to the lack of oil.

That's why we always have separate oil return to the sump.

:P cheers :D

That would worry me.  When the engines gets excessive blowby it will pressurise the oil return from the turbo.  This could mean low (or even zero) oil flow to the rear turbo. Even a short, instaneous excess of blow by (eg; missed gear change) could be enough to seize the shaft due to the lack of oil.

That's why we always have separate oil return to the sump.

:P cheers :D

Gary, I am missing some understanding somewhere (ok, most places, but I digress). Doesn't the oil return from the turbos feed into the sump in any case? I thought that it wouldn't matter much where the return line from the catch can goes as pressure will be present in the sump from blow by anyway. But as I said, maybe I am missing something....

Judging by the amount of oil that sprayed out when I couldn't get the T-peice to seal off, I can't imagine a little oil dribbling down from can could effect it much at all. If it behaves anything like a stormwater line, then the oil from the can would just back up until pressure from the turbo return subsided, not the other way around??? All it does it join into the oil return from the turbo which then goes straight into the sump. Can't see how it could have any effect on the oil going into the turbo. And wouldn't most (if not all) of the pressure be released as gas back into the intake, which would be an area of much lower pressure, leaving the oil to just dribble down the oil return. That is how I thought it would all work anyway.

  • 6 months later...
I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit. It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes. I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit. Man does it take some oil now!! I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas. Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem? I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out. I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

I am having big blow by problems on the track also. None through the dipstick, just through the breathers. I fill the ARC catch can in 4 laps. :(

My oil pump is stock...I think??? I never replaced it. So I am a bit weiry to add an extra 1 lt of oil.

Will the trust sump extension kit with baffle and pick up reduce my blow by?

Has anyone used the Mines Rocket Cover Baffle Kit?

I need help I hate having this problem at the track, it gets VERY messy :wave:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...