GTSBoy

They're not single use. The workshop manual just gives a simple torque figure to do them up to.

Is this a question?

You can't run large caster for other reasons (beyond your obvious problems from having the wheel too far forward in the well and the steering binding). The bushes in the upper arms cannot tolerate the twisting load that high caster causes, unless you have an arm that will pivot in the centre. The only example of which that I trust is the GKTech one. I can't see what arms you have, but I can see in one photo the bolt end that indicates stock arms with Whiteline adjustable bushes. If that's what you have, even the 6.5° you were running will trash the bushes tut de suite. The only other available fix is to change the locations of the holes in the body side bracket for the FUCAs to change (reduce) the "twist angle". There's a thread on here and the post I linked shows what needs doing to achieve the mod.

Do you have the wiring diagram?

No, exactly the opposite. Neos have chambers that are ~10cc smaller than vanilla 25s, and so they have pistons with lower crowns (to achieve approx the same compression ratio as vanilla). If you put the big vanilla chamber on a Neo piston, you get very low compression. What you need is vanilla pistons to go with the vanilla head.

The fact that it is called out as the "Main Power Cable" should be pretty telling.

Nah - wireless power transmission is a thing dudes.

These are the key points. Any sacrifice of what the RB20 has to offer before the boost threshold only hurts driveability. You can make an RB20 make lots of power, but when you do you get nothing, nothing, nothing, wheelspin.

A short runner manifold an only be teh suck on an RB20.

In that context, the Nismo plenum, if it offers the benefits that they claim, would be a good thing. The larger plenum volume will certainly help on big power cars. The improvements to the runner geometry might help. The length increase would be unnoticeable (except inasmuch as it might contribute to the large volume).

It looks like a simple fabrication job. Do some measurements, do a sketch, and get a local sheet fabber to make it up out of stainless?

S13 and 14 are tripod CVs, (not the proper CVs on the 5 bolt axles). I'm pretty sure that the boots are different. As far as I know, any driveshaft/CV workshop should be able to source replacements.

90% it's the fuse.

It just sounds like ANY NA RB with an exhaust. Seriously.

They what? The runners one RB25 etc are waaay longer than 2 or 3 inches. Are you talking about RB26?

Just sounds like an NA RB. Just like an NA RB.

You could use just about any of the available rails to suit bottom mounted seats. If those ^ don't have any sliders, you will need either a separate set of sliders and a frame, or an all in one. Crank Motorsport are an example of a supplier that can do it either way. JustJap is another. Beware of some of the eBay suppliers

Even better, John Cardogan just this last week did a series of videos on Youtube agreeing 100% with me and 0% with R32Abuser.

Yes you will need an O2 sensor. And no, S1/2 and auto/man are not the same. There are real differences between S1 & 2. An auto ECU will run a manual (just with some mapping differences that aren't ideal) and a manual ECU won't play nice with the auto's TCU.

Give or take, they are same, yes.

Where else is a chunk off the top of the piston going to go?

That's what 9.5:1 looks like. Air-fuel ratio, not compression. Oh, and ~3-4° of ignition advance.

Fine.

There are no BS sensors at the rear of the rocker covers. There is one essential ECU boost sensor (essential to the stock ECU anyway), and some solenoid valves that you really shouldn't just pitch unless you know what they did and what you have just done to the engine. But, yes, wind the boost up now, to at least 15 psi, and just go for it.

Never heard of it.