Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think that will make boring reading having all cars that are stupidly fast. I don't think they have thought this through. Many people don't have any reference point to know how fast a 'normal' car round wakefield is!

They have to get the fastest cars there for sure but to have all of them unroadworthy, unregistered >$100,000 cars I think is a mistake.

Time will tell...

Be interesting to see how it goes...there have been plenty of cars that shoud/could do good times but have usually been several seconds off what they thought...its always hard to get the car to do everything you want it to on the day :D

Be good to see some road cars driven by their owners getting into the 1:05s

Just let you all know that the sort of cars that will be at the track for this day will be around the 1.05 mark.

i believe a ff that does 1.09 will be there also.

That's pretty impressive. A 1:05 is frontrunning Formula Ford times.

I'd love to see what kind of street car can run those times.....

That's pretty impressive. A 1:05 is frontrunning Formula Ford times.

I'd love to see what kind of street car can run those times.....

I doubt many will be able to get into the 1:05s myslef...not to say it cant and wont be done. But it will be a great effort to get a street car driven by a non-proefssional driver into the 1:05s

I agree;most people can nonchalantly say "oh,yeah,I can see myself doing a 1.05 around Wakefield..."without realising just what it takes to do so. I've seen some of Australia's best steerers around this track in a myriad of different car,but I can't see very many non-pro's without well developed and balanced trackday/race cars going near that. It's like the magazine-featured cars that have a huge turbo,some expensive coilovers and a massive "GT Spec" wing,amongst other mod's,having the fulsik owner saying "yeah,mate;she'll run an easy 9 second or high 8 second pass,first time 'round FOR SURE...". Morons:prove it before you talk yourself up! Confidence is one thing,ignorance AND arrogance is most upsetting...

So;end of rant. Is the 30th of March,as infered earlier,a definite CONFIRMED date?

I will eat my hat if they most cars doing 1.05s. for comparison, nations cup lap record is 1.01 on slicks. John's 450kw z does 1.06s. Russell's 350+kw gtr does 1.06s Asif there are a bunch of fully sik workshop cars sitting around waiting for an invitation from autosalon to show how hectic they are.

Big power is of no use at wakefield you need a well tuned suspension and weight package.

Ditto...dont doubt a few may be able to hussle into the 1:05s...but most wont be able to...as not beign criticla but i doubt most car owners will be able to punt a modified car that well....guys who have been doign srpints and events for a few years are a good chance...but the drag boys and folk that havent done a lot of track work will struggle to do thise times...Its not a criticism or a statement that they are bad drivers...its just that it seems to take apretty switched on driver to do those times....same old saying, its easier to drive a slow car quick then a quick car quicker

absolutely, and even if they put a competant race driver in the (as opposed to a drag racer) it stil won't replace years of circuit car development. If the BSM motorsport production car is at 1.09 and improved prod at 1.07 there will not be a bunch of cars at 1.05

absolutely, and even if they put a competant race driver in the (as opposed to a drag racer) it stil won't replace years of circuit car development. If the BSM motorsport production car is at 1.09 and improved prod at 1.07 there will not be a bunch of cars at 1.05

But Mr El Hassen can do 1:05s in his WRX ? At a place like Sandown, give your car 250hp more and i dont dounbt it will beseconds quicker...but at a place liek Wakefield i just can see that being the case.

Anyway,tiem will tell, and i may be proven wrong...and i will be had im happy to be proven wrong

I was under the impression that this event was for street tuned cars?

I know that JP in slot car has managed a 1.06,

but that is a works race car with years of developement behind it and an experienced steerer.

How are street cars meant to better this?

I guess I should have put in my entry " fuli sik, 600rwkw, nitro burner, dyno queen, etc, etc."

Then I may have been a chance. :

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...