Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think that will make boring reading having all cars that are stupidly fast. I don't think they have thought this through. Many people don't have any reference point to know how fast a 'normal' car round wakefield is!

They have to get the fastest cars there for sure but to have all of them unroadworthy, unregistered >$100,000 cars I think is a mistake.

Time will tell...

Be interesting to see how it goes...there have been plenty of cars that shoud/could do good times but have usually been several seconds off what they thought...its always hard to get the car to do everything you want it to on the day :D

Be good to see some road cars driven by their owners getting into the 1:05s

Just let you all know that the sort of cars that will be at the track for this day will be around the 1.05 mark.

i believe a ff that does 1.09 will be there also.

That's pretty impressive. A 1:05 is frontrunning Formula Ford times.

I'd love to see what kind of street car can run those times.....

That's pretty impressive. A 1:05 is frontrunning Formula Ford times.

I'd love to see what kind of street car can run those times.....

I doubt many will be able to get into the 1:05s myslef...not to say it cant and wont be done. But it will be a great effort to get a street car driven by a non-proefssional driver into the 1:05s

I agree;most people can nonchalantly say "oh,yeah,I can see myself doing a 1.05 around Wakefield..."without realising just what it takes to do so. I've seen some of Australia's best steerers around this track in a myriad of different car,but I can't see very many non-pro's without well developed and balanced trackday/race cars going near that. It's like the magazine-featured cars that have a huge turbo,some expensive coilovers and a massive "GT Spec" wing,amongst other mod's,having the fulsik owner saying "yeah,mate;she'll run an easy 9 second or high 8 second pass,first time 'round FOR SURE...". Morons:prove it before you talk yourself up! Confidence is one thing,ignorance AND arrogance is most upsetting...

So;end of rant. Is the 30th of March,as infered earlier,a definite CONFIRMED date?

I will eat my hat if they most cars doing 1.05s. for comparison, nations cup lap record is 1.01 on slicks. John's 450kw z does 1.06s. Russell's 350+kw gtr does 1.06s Asif there are a bunch of fully sik workshop cars sitting around waiting for an invitation from autosalon to show how hectic they are.

Big power is of no use at wakefield you need a well tuned suspension and weight package.

Ditto...dont doubt a few may be able to hussle into the 1:05s...but most wont be able to...as not beign criticla but i doubt most car owners will be able to punt a modified car that well....guys who have been doign srpints and events for a few years are a good chance...but the drag boys and folk that havent done a lot of track work will struggle to do thise times...Its not a criticism or a statement that they are bad drivers...its just that it seems to take apretty switched on driver to do those times....same old saying, its easier to drive a slow car quick then a quick car quicker

absolutely, and even if they put a competant race driver in the (as opposed to a drag racer) it stil won't replace years of circuit car development. If the BSM motorsport production car is at 1.09 and improved prod at 1.07 there will not be a bunch of cars at 1.05

absolutely, and even if they put a competant race driver in the (as opposed to a drag racer) it stil won't replace years of circuit car development. If the BSM motorsport production car is at 1.09 and improved prod at 1.07 there will not be a bunch of cars at 1.05

But Mr El Hassen can do 1:05s in his WRX ? At a place like Sandown, give your car 250hp more and i dont dounbt it will beseconds quicker...but at a place liek Wakefield i just can see that being the case.

Anyway,tiem will tell, and i may be proven wrong...and i will be had im happy to be proven wrong

I was under the impression that this event was for street tuned cars?

I know that JP in slot car has managed a 1.06,

but that is a works race car with years of developement behind it and an experienced steerer.

How are street cars meant to better this?

I guess I should have put in my entry " fuli sik, 600rwkw, nitro burner, dyno queen, etc, etc."

Then I may have been a chance. :

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...