Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ps i use the spool rods/cp piston package, proengines sump adapter, acl bearing, n1 oil/water pumps. 6 boost turbine kit, os giken quad plate clutch. car runs 8 bar oil pressure cold @ idle 5 bar hot @ idle. and it goes like a train.

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

great result witht he GT4094R rockabliiy!

I keep changing my mind on what i want to build, here is my thought process over the last year:

mild 2.6 - modded 2.6 - 3.0 with low mounts - 3.0 with neo head with medium-big single

So my question to you is: Why did you end up going for the GT4094R instead of the GT40R (GT4088R)?

And are you happy with the response compared to ur old GT35R?

great result witht he GT4094R rockabliiy!

I keep changing my mind on what i want to build, here is my thought process over the last year:

mild 2.6 - modded 2.6 - 3.0 with low mounts - 3.0 with neo head with medium-big single

So my question to you is: Why did you end up going for the GT4094R instead of the GT40R (GT4088R)?

And are you happy with the response compared to ur old GT35R?

also interested to find out

hi guys, the gt35r was good spooled hard around 3500rpm with a 1.06 rear, it was a single t3 entry and looked like if was fading off towards 6500-6800rpms, talked to kyle @ 6 boost and to be honest it was a toss up between the 4088r and the 4094r. but there is no comparison, the gt4094r with a .96rear is a fooking animal.t4 twin scroll, full boost thats 2.5 bar by 5300, 1 bar by 3300. and it comes on so hard at 70mph in 3rd when you plant it all 4 wheel wheelspin.

hi guys, the gt35r was good spooled hard around 3500rpm with a 1.06 rear, it was a single t3 entry and looked like if was fading off towards 6500-6800rpms, talked to kyle @ 6 boost and to be honest it was a toss up between the 4088r and the 4094r. but there is no comparison, the gt4094r with a .96rear is a fooking animal.t4 twin scroll, full boost thats 2.5 bar by 5300, 1 bar by 3300. and it comes on so hard at 70mph in 3rd when you plant it all 4 wheel wheelspin.

2.5bar?! What fuel do you run in this config?

  • 2 months later...
hi guys, the gt35r was good spooled hard around 3500rpm with a 1.06 rear, it was a single t3 entry and looked like if was fading off towards 6500-6800rpms, talked to kyle @ 6 boost and to be honest it was a toss up between the 4088r and the 4094r. but there is no comparison, the gt4094r with a .96rear is a fooking animal.t4 twin scroll, full boost thats 2.5 bar by 5300, 1 bar by 3300. and it comes on so hard at 70mph in 3rd when you plant it all 4 wheel wheelspin.

how much torque and whp are your RB30/26 producing ? do you race 1/4 mile ? do you have a dyno chart ?

how much torque and whp are your RB30/26 producing ? do you race 1/4 mile ? do you have a dyno chart ?

hi mate , well where to start. torque was 620lbs @ the fly no graph, bhp was 610 @ the hubs/wheels. and dyno chart below, haven,t 1/4 mile it yet. still on std gtr box which it will break if i do, mainly use the car for track work and road .

rb30flywheelfigure.jpg

on the graph car ran 1.85bar boost but the wastgate spring was to weak, since then we haved upped the spring and boost to 2.6 bar, will be intersting to dyno this year.

here,s a clip when it ran at anglesey north wales at 1.3bar november 08.

th_anglesey5.jpg

i didnt expect u to lose the car on that last corner - looks like a nice track with water views :D reminiscent of phillip island

were u shifting @ 8000rpm? who said rb30's cannot rev :D

you're not running a blow off valve right? the sound of turbo lag reminds me of my previous 3 cars & i love that sound!

what fuel system & injectors are u running?

Edited by Marko R1
i didnt expect u to lose the car on that last corner - looks like a nice track with water views :P reminiscent of phillip island

were u shifting @ 8000rpm? who said rb30's cannot rev :)

you're not running a blow off valve right? the sound of turbo lag reminds me of my previous 3 cars & i love that sound!

what fuel system & injectors are u running?

cheers mate. shifting aroung 7600-7800 but went to 8350 a couple of times, logged on the ecu, yep braked a little late at the entry to the left hander..lol

bov,s yes twin blitz super seqentials,cant hear them over the turbo..

fuel is shell 98 ron, 1000cc,s injectors, twin entry rail,twin tomei intank pumps feeding rail at bothe ends, 10mm return to tank..

cheers mate. shifting aroung 7600-7800 but went to 8350 a couple of times, logged on the ecu, yep braked a little late at the entry to the left hander..lol

bov,s yes twin blitz super seqentials,cant hear them over the turbo..

fuel is shell 98 ron, 1000cc,s injectors, twin entry rail,twin tomei intank pumps feeding rail at bothe ends, 10mm return to tank..

Nice vid there Rock.

I don't think I have ever seen anyone drive so carefully and sedatly on a track before!!! GO FOR IT!!! lol.

engine's only in for clearance purposes, dry sump/exhaust/bonnet. i've just got a new head so theres heaps of work still to do :D

just took these 2 pics. thinking back now i did put the t-piece on b4 the sump, and looking at it now, i agree with scooby that theres no way u could get it on/off with the sump on lol

1001093xk4.th.jpg1001094vg9.th.jpg

come on scoobs, just call me a ricer :cool:

here's another way of running the oil drain with a custom sump.

oildrain001uh9.th.jpg

  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys. Please help me here any advice would be appreciated. This was my set up: RB30det block honed out to 3.2L< forged rods and pistons, port and polished rb25 head, stock cams and cam gears, bosch coils, cheap s*** GT45 turbo and waste gate, top mount manifold, greedy plenum, 80mm throttle body, 800cc injectors, jun oil pump, microtec ltx12s ecu. Was running perfect at 450hp at the wheels tuned by dyson rotary.

That's how i bought the car:

Now i stripped the rb25 head off and replaced it with a r32GTR head from spool import. CNC ported, Good valves(not sure what type), HKS 282 cams, tommie cam gears, Turbonetics GTK1000 turbo, Turbonetics waste gate, 6BOOST top mount manifold, STANDARD GTR PLENUM ( not sure if this is a let down), sard fuel rail, sard 820cc twin spray injectors, One in tank bosch fuel pump that feeds to a catch can with 2 bosch 040 taking fuel from catch can to fuel reg. Eboost2.

So that's a list of what i have added to it. It now only makes 430hp at the wheels on 24psi and runs like shit. where or what have I done wrong. Or what have I left out. Maybe it's my tuner. Any good tuners that are recommended around Brisbane or gold coast Please let me know as well.

Thanks for your help. And please email me at [email protected]

Thanks

post-40332-1245076425_thumb.jpg

post-40332-1245076441_thumb.jpg

post-40332-1245076468_thumb.jpg

dude uve already got this in one thread, doesnt need to be here aswell

use the forum well, its full of knowledgeable people and lots of good info, but dont spam it.

if you keep all the responses to your question in your original thread it will be easier for you, and anyone looking it up in the future to keep track of.

admins and mods: feel free to delete my post when you deem appropriate in the interest of keeping the thread consice and on topic

Edited by Kranker
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...