Jump to content
SAU Community

Sau Upgrade Log


Recommended Posts

dezz, yup, if you check the times of those posts, you'll notice its just before I made the post above. It should be all good now.

Also the dark skin does make the text smaller. We definitely want to run a light skin and a dark skin. Personally I prefer lighter skins, and others prefer darker ones, so this way everyone has something.

The end look will be a blend of the two skins.

Ska, can you check your subscriptions to make sure they're not set to immediate, as its a little buggy in this version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OMG I love the new skins... both Dark and Light work very well with my signature :) Good work guys...

Also, this is a big ask, but do you think it's possible to have a default font option? Just to give a bit of variance between each post... reading Verdana all day long is quite tedious :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dezz, yup, if you check the times of those posts, you'll notice its just before I made the post above. It should be all good now.

Also the dark skin does make the text smaller. We definitely want to run a light skin and a dark skin. Personally I prefer lighter skins, and others prefer darker ones, so this way everyone has something.

The end look will be a blend of the two skins.

Ska, can you check your subscriptions to make sure they're not set to immediate, as its a little buggy in this version.

yep all is well now, and the PM notification email is better than ever as well...good work :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK how's this for wierd. That double email problem of mine does not seem to be SAu's, but only started since the upgrade.

The emails go to a "free" email, myrealbox.com, which allows POP3 and SMTP access as well as web based access.

I closed Outlook, turned immediate email notification on for the qld whore thread, waited for a couple of posts and checked my webmail, hey presto, only 1 email per post.

So fired up outlook and it collected them and BAM it doubled them.

Sorry for not properly troubleshooting it before I reported it, my bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does this version still email once per reply to subscribed topic? (rather than once until you revisit the board?)

as far as i know thats set by each user in their options. if you manually choose to track a topic without posting in it, then you choose which style of notification you want, but if you have it set to subscribe to threads you post in, it will subscribe the way you have it set in your options...

have a look in there and you can set it to which one you want to be as default :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a related point on the improved thread preview, you can't SHIFT+click on a thread from a forum index to open it in another window anymore :) So its hard to browse a forum and open new threads from it

Use firefox and you can control click for a new tab. I don't know why anyone would use IE these days unless for the ATO Portal or a few other sites that can't handle Firefox.

Loving the new dark colour scheme. That light one was hurting my poor little eyes.

One thing is that you can't go directly to a sub forum from the drop down list at the bottom of each page.

Thanks for your work Prank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as far as i know thats set by each user in their options. if you manually choose to track a topic without posting in it, then you choose which style of notification you want, but if you have it set to subscribe to threads you post in, it will subscribe the way you have it set in your options...

have a look in there and you can set it to which one you want to be as default :)

theres no option to allow u to only get one email then no more till you return. typically (in this past on this forum, and all other forums), "immediate" notification does this, ie only one email when first person replies, and no more till youve revisited the boards - however sau's immediate for the last few months has meant an email per reply, regardless of whether you've visited or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...