Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my girlfriend got the turbo taken off her 25t about 3 years ago for the same reason. took it to a few mechanics and majority of them just laughed and said it was not possible, but obviously they didnt know ****. anyway, a few parts were simply replaced with those necessary off a na engine and a few pipes were blocked.

ran ritch as a bitch while it was off but its back on now with no problems. cost about 800 to take it off and 800 to put it back on - got the work done at hills motorsports in sydney. when shopping for a na, we only went down the path of buying a turbo car because we got the car so cheap that it would be stupid not to do it!

it sucks you've driven it before hand though, cos now you'll know what your missing over the next few years! on the other hand, it will give you time to learn to drive properly before you put yourself unsupervised behind the wheel of what litereally is a weapon. if i had my car when i was on my p's i probably wouldnt be here writing this message.

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

800? from hills motorsports? is that just the parts, or parts + labour? thats not too bad at all, i might just do that, what was it like to drive after the conversion? apart from the lack of turbo, was the car very sluggish? well putting it out there, selling a 33gtst, looking for 8.5k at this stage, if anyone wants it before i chop its balls off or any more info, let me know, located in sydney. thanks guys for all the help though, even though i grave dug this thread, lol.

price was labour only. parts were not much at all, we just left them there after we did the conversion back to turbo so they are probably still there if you wanted them. car ran ok, just like a standard gts.

Edited by KR4-GTR
i would kill for the parts, if it is at all possible, i would love to get my hands on them, and they provide mod plate right? so can be driven under new laws, i dont want to stiff some poor p plater, lol.

cheers

we didnt have a mod plate? haha - didnt think you needed one?

maybe you should just leave it as is - turbo and just not put p's on it. :)

if u got pulled over, you'd be twice as ****ed, but atleast you'd go down in style.

Edited by KR4-GTR

ndawg keen, but im in sydney. and kr34, LOL, dont worry, its been done, but i am off my p's, its not the problem, i need to sell my gtst, but gts's fetch more these days cause p platers can buy em, and anyone that can drive a gtst now can afford a gtr, lol, so hard sell, hence the conversion. but yea, anyone that can help me out with the parts, much appreciated, cheers.

Legally as per the OP's comments - couldn't you just get an old blown turbo - rip out the wheels and shaft and stick a bolt in it's place?

It is essentially the same thing as messing around with NA manifolds etc

That way your P plater purchaser could then just put a good turbo back on once they are off there P's.

  • 1 month later...

i am looking at doing this to, i have 2 skylines one is stock and the other is turbocharged, can i just take both my cars in get the ecu's and the extractors swapped over then get both the cars tuned? or would there be more to it?

i dont know if this sends me a notification that someone replies to me so if possibly drop us an email [email protected]...

cheers

  • 3 weeks later...

I was actually going to do the same thing with a 180SX Turbo because its hard to find non turbo ones (SR20's 1997-1998 model) but i ended up not doing it because it was a big hassle car has to be retuned after parts are swapped compression would be screwed up so i called it quits are searched for an NA Skyline R33/S13 because i'm on my P's.

my girlfriend got the turbo taken off her 25t about 3 years ago for the same reason. took it to a few mechanics and majority of them just laughed and said it was not possible, but obviously they didnt know ****. anyway, a few parts were simply replaced with those necessary off a na engine and a few pipes were blocked.

ran ritch as a bitch while it was off but its back on now with no problems. cost about 800 to take it off and 800 to put it back on - got the work done at hills motorsports in sydney. when shopping for a na, we only went down the path of buying a turbo car because we got the car so cheap that it would be stupid not to do it!

it sucks you've driven it before hand though, cos now you'll know what your missing over the next few years! on the other hand, it will give you time to learn to drive properly before you put yourself unsupervised behind the wheel of what litereally is a weapon. if i had my car when i was on my p's i probably wouldnt be here writing this message.

actually they would've known that it could phsically be done, but that it would result in a car with much less power than a normal NA version and couldn't be bothered wasting their time on such a pointless excercise. i'm pretty sure that someone in another thread said that their mate did this and on the dyno the car only made 65kw at the wheels.

infact i found a link to the guys post.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4775249

actually they would've known that it could phsically be done, but that it would result in a car with much less power than a normal NA version and couldn't be bothered wasting their time on such a pointless excercise. i'm pretty sure that someone in another thread said that their mate did this and on the dyno the car only made 65kw at the wheels.

infact i found a link to the guys post.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4775249

Correct, but not all of the power loss was because of the compression. Comparing the two a GTS25t has a bit more driveline loss when compared to a GTS25 which runs what looks like an RB20DET gearbox. So, yes it is pretty pointless as you'll be driving a low compression N/A with a turbo tranny that'll be sucking up more power, and that loss will only start to increase if you have an Auto tranny. Best solution? Hell i found it cheaper to get a GTS25t, drop in RB25DE, 20DET Box and sell turbo parts off. In the end you'll end up with a N/A skyline with the 5stud brakes, making similar power to a normal N/A liner.

For example:

N/A R33 - Price boosted by P plater laws - $12,000

Turbo 33 - $8,000

RB25DE - $1,000

20DET box - $800 (best price i found)

Labour - Depends, i do most of my own work though. lets say $2000

Thats $11,800

Now sell off your box and motor

25DET - $1,700

25DEt Box - $1,500

Total: $8,600

There you go, unless you can get an N/A 33 for under 8k its not really worth it.

Edited by Super Drager
  • 2 weeks later...

But I thought even if you convert a turbo to an NA, it is still illegal to drive it when on your P's, because at the end of the day, it is still registered as a turbo.

If not then, they could dick you for engine modification lol, because in VIC, when you are on your P's, you cannot mod the engine in any ways.

changing the gearbox to an RB20 one is pointless. why change a perfectly good and strong box for one that will require a modified tailshaft, has a mechanical spedo drive and is no where near as tough.

You can keep the standard 25t box in there, but it won't be making the power of a standard N/A due to larger driveline loss although that doesn't matter to some people. As for engine modification, thats not the case in NSW. Word from the RTA is that aslong as it's non turbo its legal.

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...