Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i would think the HKS kit is very good. some of the difference between the steps is as follows.

step 2 has coated pistons

step 3 has rods with 22mm pins and the coated pistons

they all have H beam rods, step 1 and 2 are stock pin size step 3 are 22mm pin. they all have fully forged counter balanced cranks with a stroke designed to give 2.8l capacity (not sure if there is a difference between the cranks). Step 2 and 3 have a coating on the piston crowns and skirts and step 3 have titanium coated top rings. I have to say the HKS pistons are among the nicest i've ever seen. they are a piece of work.

i think comparing the step 1 kit to the crower kit is more than fair. HKS have invested more money in HKS parts that crower could ever dream of. yes they have great rep in stroker kits, but no where near the RB26 experience of HKS who have been developing parts specifically for RB26 since ~1990.

I'm guessing you mean 'more money in RB26 parts'; Crower is "fairly" :wave: big in the US scene,

and the US scene is a "fairly" :wub: big market :D;) And no argument there; I don't think they even

do stuff specially for the RB26.

anyway mate i wasnt trying to pick an argument with you. i was just pointing out what you can get a japanese stroker kit for since you asked.

Not at all, that's exactly the info that I was looking for; I think perhaps R31Nismoid has mis-interpreted

what I was saying (to try to restate - "worst" means "worst that HKS offers" not "worst on offer";

and I've inferred "worst" from "cheapest"; don't know how to make it clearer). The Crower kit

costs roughly the same as a duty-exempt HKS step-1 kit (don't think that can happen, but you

never know ;))

Yes, the step-3 stuff looks awesome, and yes, it has a pricetag that's several thousand dollars more.

But if the step-1 stuff is the goods, a buyer should look very closely at it since it's a few gorillas

cheaper than step-2 or 3, OR anything similar from Tomei or Jun.

Got any photos of step-1 stuff?

Regards,

Saliya

just to add another angle - anyone noticed that 'cosworth' are now doing the internal parts for the RB26 - currently looking for a Aust distributor. I say'cosworth', as it is not cosworth as we traditionally know it - they are now owned by Mahle.... reason - because Mahle saw that cosworth had the reputation and expertise to both bring Mahle into the more mainstream arena and provide some excellent technical knowledge. This came from reading an interview of the CEO (or equiv, Dr someone...) of Mahle.

I know what I would be getting if I was rebuilding my RB26!! :nyaanyaa:

haha, yeah a hand model just like george costanza trying to avoid manual labour all my life!

saliya, i havent bought any step 1 gear, but i did take some pics of it last time i was in japan, i will try and did the pics out. as far as i know the main differences between 1 and 3 is the coatings, the rings and the pin size. i still think the step 1 stuff would be comparable with most other brands of forgies.

but say my crank is f**ked, what crank could i then use to suit the n1 oil pump? say a standard r33 gtr crank? would this need a collar as well?

so the standard conrods will be fine to make say 400 4wkws (530 horsies)? just using new conrod bolts.

any good suggestion for pistons and rings for this kinda power rating?

change the standard head bolts to new ones? or will the old 1's be ok?

what thinkness metal head gaskit would suit what i am going for? as im going to buy a metal gaskit kit.

cheers!

but say my crank is f**ked, what crank could i then use to suit the n1 oil pump? say a standard r33 gtr crank? would this need a collar as well?

so the standard conrods will be fine to make say 400 4wkws (530 horsies)? just using new conrod bolts.

any good suggestion for pistons and rings for this kinda power rating?

cheers!

Yes, a standard 33 gtr crank is fine with the N1 oil pump.

No collar modification is needed for the 33 gtr crank.

The standard rods will be fine at this power level.

Any reputable piston brand will do - Weisco, ACL etc

there is no such thing as an n1 crank, the n1 pump will fit over any rb26 or rb25 crank (although there are some bolt to block differences on earlt rb26s).

most 32 cranks (except 94 onwards) have a smaller oil pump drive, this is not ideal although you can fit a collar to address this potential problem. but using a 32 crank without a collar is not some automatic engine death sentance

there is no such thing as an n1 crank, the n1 pump will fit over any rb26 or rb25 crank (although there are some bolt to block differences on earlt rb26s).

most 32 cranks (except 94 onwards) have a smaller oil pump drive, this is not ideal although you can fit a collar to address this potential problem. but using a 32 crank without a collar is not some automatic engine death sentance

In fact, an emerging problem is with the screws holding the backing plate onto the oil pump working loose. It's a must do job to remove those screws and loctite them in when the opportunity presents.

' date='22 May 2006, 03:27 PM' post='2189542']

if you want/need a crank, in the next few weeks check out yahoo auction:

R34 GTR N1 Crank

http://page4.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/d62252689

100,000yen $1190 + shipping and fees

+ Shipping.

Not worth it.

' date='22 May 2006, 03:27 PM' post='2189542']

if you want/need a crank, in the next few weeks check out yahoo auction:

R34 GTR N1 Crank

http://page4.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/d62252689

100,000yen $1190 + shipping and fees

By the time you land it it will be over $1500, a lot of money for used Nissan crank when they were only about $1000 here, when they were available .

' date='22 May 2006, 03:27 PM' post='2189542']

if you want/need a crank, in the next few weeks check out yahoo auction:

R34 GTR N1 Crank

http://page4.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/d62252689

100,000yen $1190 + shipping and fees

The N1 engines use the same crank as the standard engines

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...