Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wrong!! In a number of ways. Twin pods are popular but on my RB25DETT in the track car I ran single AFM and single pod, however the stock GTR setup is single airbox and is good enough for my 260rwkw/0-100 in 4.02s.

I did realise that twin setups can be run off a single filter, but AnjoO was aksing about having multiple pods for a single setup - which IMO is pointless, the only real time when having multiple intakes would have a potential benefit is in a twin system.

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If you want the loudest pod, the HKS one is the go.

I have one and the induction noise is huge - pity it's one of the worst filters! :D

But then again my pod is shielded so I'm not worried about that. Get a pod and you should always pair it with a box or shield.

i have a apexi pod on my r33 and to be honest after 8 months of driving the car im sick of the induction noise.i have brought a standed airbox and will be putting that on to see if that shuts it up some . the car came with the pod and i have brought the standed box since with a good pannel filter i dont expect to drop power just lose some of the noise i hope

cheers

Heres an idea,....

Get a microphone and mount it under your hood near the STANDARD EFFICIENT and LEGAL filter box

and amplify it through your stereo system so you can deafen yourself and impress all the 14 yo schoolboys waiting for the bus in your area.

SK I think your right!

Yeh well the pod selection is easy the next problem would be heatshielding. All good too put on a pod filter but if its sucking in hot air then can anyone say detonation!! especially on those lovely 40 degree plus australian summers.

man, get the apexi kit from greenline or nengun (check to see which is cheaper)

I got the twin pods on my gtr and they are loud enuff, and as you saw on the website test, the filter the best too.

steve

the noise on a twin setup on a rb26 is much quiter than a single pod on an rb25

PS, I put this thread up there in my Top 20 worst ever questions

LOL sk!

Anyway - I have a LOUD K&N pod filter. I hate it, its too loud.

Anyway I have a custom heatshield, it fits R33. If you want it offer me $50plus $10 postage

Reason for sale - I now have a proper CAI box, from Maxx.

I also have a standard R33 airbox (no snorkel) with brand new B&N panel filter for $100 plus post if anyone is intrested.

Brendan

Edited by Tangles

to make a pod legal (in qld anyway) all you need is a fixed mount for it, for example a bar than comes from the adapter plate to one of the stock airbox mounts.

i have a front mount and can't run the stock airbox as i can't use the snorkel, so the airbox just sucks hot air, but i have a cold ait feed to the pod from the front bar, up through the empty intercooler hole.

having the pod partioned is only good if you have a feed to it. if you just have it partitioned off with no air feed to it then you will lose power.

i plugged the recirulation hole in the stock bov and that cut down a slight bit of induction noise. if you want a pod with minimal noise go for a k&n with the power intake top (the flat top one). i have had one before on my 180sx and it made no induction noise, and i'm veen in a skyline that had one with no noise, but it did have a slight partition. i will have to ask him if he has nosie now that he has put a hks filter on to see if is just the partition.

Well it turns out it WASNT a direct bolt on and i neee some bs adapter now...mmmmmmmmmmm....maybe i bought the wrong pod?

heres the one i got can someone tell me if i got the right one.

Pod Filter

Edited by anjoO
Well it turns out it WASNT a direct bolt on and i neee some bs adapter now...mmmmmmmmmmm....maybe i bought the wrong pod?

heres the one i got can someone tell me if i got the right one.

Pod Filter

thats the one

it should bolt on

was it suppose to come with a adapter? cuz i was putting it on but none of the bolts lined up...it needs a adapter........and me being asian i tried putting it on every dodgy way i could think of....and it still didnt work......so u defiently know its not a direct bolt on hahhahahah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...