Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anymore detailed shots of these cars?

Yes please more pics of the top R32.

Sorry fellas, only took the one picture of the Gunmetal one.

I wasn't allowed into the garages, so this is all I've got of the other 32.

7780454820_6bfbf78600_b.jpg

What Turbs going on Matty ?

"Hammer Time"

GT3582, .82 rear with a Tial 44mm gate :D

Tilton pedal box in there?

Was it a pain to fit?

Actually, OPW pedal box and tilton resevoir, master cylinders and bias adjuster cable.

15183Skyline%20pedalbox.jpg

As for it being a pain, im a bit undecided IF it was worth the effort. Havent had a really good drive with it yet to be decided

Pedals themselves were too closely spaced, we ended up remounting the accelerator and clutch pedals on the outer edges of their shafts rather than centre

Had to lop the top 1/3 off the accelerator pedal (as it was way too long)

Had to make a way to mount a throttle cable to the pedal (and for now we're using an MX83 Cressida cable as its the right length.....will get a proper one made up later in the year)

Had to make a bracket to mount the brake light switch (and that just reminded me i STILL have to extend the wires to it LOL)

DSCN0620.jpg

Some ppl say the interior has aged but I don't see it, classic yet simple dash with great seats and the best design steering imo

Thats it ! What more do you need a/c power windows comfortable seats and rb26 to listen too :) OH , and grip like a mother f**ker !

People who bitch about the R32 interior, clearly have an invalid argument.

As clearly it is the least thing to whine about.

If you bought a car to have a 'nice' looking interior, you'd buy a luxury car.

(Not saying the Skyline interior is ugly)

I REALLY wish I could have gotten better pics of the white R32...it was gorgeous. I walked all the way across the road and across two parking lots once I saw it to take a picture. So sad they came out like that.

I personally don't think an r32 can look as good without the rear wing.

My mate who owned DARDVL had set the quickest top speed down conrod straight at bathurst...anyway, at the time he ran it and hit 285kmh with the rear wing fitted. He then decided to remove it to gain a few km and said that he couldn't push it close to 285km due to lack of downforce.

My point - r32gtr not only looks better with the rear wing BUT it also serves a performance purpose :)

I personally don't think an r32 can look as good without the rear wing.

My mate who owned DARDVL had set the quickest top speed down conrod straight at bathurst...anyway, at the time he ran it and hit 285kmh with the rear wing fitted. He then decided to remove it to gain a few km and said that he couldn't push it close to 285km due to lack of downforce.

My point - r32gtr not only looks better with the rear wing BUT it also serves a performance purpose :)

+11ty

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...